Revisiting James Madison University: A Case Analysis of Program Restructuring Following So Called ‘Title IX’ Cuts

The purpose of this study was to revisit one of the most highly publicized cases alleging Title IX harmed male athletes at James Madison University (JMU) following a decision that cuts would be made to the athletic program in 2006. Using budget data and publicly available information about the JMU athletic program, comparisons were made between the academic years 2006–2007 and 2010–2011. The authors conclude that the cuts in the JMU program were motivated far more by forces associated with the upward drift phenomenon in intercollegiate athletics, as evidenced in an institutional commitment to an expansion project costing $62 million for the football stadium in 2009 than concerns about Title IX. As the analysis reveals, despite public concern that Title IX had harmed male athletes, the athletic department restructuring at JMU did not increase opportunities for female athletes, did not result in the disappearance of men’s teams although those teams were demoted to club status, and did not inhibit the assump...

[1]  E. Weight,et al.  An Examination of Administrators' Nonrevenue, Olympic Program Values within NCAA Athletic Departments , 2011 .

[2]  Nancy Hogshead-Makar.  Hurricane Warning Flag for Olympic Sports: Compliance Practices in Biediger V. Quinnipiac University Signal a Risk to Women's and Men's Olympic Sports , 2011 .

[3]  S. Ware.  Game, Set, Match: Billie Jean King and the Revolution in Women's Sports , 2011 .

[4]  B. D. Ridpath,et al.  Changing Sides: The Failure of the Wrestling Community’s Challenges to Title IX and New Strategies for Saving NCAA Sport Teams , 2008 .

[5]  Theresa A. Walton,et al.  Triumph of Backlash: Wrestling Community and the “Problem” of Title IX , 2008 .

[6]  John J. Cheslock.  Who's Playing College Sports? Money, Race and Gender. , 2008 .

[7]  E. Staurowsky,et al.  College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA's Amateur Myth , 1998 .

[8]  C. Kerr.  The New Race to Be Harvard or Berkeley or Stanford. , 1991 .

[9]  Gail A. Herndon.  The chronicle of higher education , 1977 .

[10]  Erin E. Buzuvis,et al.  Equality Beyond the Three-Part Test: Exploring and Explaining the Invisibility of Title IX’s Equal Treatment Requirement , 2012 .

[11]  C. Pemberton.  More of the Same - Enough Already! , 2012 .

[12]  Patrick J. McAndrews.  Keeping Score: How Universities Can Comply with Title IX without Eliminating Men's Collegiate Athletics Programs , 2012 .

[13]  Anthony G. Weaver.  Reevaluating prestige: the influence of history on the decision to reclassify to Division I: a case study. , 2010 .

[14]  Stephen Parker,et al.  Inside higher education , 2009 .

[15]  A. Zimbalist,et al.  Equal play : Title IX and social change , 2007 .

[16]  Kristen Galles,et al.  In Defense of Title IX: Why Current Policies Are Required to Ensure Equality of Opportunity , 2003 .

[17]  Gerald A. Reynolds.  Further Clarificationof Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Guidance Regarding Title IX Compliance , 2003 .

[18]  Murray Sperber,et al.  Beer and circus : how big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education , 2000 .

[19]  H. M. Hughes,et al.  The daily press , 1943 .