Control structure design and robust model predictive control for controlling a proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Abstract In this work, cell performance analysis, concept of control structure design, and controller design for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) were implemented. Steady-state analysis was performed to determine suitable operating conditions. The effects of the input parameters on cell voltage and cell temperature were analyzed to investigate the dynamic behavior of a PEMFC that is important for control design. To obtain an efficient control system, the control structure design of the PEMFC was also considered to find suitable controlled and manipulated variables. Moreover, the selection of input-output pairings by considering the relative gain array (RGA) as a controllability index was applied to the control system design. Finally, model predictive control and offline robust model predictive control (MPC) based on a linear time-varying model were proposed for PEMFC control. The results showed that the steady-state operating points were selected at the current density = 0.51 A/cm 2 , cell voltage = 0.59 V, power density = 0.30 W/cm 2 , and cell temperature = 332 K. The cell voltage and cell temperature depend on the inlet molar flow rates, temperature of hydrogen and air, and operating current density. According to the RGA, the inlet molar flow rates of air and hydrogen are manipulated variables that regulate the cell temperature and partial pressure of hydrogen, respectively. Furthermore, controller design using MPC and robust MPC as a controller can demonstrate good results. Robust MPC can guarantee the stability of the PEMFC.

[1]  Eduardo López,et al.  Dynamic modeling and controllability analysis of an ethanol reformer for fuel cell application , 2010 .

[2]  Simon Harvey,et al.  Biomass gasification-based syngas production for a conventional oxo synthesis plant—greenhouse gas emission balances and economic evaluation , 2015 .

[3]  Jeremy Hall,et al.  Innovation dynamics and environmental technologies: the emergence of fuel cell technology , 2003 .

[4]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Integration of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell in a sugar–ethanol factory: analysis of the efficiency and the environmental profile of the products , 2011 .

[5]  Amornchai Arpornwichanop,et al.  Robust Model Predictive Control Strategy for LTV and LPV Systems of the Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell , 2015 .

[6]  P. R. Pathapati,et al.  A new dynamic model for predicting transient phenomena in a PEM fuel cell system , 2005 .

[7]  Amornchai Arpornwichanop,et al.  Control structure design and dynamic modeling for a solid oxide fuel cell with direct internal reforming of methane , 2015 .

[8]  Carlos Bordons,et al.  Nonlinear MPC for the airflow in a PEM fuel cell using a Volterra series model , 2012 .

[9]  Shih-Ming Chang,et al.  Transient behavior of a PEMFC , 2006 .

[10]  Jack Brouwer,et al.  Quasi-three dimensional dynamic model of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell for system and controls development , 2007 .

[11]  Ravindra D. Gudi,et al.  Dynamic analysis and linear control strategies for proton exchange membrane fuel cell using a distributed parameter model , 2007 .

[12]  Takuya Taniuchi,et al.  Simulation of the current density distribution for a PEMFC by using measured electrochemical and physical properties of the membrane , 2005 .

[13]  B. Gou,et al.  Feedback-Linearization-Based Nonlinear Control for PEM Fuel Cells , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[14]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Allocating carbon dioxide emissions from cogeneration systems: descriptions of selected output-based methods. , 2008 .

[15]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Hydrogen technological innovation systems in practice: comparing Danish and American approaches to fuel cell development , 2015 .

[16]  Ruey-Wen Liu.  Convergent systems , 1968 .

[17]  S.-M. Beheshti,et al.  An advanced biomass gasification–proton exchange membrane fuel cell system for power generation , 2016 .

[18]  Amornchai Arpornwichanop,et al.  Study on a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System Fuelled by a Mixture of Bio-ethanol and Methane , 2014 .

[19]  Christian Sartorius,et al.  Promotion of stationary fuel cells on the basis of subjectively perceived barriers and drivers , 2008 .

[20]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Robust constrained model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[21]  Gabriele Pannocchia,et al.  Robust model predictive control with guaranteed setpoint tracking , 2004 .

[22]  F. Dorado,et al.  Nonlinear control of the air feed of a fuel cell , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[23]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Control structure design for complete chemical plants , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[24]  Robert van den Hoed,et al.  Sources of radical technological innovation: the emergence of fuel cell technology in the automotive industry , 2007 .

[25]  Johan Löfberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004 .

[26]  J. C. Amphlett,et al.  A model predicting transient responses of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 1996 .

[27]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .