Evaluating Gender Biases on Actual Job Performance of Real People: A Meta-Analysis1

This study examined gender bias on job performance in work settings where confounding variables (e. g., organizational level, experience, education) were cautiously taken into consideration to ensure fair comparisons. Although previous meta-analyses examined gender biases on evaluations, findings in tightly controlled laboratory environments may differ from those in highly complicated field studies. We found little evidence of overall gender bias in performance appraisals in nonconfounded field studies. However, there were significant pro-male biases when only men served as raters. Measure-specific gender stereotypicality, instead of genera! stereotypicality about the job, produced gender bias in performance appraisal. Masculine measures produced pro-male bias, and feminine measures produced pro-female bias.

[1]  K. Deaux.  Self-evaluations of male and female managers , 1979 .

[2]  J. Chow,et al.  Sources of Variation in Students' Evaluations of Instruction in a Graduate Social Work Program , 1988 .

[3]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  A new meta-analytic approach. , 1991 .

[4]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. , 1995 .

[5]  D. E. Thompson,et al.  Task-based performance appraisal for blue-collar jobs: Evaluation of race and sex effects. , 1985 .

[6]  William H. Mobley,et al.  Supervisor and Employee Race and Sex Effects on Performance Appraisals: A Field Study of Adverse Impact and Generalizability. , 1982 .

[7]  Angelo S. DeNisi,et al.  A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions , 1984 .

[8]  Patricia B. Elmore,et al.  Effect of Teacher, Student, and Class Characteristics on the Evaluation of College Instructors. , 1978 .

[9]  Hannah R. Rothstein,et al.  Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. , 1990 .

[10]  J. Walsh,et al.  The effects of gender on assessment centre evaluations , 1987 .

[11]  J. Terborg,et al.  Employee reactions to supervision and work evaluation as a function of subordinate and manager sex , 1983 .

[12]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[13]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  A Role Set Analysis of Gender Differences in Performance, Affective Relationships, and Career Success of Industrial Middle Managers , 1984 .

[14]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[15]  T. Beehr,et al.  Employee Gender, Gender Similarity, and Supervisor-Subordinate Cross-Evaluations , 1983 .

[16]  R. Overton,et al.  A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator , 1998 .

[17]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[18]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. , 1987 .

[19]  J. Twenge.  Attitudes Toward Women, 1970–1995 , 1997 .

[20]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  He's Skilled, She's Lucky: A Meta-Analysis of Observers' Attributions for Women's and Men's Successes and Failures , 1996 .

[21]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Women and Men , 1989 .

[22]  Blair T. Johnson.  DSTAT : software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures , 1992 .

[23]  Elaine D. Pulakos,et al.  The Effects of Perceptual Congruence and Sex on Subordinates' Performance Appraisals of Their Managers , 1983 .

[24]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? , 1989 .

[25]  K. N. Wexley,et al.  The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[26]  K. N. Wexley,et al.  Sex effects on performance ratings on manager–subordinate dyads: A field study. , 1982 .

[27]  James L. Farr,et al.  Interview judgments: Using external criteria to compare behavioral and graphic scale ratings , 1978 .

[28]  John W. Shepherd,et al.  The Effects of Source Credibility on the Dilution of Stereotype-Based Judgments , 1992 .

[29]  P. Busch,et al.  Women Contrasted to Men in the Industrial Salesforce: Job Satisfaction, Values, Role Clarity, Performance, and Propensity to Leave: , 1978 .

[30]  Kurt F. Geisinger,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECRUITING SOURCE, APPLICANT QUALITY, AND HIRE PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS BY SEX, ETHNICITY, AND AGE , 1989 .

[31]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Fitting Continuous Models to Effect Size Data , 1982 .

[32]  Susan A. Basow,et al.  Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? , 1987 .

[33]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Performance appraisal: A process focus. , 1983 .

[34]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic Investigation , 2000 .

[35]  R. R. Lagace.  Role-Stress Differences between Salesmen and Saleswomen: Effect on Job Satisfaction and Performance , 1988, Psychological reports.

[36]  Stephen A. Stumpf,et al.  Validity of the Course-Faculty Instrument (CFI): Intrinsic and Extrinsic Variables , 1979 .

[37]  Philip Goldberg,et al.  Are women prejudiced against women? , 1968 .

[38]  Carolyn M. Jagacinski,et al.  Androgyny in a male-dominated field: The relationship of sex-typed traits to performance and satisfaction in engineering , 1987 .

[39]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  What's Good for the Goose Is Not Good for the Gander , 1984 .

[40]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations: A meta-analysis of experimental studies☆ , 1988 .

[41]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings , 1989 .

[43]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Attitudes toward older and younger adults: a meta-analysis. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[44]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Employee responses: Gender- or job-related differences? , 1988 .

[45]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[46]  L. Floge,et al.  Tokenism Reconsidered: Male Nurses and Female Physicians in a Hospital Setting , 1986 .

[47]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Personal Characteristics, Job Performance, and Absenteeism of Public School Teachers1 , 1988 .

[48]  C. Montmarquette,et al.  Managerial Momentum: A Simultaneous Model of the Career Progress of Male and Female Managers , 1991 .

[49]  S. Bennett,et al.  Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. , 1982 .