The Probability of Iterated Conditionals

Iterated conditionals of the form If p, then if q, r are an important topic in philosophical logic. In recent years, psychologists have gained much knowledge about how people understand simple conditionals, but there are virtually no published psychological studies of iterated conditionals. This paper presents experimental evidence from a study comparing the iterated form, If p, then if q, r with the "imported," noniterated form, If p and q, then r, using a probability evaluation task and a truth-table task, and taking into account qualitative individual differences. This allows us to critically contrast philosophical and psychological approaches that make diverging predictions regarding the interpretation of these forms. The results strongly support the probabilistic Adams conditional and the "new paradigm" that takes this conditional as a starting point.

[1]  Angelo Gilio,et al.  The psychology of inferring conditionals from disjunctions: A probabilistic study , 2012 .

[2]  E. W. Adams,et al.  The logic of conditionals , 1975 .

[3]  Nick Chater,et al.  Cognition and Conditionals: Probability and Logic in Human Thinking , 2010 .

[4]  Moyra Williams,et al.  New Horizons in Psychology , 1966, Mental Health.

[5]  Niki Pfeifer,et al.  Experiments on Aristotle’s Thesis: Towards an Experimental Philosophy of Conditionals , 2012 .

[6]  David E. Over,et al.  New paradigm psychology of reasoning , 2009 .

[7]  Geoffrey P. Goodwin.  Is the basic conditional probabilistic? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  I. Douven,et al.  The Adams family , 2010, Cognition.

[9]  Daniel Rothschild,et al.  Capturing the relationship between conditionals and conditional probability with a trivalent semantics , 2014, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[10]  E. Lowe.  Not a counterexample to modus ponens , 1987 .

[11]  G. Kleiter,et al.  How people interpret conditionals: shifts toward the conditional event. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  B. D. Finetti,et al.  La Logique de la Probabilite , 1937 .

[13]  David E. Over,et al.  New paradigm psychology of reasoning: An introduction to the special issue edited by Elqayam, Bonnefon, and Over , 2013 .

[14]  Peter W. Milne.  Indicative conditionals, conditional probabilities, and the “defective truth-table”: A request for more experiments , 2012 .

[15]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  The meaning(s) of conditionals: conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  David E. Over,et al.  Uncertainty and the de Finetti tables , 2013 .

[17]  David E Over,et al.  Conditionals and conditional probability. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning , 2012 .

[19]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[20]  Niki Pfeifer,et al.  Framing human inference by coherence based probability logic , 2009, J. Appl. Log..

[21]  Luís Moniz Pereira,et al.  On Conditionals , 2015, GCAI.

[22]  S. Sloman,et al.  The probability of causal conditionals , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Niki Pfeifer,et al.  Probabilistic theories of reasoning need pragmatics too: Modulating relevance in uncertain condition , 2011 .

[24]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  J. Bennett.  A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals , 2003 .

[26]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[27]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[28]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. , 2002, Psychological review.

[29]  Ernest W. Adams,et al.  A primer of probability logic , 1996 .

[30]  David E. Over,et al.  Betting on conditionals , 2010 .

[31]  Allan Gibbard,et al.  Two Recent Theories of Conditionals , 1980 .

[32]  Robert Stalnaker.  A Defense of Conditional Excluded Middle , 1980 .

[33]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  How implication is understood. , 1969 .

[34]  Robert Stalnaker.  A Theory of Conditionals , 2019, Knowledge and Conditionals.

[35]  Igor Douven,et al.  The Probabilities of Conditionals Revisited , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  D. Lewis.  Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities , 1976 .