Elastography of the bone-implant interface

The stress distribution around endosseous implants is an important determinant of the surgical success. However, no method developed so far to determine the implant stability is sensitive to the loading conditions of the bone-implant interface (BII). The objective of this study is to investigate whether a quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technique may be used to retrieve information on compressive stresses applied to the BII. An acousto-mechanical device was conceived to compress 18 trabecular bovine bone samples onto coin-shaped implants and to measure the ultrasonic response of the BII during compression. The biomechanical behavior of the trabecular bone samples was modeled as Neo-Hookean. The reflection coefficient of the BII was shown to decrease as a function of the stress during the elastic compression of the trabecular bone samples and during the collapse of the trabecular network, with an average slope of −4.82 GPa−1. The results may be explained by an increase of the bone-implant contact ratio and by changes of bone structure occurring during compression. The sensitivity of the QUS response of the BII to compressive stresses opens new paths in the elaboration of patient specific decision support systems allowing surgeons to assess implant stability that should be developed in the future.

[1]  J. Aronson,et al.  What is a clinical trial? , 2004, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[2]  L. Carlo Study Over 7000 Endosseous Implants Inserted during 25 Years in 3300 Interventions . Clinical Results in Different Anatomical and Functional Situations . Statistical Data and Over 20 Years Iconographic Documentation , 2016 .

[3]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Comparison of Resonance Frequency Analysis and of Quantitative Ultrasound to Assess Dental Implant Osseointegration , 2018, Sensors.

[4]  F. Haddad,et al.  A prospective comparative study of cementless total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing in patients under the age of 55 years: a ten-year follow-up. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  Cheol Sang Kim,et al.  Analysis of stress distribution around total hip stems custom-designed for the standardized Asian femur configuration , 2014, Biotechnology, biotechnological equipment.

[6]  L. Geris,et al.  The influence of micro-motion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. , 2006, Archives of oral biology.

[7]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  R Skalak,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  Giuseppe Rosi,et al.  Monitoring cementless femoral stem insertion by impact analyses: An in vitro study. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[10]  Satoshi Yamada,et al.  Structural strength of cancellous specimens from bovine femur under cyclic compression , 2016, PeerJ.

[11]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Evolution of bone biomechanical properties at the micrometer scale around titanium implant as a function of healing time , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Nanoindentation measurements of biomechanical properties in mature and newly formed bone tissue surrounding an implant. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  D. Carter,et al.  Tensile fracture of cancellous bone. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[14]  A. R.,et al.  Review of literature , 1969, American Potato Journal.

[15]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Micro-Brillouin scattering measurements in mature and newly formed bone tissue surrounding an implant. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  W Schulte,et al.  [Periotest--a new measurement process for periodontal function]. , 1983, Zahnarztliche Mitteilungen.

[18]  Carlos Dias Maciel,et al.  Proposal for an Ultrasonic Tool to Monitor the Osseointegration of Dental Implants , 2007, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).

[19]  G. Haïat,et al.  Reflection of an ultrasonic wave on the bone-implant interface: Effect of the roughness parameters. , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Naili,et al.  Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  S. Fukuoka,et al.  Estimation of the migration of tibial components in total knee arthroplasty , 2000 .

[22]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Assessing the Acetabular Cup Implant Primary Stability by Impact Analyses: A Cadaveric Study , 2016, PloS one.

[23]  Vu-Hieu Nguyen,et al.  Finite element simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation in a dental implant for biomechanical stability assessment , 2015, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[24]  G. Haïat,et al.  Influence of healing time on the ultrasonic response of the bone-implant interface. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  J. Jansen,et al.  Evaluation of bone response to titanium-coated polymethyl methacrylate resin (PMMA) implants by X-ray tomography , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[26]  Guillaume Haïat,et al.  Ultrasonic evaluation of dental implant biomechanical stability: an in vitro study. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  G. Haïat,et al.  Reflection of an ultrasonic wave on the bone-implant interface: A numerical study of the effect of the multiscale roughness. , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Alessandro Ruggeri,et al.  Influence of different implant surfaces on peri-implant osteogenesis: histomorphometric analysis in sheep. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[29]  Cheol-Sang Kim,et al.  Analysis of stress distribution around total hip stems custom-designed for the standardized Asian femur configuration. , 2014 .

[30]  S. Goldstein The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Romain Vayron,et al.  Assessment of in vitro dental implant primary stability using an ultrasonic method. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  V. Rangarajan,et al.  Influence of Implant Surface Topography and Loading Condition on Stress Distribution in Bone Around Implants: A Comparative 3D FEA , 2011, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.

[33]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Evaluation of dental implant stability in bone phantoms: Comparison between a quantitative ultrasound technique and resonance frequency analysis , 2018, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[34]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Numerical simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation for the evaluation of dental implant biomechanical stability. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  W. Hayes,et al.  Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. , 1976, Science.

[36]  D. Barrett,et al.  Influence of loading and activity on the primary stability of cementless tibial trays , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[37]  Urs C Belser,et al.  Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. , 2002, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[38]  Trevor Coward,et al.  An In-Vitro Study , 2016 .

[39]  M. Janal,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of endosseous implants at early implantation times: a study in dogs. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[40]  L. Gibson The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  Romain Vayron,et al.  Ultrasonic evaluation of dental implant osseointegration. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  P. Rungsiyakull,et al.  Stress and strain distribution in three different mini dental implant designs using in implant retained overdenture: a finite element analysis study. , 2016, ORAL & implantology.

[43]  Vu-Hieu Nguyen,et al.  Assessment of the biomechanical stability of a dental implant with quantitative ultrasound: A three-dimensional finite element study. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  N. Markowitz,et al.  A ten-year follow-up , 1979 .

[45]  N Meredith,et al.  Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[46]  Silke Hecht,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts due to metallic foreign bodies. , 2011, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[47]  Pilar Valderrama,et al.  Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: a clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[48]  M. Kassiou,et al.  Determination and reduction of translocator protein (TSPO) ligand rs6971 discrimination† †The authors declare no competing interests. , 2016, MedChemComm.

[49]  G. Haïat,et al.  Effects of biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface on dental implant stability: from in silico approaches to the patient's mouth. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[50]  Guillaume Haiat,et al.  Variation of the ultrasonic response of a dental implant embedded in tricalcium silicate-based cement under cyclic loading. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.