A Decline in Creativity? It Depends on the Domain

Earlier studies using psychometric tests have documented declines in creativity over the past several decades. Our study investigated whether and how this apparent trend would replicate through a qualitative investigation using an authentic nontest measure of creativity. Three-hundred and fifty-four visual artworks and 50 creative writing works produced by adolescents between 1990–1995 and 2006–2011 were assessed. Products were analyzed using a structured assessment method based on technical criteria and content elements. Criteria included in the current investigation (e.g., genre, medium, stylistic approach) are relevant both to the specific media domains and to previously established dimensions of creativity, such as originality and complexity. Results showed strong domain differences: performance in visual arts increased on a variety of indices of complexity and technical proficiency, and performance in writing decreased on indices related to originality and technical proficiency. Findings highlight the value of analysing creativity across domains. The importance of considering cultural and technological changes in characterizing and understanding apparent trends in amount and types of creativity is discussed.

[1]  T. D. Wilson.  Review of: Shirky, Clay. Cognitive surplus: creativity and generosity in a connected age. London: Allen Lane, Penguin Books, 2010 , 2011, Inf. Res..

[2]  Ian Sands.  Beyond the Pencil. , 2012 .

[3]  Harsha Gangadharbatla.  Technology Component: A Modified Systems Approach to Creative Thought , 2010 .

[4]  Irene-Anna N. Diakidoy,et al.  Domain specificity in creativity testing: A comparison of performance on a general divergent-thinking test and a parallel, content-specific test. , 2002 .

[5]  Sarah Scott.  Art and the archaeologist , 2006 .

[6]  John Baer,et al.  Commentary: Divergent Thinking Tests Have Problems, But This Is Not the Solution , 2008 .

[7]  P. Smagorinsky.  The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports , 2008 .

[8]  John Baer,et al.  Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to Nonparallel Creative Products , 2004 .

[9]  Ellen Winner,et al.  Invented Worlds: The Psychology of the Arts , 1982 .

[10]  T. Lubart,et al.  The Creative Process in Visual Art: A Longitudinal Multivariate Study , 2012 .

[11]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[12]  David Morley,et al.  The Cambridge Companion to Creative Writing , 2012 .

[13]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[14]  R. Burnham,et al.  Teaching in the Art Museum: Interpretation as Experience , 2011 .

[15]  H. Gardner,et al.  Art, Mind, And Brain: A Cognitive Approach To Creativity , 1984 .

[16]  R. Weisberg.  Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts , 2006 .

[17]  Kyung H Kim.  The Creativity Crisis: The Decrease in Creative Thinking Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2011 .

[18]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[19]  Kristen Wright,et al.  The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world , 2016, New Media Soc..

[20]  Oscar Ardaiz-Villanueva,et al.  Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[21]  John Baer,et al.  A Comparison of Expert and Nonexpert Raters Using the Consensual Assessment Technique , 2008 .

[22]  Thomas M. Brewer,et al.  NAEP and Policy: Chasing the Tail of the Assessment Tiger , 2011 .

[23]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Comprar Essentials of Creativity Assessment | James C. Kaufman | 9780470137420 | Wiley , 2008 .

[24]  Jen Katz-Buonincontro.  Creativity at the Crossroads: Pragmatic Versus Humanist Claims in Education Reform Speeches , 2012 .

[25]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[26]  John Baer,et al.  Essentials of Creativity Assessment , 2008 .

[27]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How Does Creativity Happen? , 2008 .

[28]  Patricia M. Greenfield,et al.  Technology and Informal Education: What Is Taught, What Is Learned , 2009, Science.

[29]  Susan P. Besemer,et al.  The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale , 1989 .

[30]  J. Slabbert.  Creativity in Education Revisited: Reflection in Aid of Progression. , 1994 .

[31]  S. Chatman.  Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film , 1980 .

[32]  John T. Willse,et al.  Assessing Creativity With Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods , 2008 .

[33]  Kyung H Kim.  Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) , 2006 .

[34]  Chia-Chen Lu,et al.  A Comparison of Assessment Methods and Raters in Product Creativity , 2012 .

[35]  Panagiotis Kampylis,et al.  Redefining creativity — analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. , 2010 .

[36]  Melanie Grunwald,et al.  Convergence Culture Where Old And New Media Collide , 2016 .

[37]  Howard B. Parkhurst.  Confusion, Lack of Consensus, and the Definition of Creativity as a Construct , 1999 .

[38]  Carol L. Hanlon.  Minds for the Future , 1993 .

[39]  R. Sawyer.  Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[40]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Testing for Creative Potential , 1989 .

[41]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Five Minds Our Children Deserve: Why They're Needed, How to Nurture Them. , 2012 .

[42]  John Baer.  Why You Shouldn't Trust Creativity Tests. , 1994 .

[43]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[44]  P. Barrish.  Henry James in Context: Realism and naturalism , 2010 .

[45]  Transformative shifts in art history teaching: the impact of standards-based assessment , 2011 .

[46]  Beth A. Hennessey,et al.  The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity , 1994 .

[47]  George Hillocks,et al.  The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning , 2002 .

[48]  S. Chatman,et al.  Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film , 1979 .

[49]  S. Atkinson.  Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation , 2007 .

[50]  Richard J. Murnane,et al.  The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market , 2004 .

[51]  H. W. Janson,et al.  History of Art , 1999 .

[52]  Jim Cummins,et al.  Empowering minority students , 1989 .

[53]  J. Glover,et al.  Handbook of creativity. , 1989 .

[54]  A Technique for Assessing Aesthetic Predispositions: Mosaic Construction Test* , 1972 .

[55]  J. Hayden.  Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age , 2011 .

[56]  Janet E. McCurdey.  Reading, the Arts, and the Creation of Meaning. Edited by Elliot W. Eisner. Reston, Va.: National Art Education Association, 1978 , 1979 .