Effect of visual background complexity and light level on the detection of visual signals of male Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders by female conspecifics

For visual signaling to be effective, animal signals must be detected and discriminated by receivers, often against complex visual backgrounds with varying light levels. Accordingly, in many species, conspicuous visual displays and ornaments have evolved as a means to enhance background contrast and thereby increase the detection and discrimination of male courtship signals by females. Using video playbacks, we tested the hypothesis that visual courtship displays and leg decorations of male Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders are more conspicuous against complex leaf-litter backgrounds. Video exemplars of courting males with manipulated leg tufts were superimposed on different backgrounds (complex leaf litter in sun or shade, featureless gray background) and presented to female spiders. Females were more likely to orient to males presented against lighter backgrounds (litter in sun, gray) than the darker ones (litter—shade). Males with larger tufts were also more likely to be detected, as latency to orient was shortest for enlarged and longest for removed tufts. Latency of females to approach was shorter against lighter backgrounds, and approach latency was longest for males without tufts. Female receptivity scores were significantly greater for males against lighter backgrounds, and males with larger tufts had higher scores. These results suggest that both complexity and light level of display backgrounds affect the detection of male visual courtship signals by females and that aspects of the male phenotype may increase chances of detection (and receptivity) against visually complex backgrounds.

[1]  C. Dondale,et al.  REVISION OF THE NEARCTIC WOLF SPIDER GENUS SCHIZOCOSA (ARANEIDA: LYCOSIDAE) , 1978, The Canadian Entomologist.

[2]  J. Endler A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns , 1978 .

[3]  G. Uetz,et al.  COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR, HABITAT, AND REPRODUCTIV E ISOLATION IN SCHIZOCOSA ROVNERI UETZ AND DONDAL E (ARANEAE : LYCOSIDAE ) , 1979 .

[4]  J. Endler An overview of the relationships between mimicry and crypsis , 1981 .

[5]  G. Uetz,et al.  Acoustic Communication and Reproductive Isolation in Two Species of Wolf Spiders , 1981, Science.

[6]  T. Burk Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--'81: Evolutionary Significance of Predation on Sexually Signalling Males , 1982 .

[7]  G. Uetz,et al.  Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproductive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  J. Endler Progressive background in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis , 1984 .

[9]  G. Uetz,et al.  THE INHERITANCE OF COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR AND ITS ROLE AS A REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATING MECHANISM IN TWO SPECIES OF SCHIZOCOSA WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE; LYCOSIDAE) , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  T. Reimchen LOSS OF NUPTIAL COLOR IN THREESPINE STICKLEBACKS (GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS) , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  G. Uetz,et al.  Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae) , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  P. Marler,et al.  On the use of video images as social stimuli in birds: audience effects on alarm calling , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  J. Endler Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions , 1991, Vision Research.

[15]  R. H. Wiley Associations of Song Properties with Habitats for Territorial Oscine Birds of Eastern North America , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[16]  G. Uetz,et al.  Morph-independent mate selection in a dimorphic jumping spider: demonstration of movement bias in female choice using video-controlled courtship behaviour , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[18]  L. Fleishman The Influence of the Sensory System and the Environment on Motion Patterns in the Visual Displays of Anoline Lizards and Other Vertebrates , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[19]  K. Marchetti Dark habitats and bright birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence , 1993, Nature.

[20]  G. Uetz,et al.  Signal efficacy and the evolution of male dimorphism in the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Endler The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications , 1993 .

[22]  J. Losos,et al.  Male Anolis lizards discriminate video-recorded conspecific and heterospecific displays , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  W. Rowland Do Female Stickleback Care About Male Courtship Vigour? Manipulation of Display Tempo Using Video Playback , 1995 .

[24]  N. O. Roster,et al.  PREY CATCHING BEHAVIOR IN FROGS AND TOADS USING VIDEO-SIMULATED PREY , 1995 .

[25]  G. Uetz,et al.  Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  G. Uetz,et al.  Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signalling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  J. Endler,et al.  Interacting Effects of Lek Placement, Display Behavior, Ambient Light, and Color Patterns in Three Neotropical Forest-Dwelling Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[28]  W. L. Miller,et al.  Female preference for dynamic traits in the green swordtail,Xiphophorus helleri , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  J. Rovner CONSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS IN THE LYCOSID SPIDE R RABIDOSA RABIDA : THE ROLES OF DIFFERENT SENSES , 1996 .

[30]  A. Kodric-Brown,et al.  Repeatability of female choice in the guppy: response to live and videotaped males , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  P. Adret Discrimination of video images by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): Direct evidence from song performance. , 1997 .

[32]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[33]  J A Endler,et al.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  M. Zuk,et al.  Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids , 1998, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[35]  K. Haynes,et al.  Exploitation of intraspecific communication systems: illicit signalers and receivers. , 1999 .

[36]  G. Uetz,et al.  Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genusSchizocosa(Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  P. Marler,et al.  Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.

[38]  G. Uetz,et al.  Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  T. Amundsen,et al.  Animal signals : signalling and signal design in animal communication , 2000 .

[40]  P. McGregor,et al.  Considerations on the use of video playbacks as visual stimuli: the Lisbon workshop consensus , 2000, acta ethologica.

[41]  J. Macedonia,et al.  Habitat light, colour variation, and ultraviolet reflectance in the Grand Cayman anole, Anolis conspersus , 2001 .

[42]  M. Ryan,et al.  Shared Preferences by Predators and Females for Male Ornaments in Swordtails , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[43]  L. Fleishman,et al.  The influence of stimulus and background colour on signal visibility in the lizard Anolis cristatellus. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[44]  G. Uetz,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FEEDING REGIME ON BODY SIZE, BODY CONDITION AND A MALE SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTER IN SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE): CONDITION-DEPENDENCE IN A VISUAL SIGNALING TRAIT , 2002 .

[45]  R. Peters,et al.  Digital video playback and visual communication in lizards , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  J. Macedonia,et al.  Sexual dichromatism and differential conspicuousness in two populations of the common collared lizard ( Crotaphytus collaris ) from Utah and New Mexico, USA , 2002 .

[47]  G. Uetz,et al.  Multisensory Cues and Multimodal Communication in Spiders: Insights from Video/Audio Playback Studies , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[48]  Alison M. Sweeney,et al.  Insect communication: Polarized light as a butterfly mating signal , 2003, Nature.

[49]  U. Candolin The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[50]  J. Endler,et al.  Modification of the visual background increases the conspicuousness of golden-collared manakin displays , 2004 .

[51]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[52]  G. Uetz,et al.  Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characters , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  E. Hebets Attention-altering Signal Interactions in the Multimodal Courtship Display of the Wolf Spider Schizocosa Uetzi , 2004 .

[54]  G. E. Stratton,et al.  EVOLUTION OF ORNAMENTATION AND COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR IN SCHIZOCOSA: INSIGHTS FROM A PHYLOGENY BASED ON MORPHOLOGY (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) , 2005 .

[55]  Sarah R Partan,et al.  Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[56]  John Prenter,et al.  Sexual cannibalism and mate choice , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  J. Endler Disruptive and cryptic coloration , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  G. Uetz,et al.  Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age and reproductive state , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[59]  R. Peters,et al.  Signaling against the Wind: Modifying Motion-Signal Structure in Response to Increased Noise , 2007, Current Biology.

[60]  G. Rosenthal Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Visual Signals in Animal Communication , 2007 .

[61]  E. Hebets,et al.  Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders , 2007 .

[62]  G. Uetz,et al.  Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues , 2007 .

[63]  G. Uetz,et al.  Male signaling behavior and sexual selection in a wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae): a test for dual functions , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  R. Peters Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals , 2008, Biology Letters.

[65]  M. Cummings SENSORY TRADE-OFFS PREDICT SIGNAL DIVERGENCE IN SURFPERCH , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[66]  R. Peters,et al.  Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  E. Hebets Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991. , 2008, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[68]  L. Dill,et al.  Environment-contingent sexual selection in a colour polymorphic fish , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  Jeremy S. Gibson,et al.  Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  G. Uetz,et al.  Discrimination of Variation in a Male Signaling Trait Affects Detection Time in Visual Predators , 2008 .

[71]  Jochen Zeil,et al.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[72]  A. Mason,et al.  Substrate-dependent signalling success in the wolf spider, Schizocosa retrorsa , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[73]  Rui F. Oliveira,et al.  Visual ecology of the fiddler crab, Uca tangeri: effects of sex, viewer and background on conspicuousness , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[74]  G. Uetz,et al.  Multimodal communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: female response to multimodal versus unimodal signals , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  J. Stamps,et al.  Species Recognition in Anolis grahami (Sauria, Iguanidae): Evidence from Responses to Video Playbacks of Conspecific and Heterospecific Displays , 2010 .

[76]  A. Mason,et al.  A signal-substrate match in the substrate-borne component of a multimodal courtship display , 2010 .

[77]  G. Uetz,et al.  Spectral reflectance and communication in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz): simultaneous crypsis and background contrast in visual signals , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[78]  G. Uetz,et al.  Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity , 2011, Animal Behaviour.