Detecting multivariate cross-correlation between brain regions.

The problem of identifying functional connectivity from multiple time series data recorded in each of two or more brain areas arises in many neuroscientific investigations. For a single stationary time series in each of two brain areas statistical tools such as cross-correlation and Granger causality may be applied. On the other hand, to examine multivariate interactions at a single time point, canonical correlation, which finds the linear combinations of signals that maximize the correlation, may be used. We report here a new method that produces interpretations much like these standard techniques and, in addition, 1) extends the idea of canonical correlation to 3-way arrays (with dimensionality number of signals by number of time points by number of trials), 2) allows for nonstationarity, 3) also allows for nonlinearity, 4) scales well as the number of signals increases, and 5) captures predictive relationships, as is done with Granger causality. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through simulation studies and illustrate by analyzing local field potentials recorded from a behaving primate. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Multiple signals recorded from each of multiple brain regions may contain information about cross-region interactions. This article provides a method for visualizing the complicated interdependencies contained in these signals and assessing them statistically. The method combines signals optimally but allows the resulting measure of dependence to change, both within and between regions, as the responses evolve dynamically across time. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through numerical simulations and by uncovering a novel connectivity pattern between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex during a declarative memory task.

[1]  G. F. Tremblay,et al.  The Prefrontal Cortex , 1989, Neurology.

[2]  H. Hotelling Relations Between Two Sets of Variates , 1936 .

[3]  E. Miller,et al.  Frequency-specific hippocampal-prefrontal interactions during associative learning , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Canonical Correlation Analysis: An Overview with Application to Learning Methods , 2004, Neural Computation.

[5]  Xue Wang,et al.  Estimating Granger causality after stimulus onset: A cautionary note , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Seth,et al.  Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: Theoretical invariance and practical application , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Wei Wang,et al.  Characterizing global statistical significance of spatiotemporal hot spots in magnetoencephalography/ electroencephalography source space via excursion algorithms , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Temporal kernel CCA and its application in multimodal neuronal data analysis , 2010, Machine Learning.

[9]  Howard Eichenbaum,et al.  Bidirectional prefrontal-hippocampal interactions support context-guided memory , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[11]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[12]  Haiping Lu,et al.  Learning Canonical Correlations of Paired Tensor Sets Via Tensor-to-Vector Projection , 2013, IJCAI.

[13]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Assessing Granger Causality in Electrophysiological Data: Removing the Adverse Effects of Common Signals via Bipolar Derivations , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[14]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing MEG Data with Granger Causality: Promises and Pitfalls , 2019, Magnetoencephalography.

[15]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  R. Kass,et al.  Characterizing Global Statistical Significance of Spatio-Temporal Hot Spots in MEG / EEG Source Space via Excursion Algorithms , 2011 .

[17]  Peter Willett,et al.  What is a tutorial , 2013 .

[18]  E. Miller,et al.  Prefrontal Cortex Networks Shift from External to Internal Modes during Learning , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen,et al.  A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..