Shorter side chains optimize helix–helix packing

A systematic study of helix–helix packing in a comprehensive database of protein structures revealed that the side chains inside helix–helix interfaces on average are shorter than those in the noninterface parts of the helices. The study follows our earlier study of this effect in transmembrane helices. The results obtained on the entire database of protein structures are consistent with those obtained on the transmembrane helices. The difference in the length of interface and noninterface side chains is small but statistically significant. It indicates that helices, if viewed along their main axis, statistically are not circular, but have a flattened interface. This effect brings the helices closer to each other and creates a tighter structural packing. The results provide an interesting insight into the aspects of protein structure and folding.

[1]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Strategies for modeling the interactions of transmembrane helices of G protein-coupled receptors by geometric complementarity using the GRAMM computer algorithm. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[3]  T L Blundell,et al.  Packing of secondary structural elements in proteins. Analysis and prediction of inter-helix distances. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  P Argos,et al.  Principles of helix-helix packing in proteins: the helical lattice superposition model. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  I. Vakser,et al.  Side chains in transmembrane helices are shorter at helix‐helix interfaces , 2000, Proteins.

[6]  I. Vakser,et al.  A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein--protein complexes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  I A Vakser.  Long-distance potentials: an approach to the multiple-minima problem in ligand-receptor interaction. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[8]  U. Hobohm,et al.  Enlarged representative set of protein structures , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  R. Li,et al.  The hydrogen exchange core and protein folding , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  The role of geometric complementarity in secondary structure packing: A systematic docking study , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  L. Kuhn,et al.  Discovery of a significant, nontopological preference for antiparallel alignment of helices with parallel regions in sheets , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  M. Levitt.  A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  I. Vakser.  Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. , 1998, Biopolymers.