The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults

A tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) elicitation task and a picture-naming task were used to examine the role of neighborhood frequency as well as word frequency and neighborhood density in speech production. As predicted for the younger adults in Experiment 1, more TOT states were elicited for words with low word frequency and with sparse neighborhoods. Contrary to predictions, neighborhood frequency did not significantly influence retrieval of the target word. For the older adults in Experiment 2, however, more TOT states were elicited for words with low neighborhood frequency. Furthermore, in Experiment 3, pictures with high neighborhood frequency were named more quickly and accurately than pictures with low neighborhood frequency. These results show that the number of neighbors and the frequency of those neighbors influence lexical retrieval in speech production. The facilitative nature of these factors is more parsimoniously accounted for by an interactive model rather than by a strictly feedforward model of speech production.

[1]  D. Mackay.  The Organization of Perception and Action , 1987 .

[2]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon , 1985, Speech Commun..

[3]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[4]  E. Maylor,et al.  Age, blocking and the tip of the tongue state. , 1990, British journal of psychology.

[5]  D. Burke,et al.  10 Aging and Word Retrieval: Selective Age Deficits in Language , 1990 .

[6]  D. Schacter,et al.  On the Tip of the Tongue An Event-Related fMRI Study of Semantic Retrieval Failure and Cognitive Conflict , 2001, Neuron.

[7]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[8]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[9]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[10]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Inhibition From Related Primes in Semantic Memory Retrieval : A Reappraisal of Brown ' s ( 1979 ) Paradigm , 2005 .

[11]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  Discussion of Wike and Church's comments , 1976 .

[12]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Accessing Spoken Words: The Importance of Word Onsets , 1989 .

[13]  H. Nusbaum.  Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the Familiarity of 20,000 Words, Research on Speech Perception , 1984 .

[14]  G. Zipf.  The Psycho-Biology Of Language: AN INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC PHILOLOGY , 1999 .

[15]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  TOTimals : a controlled experimental method for studying tip-of-the-tongue states , 1991 .

[16]  L W Poon,et al.  Effects of priming in word retrieval. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[18]  Gregory V. Jones,et al.  Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state , 1987, Cognition.

[19]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production , 1998 .

[20]  M. Vitevitch,et al.  The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. , 1996, Language and speech.

[21]  Ferdinand de Saussure.  Course in General Linguistics , 1916 .

[22]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[23]  K Bock,et al.  The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[24]  M. K. Kevari,et al.  Name That Tune: Eliciting the Tip-of-the-Tongue Experience Using Auditory Stimuli , 1995, Psychological reports.

[25]  Kathleen Rastle,et al.  Priming the Tip of the Tongue: Effects of Prior Processing on Word Retrieval in Young and Older Adults , 1996 .

[26]  D. Schacter.  The seven sins of memory. Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[27]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? , 2003 .

[28]  J. Gordon.  Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: spontaneous and structured contexts , 2002, Brain and Language.

[29]  S. Lupker,et al.  Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Gregory V. Jones,et al.  Back to Woodworth: Role of interlopers in the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Processing of verb-argument structure and subcategorization information in brain-damaged patients: Event-related potential evidence , 2001 .

[32]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[33]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  J. Hanley,et al.  The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Do experimenter-presented interlopers have any effect? , 1992, Cognition.

[35]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[36]  Noah Webster,et al.  Webster's new collegiate dictionary , 1936 .

[37]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[38]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Competitor effects during lexical access: chasing Zipf's tail , 1993 .

[39]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Animals and Artifacts May Not Be Treated Equally: Differentiating Strong and Weak Forms of Category-Specific Visual Agnosia , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  T. Gale,et al.  The Effect of ‘Masking’ on Picture Naming , 2002, Cortex.

[41]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? , 1991 .

[42]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .

[43]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  I recognize your face but I can’t remember your name: Further evidence on the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon , 1966 .

[45]  V. Bruce,et al.  Resolving semantically induced tip-of-the-tongue states for proper nouns , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[46]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[47]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[48]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[50]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[51]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  James D. Church,et al.  Comments on Clark's “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy” , 1976 .

[53]  K. Murphy,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests, Second Ediction , 1998 .

[54]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Chapter Five Cognition and Aging: A Theory of New Learning and the Use of Old Connections , 1990 .

[55]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[56]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[58]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[59]  D. Burke,et al.  Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[61]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.