The Linguistic Intergroup Bias As an Implicit Indicator of Prejudice

The Linguistic Intergroup Bias (LIB) is the tendency to describe stereotypic events in more abstract terms than counterstereotypic events. We examined whether a paper-and-pencil measure based on the LIB could be used as an implicit indicator of prejudice. Experiment 1 demonstrated that a measure of implicit racial prejudice based on the LIB predicted whether subjects evaluated an African-American or a Caucasian as threatening. Experiment 2 extended this finding with indirect measures of threat. In both of these experiments, an explicit measure of prejudice failed to predict subjects' evaluations. Experiment 3 demonstrated that a measure of implicit gender prejudice based on the LIB was correlated with an implicit prejudice measure based on biased attributional processing. Across these three experiments, implicit and explicit measures of prejudice were largely uncorrelated.

[1]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Symbolic Racism: Problems of Motive Attribution in Political Analysis , 1986 .

[2]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[3]  M. Manis,et al.  Stereotypes and social judgment. , 1986 .

[4]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R. Hastie Causes and effects of causal attribution , 1984 .

[6]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice , 1979 .

[7]  C. Judd,et al.  Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  J. B. Mcconahay,et al.  Has Racism Declined in America? , 1981 .

[9]  A. Maass,et al.  Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. , 1996 .

[10]  G. Semin,et al.  Language use in intergroup contexts: the linguistic intergroup bias. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  A. Maass,et al.  Linguistic intergroup bias: differential expectancies or in-group protection? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  A. Elliot,et al.  Are Racial Stereotypes Really Fading? The Princeton Trilogy Revisited , 1995 .

[13]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  An Individual Difference Measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions , 1997 .

[15]  W. Hippel,et al.  The role of the linguistic intergroup bias in expectancy maintenance , 1996 .

[16]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[17]  C. Stangor,et al.  The role of memory biases in stereotype maintenance. , 1994, The British journal of social psychology.

[18]  J. Hilton,et al.  The Role of Consistency in the Judgment of Stereotype-Relevant Behaviors , 1990 .

[19]  Patrick T. Vargas,et al.  On The Role Of Encoding Processes In Stereotype Maintenance , 1995 .

[20]  D. Nelson,et al.  Implicit Memory for Age Stereotypes , 1995 .

[21]  K. Fiedler,et al.  The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. , 1988 .

[22]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS) , 1973 .

[23]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.