Low flow controls on benthic and hyporheic macroinvertebrate assemblages during supra‐seasonal drought

Despite the widely accepted importance of the hyporheic zone as a habitat for stream macroinvertebrates during floods, few data exist regarding community composition and distribution during periods of low flow or drought in perennial streamsi Integrating research on hyporheic invertebrates with results from a long-term study of a U K river provided the opportunity to examine how surface and hyporheic macroinvertebrate communities respond to inter-annual variability in river flow and periods of groundwater drought. Changes in the riverine macroinvertebrate community associated with low flow included a reduction in species richness and the number of individuals per sample, particularly aquatic insects. The hyporheic community was characterized by a relatively homogeneous composition during a period of severe low flow, punctuated by short-term changes associated with variation in water temperature rather than changes in discharge. We present a conceptual model of the processes influencing benthic and hyporheic invertebrates under low-flow conditions. Previous studies have seldom integrated these two assemblages and their interactions. The model presented highlights the potential importance of surface water and hyporheic zone linkages for riverine invertebrate communities under a range of flow conditions.

[1]  R. Death,et al.  Do stream macroinvertebrates use instream refugia in response to severe short‐term flow reduction in New Zealand streams? , 2008 .

[2]  C. Extence.  The effect of drought on benthic invertebrate communities in a lowland river , 1981, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  T. Bo,et al.  Deep Interstitial Habitat as a Refuge for Agabus paludosus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) During Summer Droughts , 2006 .

[4]  E. Stanley,et al.  Hyporheic processes during flooding and drying in a Sonoran Desert stream. II: Faunal dynamics , 1995 .

[5]  P. Armitage,et al.  The response of the macroinvertebrate community to low-flow variability and supra-seasonal drought within a groundwater dominated stream , 2004 .

[6]  L. Deharveng,et al.  Subterranean Ecosystems: A Truncated Functional Biodiversity , 2002 .

[7]  G. Petts,et al.  Low flows and recovery of macroinvertebrates in a small regulated chalk stream , 1994 .

[8]  R. Death,et al.  A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  Bernd Spänhoff,et al.  An experimental assessment of the effectiveness of gravel cleaning operations in improving hyporheic water quality in potential salmonid spawning areas , 2008 .

[10]  C. Mason,et al.  Long-term trends in water quality and their impact on macroinvertebrate assemblages in eutrophic lowland rivers. , 2003, Water research.

[11]  P. Harris,et al.  Underground Dispersal by Amphipods (Crangonyx pseudogracilis) between Temporary Ponds , 2002 .

[12]  B. Caruso.  Temporal and spatial patterns of extreme low flows and effects on stream ecosystems in Otago, New Zealand , 2002 .

[13]  J. Wright,et al.  A nine-year study of the macroinvertebrate fauna of a chalk stream , 1999 .

[14]  Vladimir U. Smakhtin,et al.  Droughts : The impact of semantics and perceptions , 2008 .

[15]  T. Battin.  Hydrodynamics is a major determinant of streambed biofilm activity: From the sediment to the reach scale , 2000 .

[16]  Andrew J. Boulton,et al.  Hyporheic rehabilitation in rivers: restoring vertical connectivity , 2007 .

[17]  Marie-José Dole-Olivier,et al.  Patch distribution of interstitial communities: prevailing factors , 1992 .

[18]  P. Lake,et al.  The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. I. Multivariate analyses of physicochemical features , 1990 .

[19]  Joseph L. Thorley,et al.  Long-residence groundwater effects on incubating salmonid eggs: low hyporheic oxygen impairs embryo development , 2004 .

[20]  D. Lytle,et al.  Adaptation to natural flow regimes. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  R. Naiman,et al.  Nitrate removal in the hyporheic zone of a salmon river in Alaska , 2009 .

[22]  V. Resh,et al.  Benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and macrohabitat connectivity in Mediterranean-climate streams of northern California , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[23]  D. Hannah,et al.  Catchment‐scale controls on groundwater–surface water interactions in the hyporheic zone: implications for salmon embryo survival , 2005 .

[24]  P. Marmonier,et al.  Nitrogen dynamics in rural streams : differences between geomorphologic units , 2006 .

[25]  M. Brunke.  Colmation and Depth Filtration within Streambeds: Retention of Particles in Hyporheic Interstices , 1999, International Review of Hydrobiology.

[26]  J. Marxsen,et al.  Bacterial production in the carbon flow of a central European stream, the Breitenbach , 2006 .

[27]  Darren S. Baldwin,et al.  Drought and aquatic ecosystems: an introduction , 2003 .

[28]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  Major droughts in England and Wales, 1800–2006 , 2007 .

[29]  Andrew J. Boulton,et al.  Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages , 2003 .

[30]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading , 2008, Nature.

[31]  R. Lim,et al.  Hyporheic macroinvertebrates in riffle and pool areas of temporary streams in south eastern Australia , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[32]  D. Williams.  The Ecology of Temporary Waters , 1987 .

[33]  P. Lake.  Flow‐Generated Disturbances and Ecological Responses: Floods and Droughts , 2008 .

[34]  S. Fisher,et al.  Response of a Hyporheic Invertebrate Assemblage to Drying Disturbance in a Desert Stream , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[35]  David M. Hannah,et al.  Macroinvertebrate community response to inter‐annual and regional river flow regime dynamics , 2008 .

[36]  P. Wood,et al.  Flow permanence and macroinvertebrate community diversity within groundwater dominated headwater streams and springs , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[37]  P. M. Wade,et al.  Influences of environmental conditions on macrophyte communities in drought‐affected headwater streams , 2006 .

[38]  V. Smakhtin.  Low flow hydrology: a review , 2001 .

[39]  P. Cook,et al.  Deliberate omission or unfortunate oversight: Should stygofaunal surveys be included in routine groundwater monitoring programs? , 2007 .

[40]  T. Bo,et al.  Effects of clogging on stream macroinvertebrates: An experimental approach , 2007 .

[41]  D. Williams.  The biology of temporary waters. , 2005 .

[42]  T. Marsh.  The 2004–2006 drought in southern Britain , 2007 .

[43]  Emily H. Stanley,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HYPORHEIC ZONE IN STREAMS AND RIVERS , 1998 .

[44]  I. Jowett,et al.  Effects of floods versus low flows on invertebrates in a New Zealand gravel‐bed river , 2006 .

[45]  R. Clarke,et al.  The Distribution of Benthic and Hyporheic Macroinvertebrates from the Heads and Tails of Riffles , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[46]  G. Fox,et al.  Hyporheic and total transient storage in small, sand‐bed streams , 2008 .

[47]  P. S. Lake.  Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters , 2003 .

[48]  Benthic community dynamics during summer low‐flows in two rivers of contrasting enrichment 2. Invertebrates , 2003 .

[49]  D. Ehrenfeld.  The landscape perspective , 1995 .

[50]  M. Harvey,et al.  Biodiversity, functional roles and ecosystem services of groundwater invertebrates , 2008 .

[51]  J. Wright,et al.  Ecological effects of groundwater pumping and a natural drought on the upper reaches of a chalk stream , 1987 .

[52]  P. S. Lake,et al.  The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. II. Comparisons of faunal composition between habitats, rivers and years , 1992 .

[53]  E. Stanley,et al.  Hyporheic processes during flooding and drying in a Sonoran Desert stream. I: Hydrologic and chemical dynamics , 1995 .

[54]  S. Larned,et al.  Lateral and longitudinal patterns within the stygoscape of an alluvial river corridor , 2008 .

[55]  G. Petts,et al.  Flow variations and macroinvertebrate community responses in a small groundwater-dominated stream in south-east England , 2000 .

[56]  A. Boulton.  OVER-SUMMERING REFUGES OF AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES IN TWO INTERMITTENT STREAMS IN CENTRAL VICTORIA AUSTRALIA , 1989 .

[57]  David M. Hannah,et al.  A comparison of forest and moorland stream microclimate, heat exchanges and thermal dynamics , 2008 .

[58]  S. Hendricks,et al.  Microbial Ecology of the Hyporheic Zone: A Perspective Integrating Hydrology and Biology , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[59]  G. Petts,et al.  The influence of drought on chalk stream macroinvertebrates , 1999 .

[60]  F. Sabater,et al.  Drought and postdrought recovery cycles in an intermittent Mediterranean stream: structural and functional aspects , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[61]  V. Resh,et al.  Invertebrates in intermittent and perennial streams: is the hyporheic zone a refuge from drying? , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[62]  Klement Tockner,et al.  A landscape perspective of surface-subsurface hydrological exchanges in river corridors , 2002 .

[63]  J. Stanford,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Alluvial Rivers: Connectivity and the Hyporheic Corridor , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[64]  A. Boulton,et al.  The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia.: III. Temporal changes in faunal composition , 1992 .

[65]  J. Prior,et al.  The record‐breaking heat and sunshine of July 2006 , 2007 .

[66]  Jeremy B. Jones,et al.  Effects of drought and a hurricane on a coastal headwater stream , 1994 .