Measurement of Longitudinal β-Amyloid Change with 18F-Florbetapir PET and Standardized Uptake Value Ratios

The accurate measurement of β-amyloid (Aβ) change using amyloid PET imaging is important for Alzheimer disease research and clinical trials but poses several unique challenges. In particular, reference region measurement instability may lead to spurious changes in cortical regions of interest. To optimize our ability to measure 18F-florbetapir longitudinal change, we evaluated several candidate regions of interest and their influence on cortical florbetapir change over a 2-y period in participants from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Methods: We examined the agreement in cortical florbetapir change detected using 6 candidate reference regions (cerebellar gray matter, whole cerebellum, brain stem/pons, eroded subcortical white matter [WM], and 2 additional combinations of these regions) in 520 ADNI subjects. We used concurrent cerebrospinal fluid Aβ1–42 measurements to identify subgroups of ADNI subjects expected to remain stable over follow-up (stable Aβ group; n = 14) and subjects expected to increase (increasing Aβ group; n = 91). We then evaluated reference regions according to whether cortical change was minimal in the stable Aβ group and cortical retention increased in the increasing Aβ group. Results: There was poor agreement across reference regions in the amount of cortical change observed across all 520 ADNI subjects. Within the stable Aβ group, however, cortical florbetapir change was 1%–2% across all reference regions, indicating high consistency. In the increasing Aβ group, cortical increases were significant with all reference regions. Reference regions containing WM (as opposed to cerebellum or pons) enabled detection of cortical change that was more physiologically plausible and more likely to increase over time. Conclusion: Reference region selection has an important influence on the detection of florbetapir change. Compared with cerebellum or pons alone, reference regions that included subcortical WM resulted in change measurements that are more accurate. In addition, because use of WM-containing reference regions involves dividing out cortical signal contained in the reference region (via partial-volume effects), use of these WM-containing regions may result in more conservative estimates of actual change. Future analyses using different tracers, tracer–kinetic models, pipelines, and comparisons with other biomarkers will further optimize our ability to accurately measure Aβ changes over time.

[1]  L. Thurfjell,et al.  Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease: a comparison of three radiotracers , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  Nick C Fox,et al.  11C-PiB PET assessment of change in fibrillar amyloid-β load in patients with Alzheimer's disease treated with bapineuzumab: a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[3]  John Seibyl,et al.  Improved longitudinal [18F]-AV45 amyloid PET by white matter reference and VOI-based partial volume effect correction , 2015, NeuroImage.

[4]  V. Narayan,et al.  Optimizing regions-of-interest composites for capturing treatment effects on brain amyloid in clinical trials. , 2014, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[5]  James Robert Brašić,et al.  In Vivo Imaging of Amyloid Deposition in Alzheimer Disease Using the Radioligand 18F-AV-45 (Flobetapir F 18) , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  M. Mintun,et al.  Comparing positron emission tomography imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measurements of β‐amyloid , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[7]  W. Jagust,et al.  Association of lifetime cognitive engagement and low β-amyloid deposition. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[8]  Andrei G. Vlassenko,et al.  Amyloid‐beta plaque growth in cognitively normal adults: Longitudinal [11C]Pittsburgh compound B data , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Cindee M. Madison,et al.  Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal-mediated beta-amyloid deposition in elderly subjects. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  C. Rowe,et al.  Comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetaben for Aβ imaging in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  M. Mintun,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Amyloid PET with Florbetapir F 18 in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitively Normal Subjects , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  R. Petersen,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[13]  M. Mintun,et al.  Amyloid-β Imaging with Pittsburgh Compound B and Florbetapir: Comparing Radiotracers and Quantification Methods , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  H. Engler,et al.  PET imaging of amyloid deposition in patients with mild cognitive impairment , 2008, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  E. Salmon,et al.  18F‐flutemetamol amyloid imaging in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment: A phase 2 trial , 2010, Annals of neurology.

[16]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Test-retest variability of quantitative [11C]PIB studies in Alzheimer’s disease , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh Compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  R. Coleman,et al.  Use of florbetapir-PET for imaging beta-amyloid pathology. , 2011, JAMA.

[19]  Robert A. Dean,et al.  Qualification of the analytical and clinical performance of CSF biomarker analyses in ADNI , 2011, Acta Neuropathologica.