Validation of Geometric Accuracy of Global Land Survey (GLS) 2000 Data

Abstract The Global Land Survey (GLS) 2000 data were generated from Geocover™2000 data with the aim of producing a global data set of accuracy better than 25 m Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). An assessment and validation of accuracy of GLS 2000 data set, and its co-registration with Geocover™ 2000 data set is presented here. Since the availability of global data sets that have higher nominal accuracy than the GLS 2000 is a concern, the data sets were assessed in three tiers. In the first tier, the data were compared with the Geocover™2000 data. This comparison provided a means of localizing regions of higher differences. In the second tier, the GLS 2000 data were compared with systematically corrected Landsat-7 scenes that were obtained in a time period when the spacecraft pointing information was extremely accurate. These comparisons localize regions where the data are consistently off, which may indicate regions of higher errors. The third tier consisted of comparing the GLS 2000 data against higher accuracy reference data. The reference data were the Digital Ortho Quads over the United States, ortho-rectified SPOT data over Australia, and high accuracy check points obtained using triangulation bundle adjustment of Landsat-7 images over selected sites around the world. The study reveals that the geometric errors in Geocover™2000 data have been rectified in GLS 2000 data, and that the accuracy of GLS 2000 data can be expected to be better than 25 m RMSE for most of its constituent scenes.

[1]  G. Chander,et al.  Assessment of the NASA–USGS Global Land Survey (GLS) datasets , 2013 .

[2]  Joshua Greenfeld,et al.  EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTO QUADRANGLES (DOQ) IN THE CONTEXT OF PARCEL-BASED GIS , 2001 .

[3]  Kara Holekamp,et al.  Geopositional Accuracy Assessment of EarthSat GeoCover Landsat Orthorectified Imagery , 2003 .

[4]  C. Tucker,et al.  NASA’s Global Orthorectified Landsat Data Set , 2004 .

[5]  Jeffrey G. Masek,et al.  Large Area Scene Selection Interface (LASSI): Methodology of Selecting Landsat Imagery for the Global Land Survey 2005. , 2009 .

[6]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  Practical Statistics for the Analytical Scientist , 2009 .

[7]  James Anthony Lutes,et al.  Error propagation in Ikonos mapping blocks , 2004 .

[8]  Kaichang Di,et al.  Integration of Ikonos and QuickBird Imagery for Geopositioning Accuracy Analysis , 2007 .

[9]  Manuel A. Aguilar,et al.  Geopositioning Accuracy Assessment of GeoEye-1 Panchromatic and Multispectral Imagery , 2012 .

[10]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  Practical Statistics for the Analytical Scientist: A Bench Guide , 2009 .

[11]  James C. Storey,et al.  Four years of Landsat-7 on-orbit geometric calibration and performance , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  P. Reinartz,et al.  Automated Georeferencing of Optical Satellite Data with Integrated Sensor Model Improvement , 2012 .

[13]  C. Justice,et al.  Towards monitoring land-cover and land-use changes at a global scale: the global land survey 2005 , 2008 .

[14]  Thierry Toutin Block Bundle Adjustment of Landsat 7 ETM+ Images over Mountainous Areas , 2003 .

[15]  Marco Gianinetto,et al.  Automated Geometric Correction of High-resolution Pushbroom Satellite Data , 2008 .

[16]  Changjae Kim,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of Sensor Modeling Alternatives for High Resolution Imaging Satellites , 2007 .