Is digit ratio (2D:4D) associated with a religious profession? An exploratory study on male Polish seminary students

Human females demonstrate higher religiosity than men in populations. Digit ratio (2D:4D), being a putative indicator of prenatal testosterone, is associated in varying degrees with characters that show sexual dimorphism. A small number of studies have indicated that religiosity may be associated with the biological basis of sex differences in humans. The objective of the present study was to ascertain whether 2D:4D in religiously oriented seminary students is different from individuals in other occupations. The study followed a cross-sectional design. Male participants of the study included 13 seminary students, 18 military chaplains and 91 control students from study courses relating to civil occupations. Lengths of second (2D) and fourth (4D) digits and their ratio (2D:4D) for each hand, height and weight were the variables and 2D:4D was the outcome measure. The results demonstrated that the seminary students had significantly higher 2D:4D than both the military chaplains and civil students. The military chaplains had the lowest 2D:4D. The study also revealed that the choice of religious occupation, and for that matter, religiosity, could be linked with the prenatal hormonal environment, particularly lower intrauterine testosterone compared to oestrogen.

[1]  A. Tomaszewska,et al.  2D:4D digit ratio and its relationship to BMI, sporting choices and physiological predispositions among women , 2022, Anthropological Review.

[2]  R. Trivers,et al.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) and body mass index in the BBC Internet Study: prenatal sex steroids and a Trivers-Willard effect on body composition. , 2021, Journal of biosocial science.

[3]  G. Nave,et al.  No evidence for a difference in 2D:4D ratio between youth with elevated prenatal androgen exposure due to congenital adrenal hyperplasia and controls , 2020, Hormones and Behavior.

[4]  A. Hood,et al.  Gender , 2019, Textile History.

[5]  J. Hoffmann.  Risk Preference Theory and Gender Differences in Religiousness: A Replication and Extension , 2019, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[6]  O. Robinson,et al.  Age and Cultural Gender Equality as Moderators of the Gender Difference in the Importance of Religion and Spirituality: Comparing the United Kingdom, France, and Germany , 2018, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[7]  Aniruddha Das.  Are Men’s Religious Ties Hormonally Regulated? , 2018, Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology.

[8]  G. Richards.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) and beliefs in superstitions, conspiracy theories and the paranormal , 2017, PsyPag Quarterly.

[9]  Malini Ratnasingam,et al.  Testosterone, Risk Taking, and Religiosity: Evidence from Two Cultures , 2016 .

[10]  D. Schmitt,et al.  On the varieties of sexual experience: Cross-cultural links between religiosity and human mating strategies. , 2015 .

[11]  M. Hines,et al.  Early androgen exposure and human gender development , 2015, Biology of Sex Differences.

[12]  Siobhan McAndrew,et al.  Modernization and the gender gap in religiosity: Evidence from cross-national European surveys , 2013 .

[13]  R. Bergès,et al.  Environmental levels of oestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  S. Bruce,et al.  Why are Women more Religious than Men , 2012 .

[15]  G. Charness,et al.  Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking , 2012 .

[16]  P. Halama,et al.  Gender differences in the relationship between religiosity and health-related behaviour among adolescents , 2012, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[17]  J. Manning.  Resolving the role of prenatal sex steroids in the development of digit ratio , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  M. Cohn,et al.  Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Johannes Hönekopp.  Relationships between digit ratio 2D:4D and self-reported aggression and risk taking in an online study , 2011 .

[20]  Justin R. Sydnor,et al.  Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes , 2011 .

[21]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Sexually dimorphic traits (digit ratio, body height, systemizing-empathizing scores) and gender segregation between occupations: Evidence from the BBC internet study , 2010 .

[22]  R. Hart,et al.  Maternal and umbilical cord androgen concentrations do not predict digit ratio (2D:4D) in girls: A prospective cohort study , 2010, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[23]  Paola Sapienza,et al.  Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Martin Voracek,et al.  Who wants to believe? Associations between digit ratio (2D:4D) and paranormal and superstitious beliefs , 2009 .

[25]  S. Van Dongen,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Prenatal Digit Ratio (2D:4D) , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[26]  C. Apicella,et al.  Testosterone and financial risk preferences , 2008 .

[27]  B. Fink,et al.  Digit ratio (2D:4D), dominance, reproductive success, asymmetry, and sociosexuality in the BBC Internet Study , 2008, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[28]  J. Freese,et al.  The Devil made her do it? Evaluating Risk Preference as an Explanation of Sex Differences in Religiousness , 2007 .

[29]  L. Roth,et al.  Risky Business: Assessing Risk Preference Explanations for Gender Differences in Religiosity , 2007 .

[30]  M. Lindeman,et al.  Paranormal beliefs: their dimensionality and correlates , 2006 .

[31]  D. Sullins.  Gender and Religion: Deconstructing Universality, Constructing Complexity1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  K. Desdicioglu,et al.  Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). , 2006, Early human development.

[33]  Christine R. Harris,et al.  Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take Fewer Risks than Men? , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[34]  D. Lieberman,et al.  The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  S. Berenbaum,et al.  Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: methods and findings , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  R. Stark.  Physiology and Faith: Addressing the “Universal” Gender Difference in Religious Commitment , 2002 .

[37]  A. Orenstein.  Religion and Paranormal Belief , 2002 .

[38]  Alan S. Miller,et al.  Gender and Religiousness: Can Socialization Explanations Be Saved?1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[40]  J T Manning,et al.  The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[41]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[42]  Alan S. Miller,et al.  Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity , 1995 .

[43]  P. Reed,et al.  2D:4D digit ratio and religiosity in university student and general population samples. , 2018, Transpersonal psychology review.

[44]  P. Rogers,et al.  2D:4D digit ratio and types of adult paranormal belief: An attempted replication and extension of Voracek (2009) with a UK sample , 2017 .

[45]  P. Rogers,et al.  2D:4D digit ratio and types of adult paranormal belief: An attempted replication and extension of Voracek (2009) with a UK sample , 2017 .

[46]  Sulaiman Olanrewaju Adebayo,et al.  Religiosity, Paranormal Beliefs, and Psychopathological Symptoms in Two Ethnic Samples , 2014 .

[47]  D. Sullins.  Gender and Religiousness: Deconstructing Universality, Constructing Complexity , 2006 .

[48]  John R. Williams.  DECLARATION OF HELSINKI , 1964 .