Statistical shape models for segmentation and structural analysis

Biomedical imaging of large patient populations, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, is becoming a standard technique for noninvasive, in-vivo studies of the pathophysiology of diseases and for monitoring drug treatment. In radiation oncology, imaging and extraction of anatomical organ geometry is a routine procedure for therapy planning an monitoring, and similar procedures are vital for surgical planning and image-guided therapy. Bottlenecks of today's studies, often processed by labor-intensive manual region drawing, are the lack of efficient, reliable tools for three-dimensional organ segmentation and for advanced morphologic characterization. This paper discusses current research and development focused towards building of statistical shape models, used for automatic model-based segmentation and for shape analysis and discrimination. We build statistical shape models which describe the geometric variability and image intensity characteristics of anatomical structures. New segmentations are obtained by model deformation driven by local image match forces and constrained by the training statistics. Two complimentary representations for 3D shape are discussed and compared, one based on global surface parametrization and a second one on medial manifold description. The discussion will be guided by presenting a most recent study to construct a statistical shape model of the caudate structure.

[1]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Multi-scale 3-D Deformable Model Segmentation Based on Medial Description , 2001, IPMI.

[2]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Ligature Instabilities in the Perceptual Organization of Shape , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Ali Shokoufandeh,et al.  Shock Graphs and Shape Matching , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Martin Styner,et al.  Three-dimensional medial shape representation incorporating object variability , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[5]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[7]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  The Use of Active Shape Models for Locating Structures in Medical Images , 1993, IPMI.

[9]  M. Styner,et al.  Hybrid boundary-medial shape description for biologically variable shapes , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis. MMBIA-2000 (Cat. No.PR00737).

[10]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Deformable Fourier models for surface finding in 3-D images , 1992, Other Conferences.

[11]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Elastic model-based segmentation of 3-D neuroradiological data sets , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Martin Styner,et al.  Shape versus Size: Improved Understanding of the Morphology of Brain Structures , 2001, MICCAI.

[13]  Christian Michael Brechbühler.  Description and analysis of 3-D shapes by parametrization of closed surfaces , 1995 .

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[15]  Douglas W. Jones,et al.  Shape analysis of brain ventricles using SPHARM , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[16]  Markus Ilg,et al.  Voronoi skeletons: theory and applications , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[18]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Segmentation of 2-D and 3-D objects from MRI volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible Fourier contour and surface models , 1996, Medical Image Anal..