The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses

Using a corpus-based approach, this paper investigates the construction of stance in finite reporting clauses with that-clause complementation. The data are drawn from two corpora of theses in contrasting disciplines: a social science—politics—and a natural science—materials science. A network for the analysis of reporting clauses is presented which sets out the major alternatives available to academic writers and enables stance to be linked systematically to grammatical and semantic patterns of use. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the data leads to the identification of an important, but somewhat under-researched, function of reporting clauses in academic writing: their use to report the writer's own work. Drawing on the notions of averral and attribution, the paper shows how writers can emphasize or hide their responsibility for their own propositions and thereby construct a stance which differs according to the epistemology and ideology of the discipline concerned. These reporting clauses play a key role in the construction of major claims, with greater writer visibility seen in politics than materials. However, despite the superficial objectivity and impersonality of writing in the natural sciences, it is argued that skilled exploitation of the interplay between averral and attribution allows writers to construct a stance that is both clear and pervasive.

[1]  M. Charles ‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines , 2003 .

[2]  G. Myers ‘In this paper we report …'’: Speech acts and scientific facts , 1992 .

[3]  Geoff Thompson,et al.  Voices in the Text: Discourse Perspectives on Language Reports , 1996 .

[4]  P. Tucker,et al.  Evaluation in the art-historical research article , 2003 .

[5]  F. Salager-Meyer A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts , 1992 .

[6]  P. Thetela,et al.  Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles , 1997 .

[7]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[8]  Suganthi John,et al.  The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun ☆ , 1999 .

[9]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Adverbial stance types in English , 1988 .

[10]  G. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. , 1991 .

[11]  Maggie Charles,et al.  Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines , 2006 .

[12]  K. Hyland,et al.  HUMBLE SERVANTS OF THE DISCIPLINE? SELF-MENTION IN RESEARCH ARTICLES , 2001 .

[13]  Peter Crompton,et al.  Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems , 1997 .

[14]  K. Hyland,et al.  Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing , 2002 .

[15]  M. Stubbs Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture , 1996 .

[16]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[17]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[18]  Dacia F. Dressen,et al.  Geologists’ implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence , 2003 .

[19]  Thomas Hawes,et al.  Reporting verbs in medical journal articles , 1994 .

[20]  A. Pennycook The politics of pronouns , 1994 .

[21]  K. Hyland,et al.  Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles , 1996 .

[22]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Activity and evaluation: reporting practices in academic writing , 2002 .

[23]  Chih-Hua Kuo,et al.  The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles. , 1999 .

[24]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse , 2002 .

[25]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in scientific research articles , 1998 .

[26]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[27]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[28]  Susan Hunston Professional Conflict — Disagreement in Academic Discourse , 1993 .

[29]  Françoise Salager-Meyer,et al.  Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse , 1994 .

[30]  Philip Shaw Reasons for the Correlation of Voice, Tense, and Sentence Function in Reporting Verbs. , 1992 .

[31]  K. Hyland,et al.  Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge. , 1999 .

[32]  D. Biber,et al.  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .

[33]  S. Hunston A corpus study of some English verbs of attribution , 1995 .

[34]  Paul L. Simpson Modality in Literary-Critical Discourse , 1990 .

[35]  D. Biber,et al.  Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect , 1989 .

[36]  Elaine Tarone,et al.  ON THE USE OF THE PASSIVE IN TWO ASTROPHYSICS JOURNAL PAPERS , 1981 .