Experimental and numerical study of the effects of the oxygen index on the radiation characteristics of laminar coflow diffusion flames

Abstract The oxygen concentration in the oxidizer stream (O2 + N2) of laminar coflow ethylene diffusion flames is varied from 17% to 35% in order to study its influence on the flame height, the soot formation/oxidation processes, the smoke point characteristics, and the vertical distributions of radiative flux at a distance of 6.85 cm from the flame axis. Measured values for all the investigated parameters are compared with the predictions provided by a numerical model based on a two-equation semiempirical acetylene-based soot model and on the statistical narrow-band correlated-k model to compute thermal radiation. Predictions are in overall reasonable agreement with the experiments for oxygen indices in the range 19–35%, whereas all the investigated parameters are significantly underestimated for an oxygen index of 17%. Measured flame heights based on CH∗ emission below, at, or slightly above the smoke point, as well as predicted stoichiometric flame heights, are found to be proportional to ζ = V ˙ f [ D ∞ ln ( 1 + 1 / S ) ] - 1 ( T ∞ / T ad ) 0.67 , where V ˙ f , D∞, S, and Tad are the volumetric flow rate of ethylene, the diffusion coefficient at ambient temperature, the stoichiometric molecular air-to-fuel ratio, and the adiabatic flame temperature. Soot formation processes are found to increase with the oxygen index, leading to higher values of the maximum soot volume fraction and the peak integrated soot volume fraction. In addition, the latter is reached at a nondimensional height (normalized by ζ of approximately 0.05, regardless of the oxygen index within the investigated range. Two regimes are evidenced: The first regime, occurring for oxygen indices lower than 25%, is dominated by soot oxidation and is characterized by an enhancement in both the maximum soot volume fraction and the fuel flow rate at the smoke point with the oxygen index. The second regime, occurring for oxygen indices higher than 25%, is dominated by soot formation; the rate of increase in the maximum soot volume fraction with the oxygen concentration is lower than in the first regime, whereas the fuel flow rate at the smoke point decreases. Finally, the peak of radiative flux increases with the oxygen index, but its rate of increase is also found to be considerably reduced for oxygen indices greater than 25%.

[1]  F. Takahashi,et al.  Extinguishment of methane diffusion flames by carbon dioxide in coflow air and oxygen-enriched microgravity environments , 2008 .

[2]  S. Chung,et al.  Growth of soot particles in counterflow diffusion flames of ethylene , 2001 .

[3]  A. Fuentes,et al.  MODELING RADIATIVE HEAT TRANSFER IN SOOTING LAMINAR COFLOW FLAMES , 2011 .

[4]  Anouar Soufiani,et al.  High temperature gas radiative property parameters of statistical narrow-band model for H2O, CO2 and CO, and correlated-K model for H2O and CO2 , 1997 .

[5]  W. C. Reynolds,et al.  The Element Potential Method for Chemical Equilibrium Analysis : Implementation in the Interactive Program STANJAN, Version 3 , 1986 .

[6]  S. Patankar.  Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[7]  F. G. Roper.  The prediction of laminar jet diffusion flame sizes: Part I. Theoretical model , 1977 .

[8]  D. Haworth,et al.  Modeling nongray gas-phase and soot radiation in luminous turbulent nonpremixed jet flames , 2005 .

[9]  C. P. Fenimore,et al.  Oxidation of soot by hydroxyl radicals , 1967 .

[10]  Kyle J Daun,et al.  Deconvolution of axisymmetric flame properties using Tikhonov regularization. , 2006, Applied optics.

[11]  Fouad Ammouri,et al.  Soot formation effects of oxygen concentration in the oxidizer stream of laminar coannular nonpremixed methane/air flames , 2000 .

[12]  M. Hafi,et al.  Effects of gas and soot radiation on soot formation in counterflow ethylene diffusion flames , 2004 .

[13]  G. Cox,et al.  Combustion fundamentals of fire , 1995 .

[14]  C. McEnally,et al.  Characterization of a coflowing methane/air non-premixed flame with computer modeling, rayleigh-raman imaging, and on-line mass spectrometry , 2000 .

[15]  R. Axelbaum,et al.  The Effect of Flame Structure on Soot-Particle Inception in Diffusion Flames , 1995 .

[16]  N. Peters,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of the influence of oxygen on soot formation in laminar counterflow flames of acetylene , 2000 .

[17]  Ö. Gülder,et al.  Soot formation and temperature field structure in laminar propane–air diffusion flames at elevated pressures , 2006 .

[18]  Hongsheng Guo,et al.  Numerical study on the influence of hydrogen addition on soot formation in a laminar ethylene-air diffusion flame , 2006 .

[19]  M. Modest,et al.  Assembly of full-spectrum k-distributions from a narrow-band database; effects of mixing gases, gases and nongray absorbing particles, and mixtures with nongray scatterers in nongray enclosures , 2004 .

[20]  Alexei V. Saveliev,et al.  Soot and NO formation in methane-oxygen enriched diffusion flames , 2001 .

[21]  H. Ross,et al.  Microgravity Combustion: Fire in Free Fall , 2002 .

[22]  J. B. Moss,et al.  Modelling soot formation in a laminar diffusion flame burning a surrogate kerosene fuel , 2007 .

[23]  J. Torero,et al.  Laser-induced incandescence calibration in a three-dimensional laminar diffusion flame , 2007 .

[24]  A. Fridman,et al.  Relative effect of acetylene and PAHs addition on soot formation in laminar diffusion flames of methane with oxygen and oxygen-enriched air , 2000 .

[25]  M. Thomson,et al.  A numerical study of soot aggregate formation in a laminar coflow diffusion flame , 2009 .

[26]  Nicholas A. Dembsey,et al.  Effect of oxygen on flame heat flux in horizontal and vertical orientations , 2008 .

[27]  G. Raithby,et al.  Prediction of radiative transfer in cylindrical enclosures with the finite volume method , 1992 .

[28]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Determination of the wavelength dependence of refractive indices of flame soot , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[29]  C. Law,et al.  The influence of carbon dioxide and oxygen as additives on soot formation in diffusion flames , 1991 .

[30]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  The Transport and Growth of Soot Particles in Laminar Diffusion Flames , 1987 .

[31]  Fengshan Liu,et al.  Soot and NO formation in counterflow ethylene/oxygen/nitrogen diffusion flames , 2004 .

[32]  Ian M. Kennedy,et al.  Sooting Counterflow Diffusion Flames with Varying Oxygen Index , 1984 .

[33]  P. S. Wyckoff,et al.  On the Adequacy of Certain Experimental Observables as Measurements of Flame Burning Rate , 1998 .

[34]  Glassman,et al.  The Effect of Oxygen Concentration on Sooting Diffusion Flames , 1980 .

[35]  Henning Bockhorn,et al.  Soot Formation in Combustion , 1994 .

[36]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Soot pyrometry using modulated absorption/emission , 2001 .

[37]  Ö. Gülder,et al.  The flame preheating effect on numerical modelling of soot formation in a two-dimensional laminar ethylene–air diffusion flame , 2002 .

[38]  A. Fuentes,et al.  Assessment of radiative property models in non-gray sooting media , 2011 .

[39]  R. Pitz,et al.  Computational and experimental study of oxygen-enhanced axisymmetric laminar methane flames , 2008 .

[40]  C. Dasch,et al.  One-dimensional tomography: a comparison of Abel, onion-peeling, and filtered backprojection methods. , 1992, Applied optics.

[41]  Vitali V. Lissianski,et al.  Combustion chemistry of propane: A case study of detailed reaction mechanism optimization , 2000 .