An extension on super slacks-based measure DEA approach

[1]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: An alternative approach , 2013 .

[2]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Super efficiencies or super inefficiencies? Insights from a joint computation model for slacks-based measures in DEA , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Liang Liang,et al.  Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: One model approach , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Jin-Xiao Chen,et al.  A modified super-efficiency measure based on simultaneous input-output projection in data envelopment analysis , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Yao Chen,et al.  Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Note: Ranking DMUs with Infeasible Super-Efficiency DEA Models , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Joe Zhu.  Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[17]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Duality and continuity , 1995 .

[18]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[19]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF EFFICIENCY CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE ADDITIVE MODEL OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[21]  A. Charnes,et al.  A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[22]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Continuity of measures of technical efficiency , 1990 .

[23]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Analysis of Cost Variances for Management Control in Hospitals , 1990 .

[24]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[25]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Stability of efficiency evaluations in data envelopment analysis , 1989, ZOR Methods Model. Oper. Res..

[26]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[27]  A. Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[28]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Ranking Efficient Units in DEA , 2011 .

[29]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .