Protecting patient privacy when sharing patient-level data from clinical trials

BackgroundGreater transparency and, in particular, sharing of patient-level data for further scientific research is an increasingly important topic for the pharmaceutical industry and other organisations who sponsor and conduct clinical trials as well as generally in the interests of patients participating in studies. A concern remains, however, over how to appropriately prepare and share clinical trial data with third party researchers, whilst maintaining patient confidentiality. Clinical trial datasets contain very detailed information on each participant. Risk to patient privacy can be mitigated by data reduction techniques. However, retention of data utility is important in order to allow meaningful scientific research. In addition, for clinical trial data, an excessive application of such techniques may pose a public health risk if misleading results are produced. After considering existing guidance, this article makes recommendations with the aim of promoting an approach that balances data utility and privacy risk and is applicable across clinical trial data holders.DiscussionOur key recommendations are as follows:1.Data anonymisation/de-identification: Data holders are responsible for generating de-identified datasets which are intended to offer increased protection for patient privacy through masking or generalisation of direct and some indirect identifiers.2.Controlled access to data, including use of a data sharing agreement: A legally binding data sharing agreement should be in place, including agreements not to download or further share data and not to attempt to seek to identify patients. Appropriate levels of security should be used for transferring data or providing access; one solution is use of a secure ‘locked box’ system which provides additional safeguards.SummaryThis article provides recommendations on best practices to de-identify/anonymise clinical trial data for sharing with third-party researchers, as well as controlled access to data and data sharing agreements. The recommendations are applicable to all clinical trial data holders. Further work will be needed to identify and evaluate competing possibilities as regulations, attitudes to risk and technologies evolve.

[1]  David Morgan,et al.  European Federation of Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2003 .

[2]  Bill Gibson Multi-Sponsor Data Transparency: A Group Approach To Sharing , 2014 .

[3]  Christopher John Hilton,et al.  Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2005 .

[4]  Liam Peyton,et al.  Systematic Literature Review on the Anonymization of High Dimensional Streaming Datasets for Health Data Sharing , 2015, EUSPN/ICTH.

[5]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[6]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Good practice principles for sharing individual participant data from publicly funded clinical trials , 2015, Trials.

[7]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  A General Survey of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining Models and Algorithms , 2008, Privacy-Preserving Data Mining.

[8]  A. Sumner,et al.  Is inequality all about the tails?: The Palma measure of income inequality , 2014 .

[9]  Karen Wells,et al.  Preparing individual patient data from clinical trials for sharing: the GlaxoSmithKline approach. , 2014, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[10]  Denise Falbo Shawn LaFlamme,et al.  Campaign , 2017 .

[11]  B. Fitzgerald Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule , 2015 .

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  B. Lo Sharing clinical trial data: maximizing benefits, minimizing risk. , 2015, JAMA.

[14]  Mark Barnes,et al.  Preparing for responsible sharing of clinical trial data. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Lawrence O. Gostin,et al.  Code of Federal Regulations Title 45: Public Welfare Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects , 2007 .

[16]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  A critical appraisal of the Article 29 Working Party Opinion 05/2014 on data anonymization techniques , 2015 .