Requirements for Documenting Electrical Cell Stimulation Experiments for Replicability and Numerical Modeling∗

Thorough documentation of biological experiments is necessary for their replicability. This becomes even more evident when individual steps of in vitro wet-lab experiments are to be incorporated into computer simulation models. In the highly interdisciplinary field of electrical stimulation of biological cells, not only biological but also physical aspects play a crucial role. Simulations may help to identify parameters that influence cells and thereby reveal new insights into mechanisms of the cell biological system. However, missing or misleading documentation of the electrical stimulation step within wet-lab experiments may lead to discrepancies between reported and simulated electrical quantities. In addition, this threatens the replicability of electrical stimulation experiments. Thus, we argue that a minimal set of information is needed to enable a translation of electrical stimulation experiments of biological cells into computer simulation experiments and to support replicability. This set includes detailed information about the electronic devices and components, their set-up as well as the applied stimulus and shall be integrated into an existing guideline for cell biological experiments. Ideally, the documentation should also contain measured properties of the cellular and experimental environment. Furthermore, a realization of our proposed documentation requirements within electronic lab notebooks may provide a crucial step toward a more seamless integration of wet-lab data into simulations. Based on two exemplary studies, we demonstrate the relevance of our claim.

[1]  H. Wiesmann,et al.  Capacitively coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast-like primary cells and increase bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro , 2000, European Biophysics Journal.

[2]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Min Zhao,et al.  Guided Migration of Neural Stem Cells Derived from Human Embryonic Stem Cells by an Electric Field , 2012, Stem cells.

[4]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[5]  Ashutosh Kumar Dubey,et al.  Optimization of electrical stimulation parameters for enhanced cell proliferation on biomaterial surfaces. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[6]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[7]  Ardeshir Bayat,et al.  A novel in vitro assay for electrophysiological research on human skin fibroblasts: Degenerate electrical waves downregulate collagen I expression in keloid fibroblasts , 2011, Experimental dermatology.

[8]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Jeffrey T. Leek,et al.  Opinion: Reproducible research can still be wrong: Adopting a prevention approach , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  L H KROHN The electrocardiographic field equation. , 1962, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[11]  Rainer Bader,et al.  A Novel In Vitro System for Comparative Analyses of Bone Cells and Bacteria under Electrical Stimulation , 2016, BioMed research international.

[12]  D. Narmoneva,et al.  Modulation of cell function by electric field: a high-resolution analysis , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  John H Barker,et al.  Direct current electrical stimulation chamber for treating cells in vitro. , 2016, BioTechniques.

[14]  Scott J. MacGregor,et al.  Transient electrical field across cellular membranes: pulsed electric field treatment of microbial cells , 2006 .

[15]  Werner Baumann,et al.  Electro-Quasistatic Simulations in Bio-Systems Engineering and Medical Engineering , 2005 .

[16]  Bikramjit Basu,et al.  Unraveling the mechanistic effects of electric field stimulation towards directing stem cell fate and function: A tissue engineering perspective. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[17]  Min Zhao,et al.  Application of direct current electric fields to cells and tissues in vitro and modulation of wound electric field in vivo , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[18]  Wei Wang,et al.  The effect of electrical fields on gene and protein expression in human osteoarthritic cartilage explants. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Mark Cronin-Golomb,et al.  Osteoblastic differentiation and stress response of human mesenchymal stem cells exposed to alternating current electric fields , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[20]  Ardeshir Bayat,et al.  Degenerate Wave and Capacitive Coupling Increase Human MSC Invasion and Proliferation While Reducing Cytotoxicity in an In Vitro Wound Healing Model , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Nigel J. Cassidy,et al.  Electrical stimulation: a novel tool for tissue engineering. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[22]  Sahba Mobini,et al.  In vitro effect of direct current electrical stimulation on rat mesenchymal stem cells , 2017, PeerJ.

[23]  K R Robinson,et al.  The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  Ursula van Rienen,et al.  Efficient Computation of the Neural Activation During Deep Brain Stimulation for Dispersive Electrical Properties of Brain Tissue , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[25]  M. Levin,et al.  Regulation of cell behavior and tissue patterning by bioelectrical signals: challenges and opportunities for biomedical engineering. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[26]  Jack B Haddad,et al.  The biologic effects and the therapeutic mechanism of action of electric and electromagnetic field stimulation on bone and cartilage: new findings and a review of earlier work. , 2007, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[27]  Bikramjit Basu,et al.  Electrically driven intracellular and extracellular nanomanipulators evoke neurogenic/cardiomyogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[28]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Enhanced proliferation and osteocalcin production by human osteoblast-like MG63 cells on silicon nitride ceramic discs. , 1999, Biomaterials.