A comparative study of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams of arterial road networks governed by adaptive traffic signal systems

Using a stochastic cellular automaton model for urban traffic flow, we study and compare Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams (MFDs) of arterial road networks governed by different types of adaptive traffic signal systems, under various boundary conditions. In particular, we simulate realistic signal systems that include signal linking and adaptive cycle times, and compare their performance against a highly adaptive system of self-organizing traffic signals which is designed to uniformly distribute the network density. We find that for networks with time-independent boundary conditions, well-defined stationary MFDs are observed, whose shape depends on the particular signal system used, and also on the level of heterogeneity in the system. We find that the spatial heterogeneity of both density and flow provide important indicators of network performance. We also study networks with time-dependent boundary conditions, containing morning and afternoon peaks. In this case, intricate hysteresis loops are observed in the MFDs which are strongly correlated with the density heterogeneity. Our results show that the MFD of the self-organizing traffic signals lies above the MFD for the realistic systems, suggesting that by adaptively homogenizing the network density, overall better performance and higher capacity can be achieved.

[1]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Properties of a well-defined Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram for urban traffic , 2011 .

[2]  B D Greenshields,et al.  A study of traffic capacity , 1935 .

[3]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  On the stability of traffic perimeter control in two-region urban cities , 2012 .

[4]  Jan de Gier,et al.  Traffic flow on realistic road networks with adaptive traffic lights , 2010, 1011.6211.

[5]  Christine Buisson,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Homogeneity of Traffic Measurements on the Existence of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams , 2009 .

[6]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic , 1992 .

[7]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  Clockwise Hysteresis Loops in the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2010 .

[8]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Macroscopic modeling of traffic in cities , 2007 .

[9]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Urban Gridlock: Macroscopic Modeling and Mitigation Approaches , 2007 .

[10]  B. Kerner.  EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES OF SELF-ORGANIZATION IN TRAFFIC FLOW , 1998 .

[11]  C. Daganzo,et al.  Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multivaluedness and instability , 2011 .

[12]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  An analytical approximation for the macropscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic , 2008 .

[13]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks , 2012 .

[14]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Hysteresis Phenomena of a Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram in Freeway Networks , 2011 .

[15]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings - eScholarship , 2007 .

[16]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  The spatial variability of vehicle densities as determinant of urban network capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Debashish Chowdhury,et al.  Stochastic Transport in Complex Systems: From Molecules to Vehicles , 2010 .

[18]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  An empirical analysis on the arterial fundamental diagram , 2011 .

[19]  Carlos Gershenson,et al.  Self-organizing Traffic Lights , 2004, Complex Syst..

[20]  D. Helbing.  Derivation of a fundamental diagram for urban traffic flow , 2008, 0807.1843.