Design Science in Information Systems Research

Two paradigms characterize much of the research in the Information Systems discipline: behavioral science and design science. The behavioral-science paradigm seeks to develop and verify theories that explain or predict human or organizational behavior. The design-science paradigm seeks to extend the boundaries of human and organizational capabilities by creating new and innovative artifacts. Both paradigms are foundational to the IS discipline, positioned as it is at the confluence of people, organizations, and technology. Our objective is to describe the performance of design-science research in Information Systems via a concise conceptual framework and clear guidelines for understanding, executing, and evaluating the research. In the design-science paradigm, knowledge and understanding of a problem domain and its solution are achieved in the building and application of the designed artifact. Three recent exemplars in the research literature are used to demonstrate the application of these guidelines. We conclude with an analysis of the challenges of performing high-quality design-science research in the context of the broader IS community.

[1]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[2]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[3]  T. Kuhn.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition , 1970 .

[4]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  Elements of Programming Style , 1974 .

[5]  Peter P. Chen.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[6]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[7]  David Chaum,et al.  Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms , 1981, CACM.

[8]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[9]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[10]  Edward A. Feigenbaum,et al.  The fifth generation - artificial intelligence and Japan's computer challenge to the world , 1991 .

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[12]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[13]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key issues in information systems management , 1987 .

[14]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering , 1987 .

[15]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[16]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Comparison of User Performance between the Relational and the Extended Entity Relationship Models in the Discovery phase of Database Design , 1988, ICIS.

[17]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[18]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[19]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[20]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer , 1989 .

[21]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering design. , 1990, Science.

[22]  Kar Yan Tam.  Automated Construction of Knowledge-Bases from Examples , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Comparing representations with relational and EER models , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[24]  P. Drucker.  The new productivity challenge. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[25]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Integrating expert systems with group decision support systems , 1991, TOIS.

[27]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[28]  M. Aboulafia.  Philosophy, social theory, and the thought of George Herbert Mead , 1992 .

[29]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[32]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Exploring Modes of Facilitative Support for GDSS Technology , 1993, MIS Q..

[33]  Kishore Sengupta,et al.  Cognitive Feedback in GDSS: Improving Control and Convergence , 1993, MIS Q..

[34]  David A. Bell,et al.  From Data Properties to Evidence , 1993, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[35]  Randall Davis,et al.  Heuristics for Reconciling Independent Knowledge Bases , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[37]  Robert W. Blanning,et al.  Metagraphs: a tool for modeling decision support systems , 1994 .

[38]  Bernard P. Zajac.  Applied cryptography: Protocols, algorithms, and source code in C , 1994 .

[39]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Comparing data modeling formalisms , 1995, CACM.

[40]  Bruce Schneier,et al.  Applied cryptography (2nd ed.): protocols, algorithms, and source code in C , 1995 .

[41]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Information Technology Interaction Model: A Foundation for the MBA Core Course , 1995, MIS Q..

[42]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[44]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[45]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  The role of experimentation in software engineering: past, current, and future , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[46]  Henry Petroski,et al.  Invention by design: how engineers get from thought to thing , 1996 .

[47]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The computer scientist as toolsmith II , 1996, CACM.

[49]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[50]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[51]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Bringing Design to Software , 1996 .

[52]  Ron Weber,et al.  Ontological foundations of information systems , 1997 .

[53]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Beyond calculation - the next fifty years of computing , 1997 .

[54]  Terry Winograd,et al.  The Design Interaction , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[55]  D. Tsichritzis.  The dynamics of innovation , 1997 .

[56]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A new social contract for research , 1997, CACM.

[57]  Akmal B. Chaudhri,et al.  Object Databases in Practice , 1997 .

[58]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Peter B. Seddon.  A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Database design with common sense business reasoning and learning , 1997, TODS.

[61]  Wil M.P. van der Aalst,et al.  WOFLAN : a Petri-net-based workflow analyzer , 1999 .

[62]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Semantic Structuring in Analyst Acquisition and Representation of Facts in Requirements Analysis , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction , 1998 .

[64]  George B. Kleindorfer,et al.  Validation in Simulation: Various Positions in the Philosophy of Science , 1998 .

[65]  Marvin V. Zelkowitz,et al.  Experimental Models for Validating Technology , 1998, Computer.

[66]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  On Formal Semantics and Analysis of Typed Modeling Languages: An Analysis of Ascend , 1998, INFORMS J. Comput..

[67]  Walter F. Tichy,et al.  Should Computer Scientists Experiment More? , 1998, Computer.

[68]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Strong vs. weak approaches to systems development , 1998, CACM.

[69]  Sumit Sarkar,et al.  A Probabilistic Decision Model for Entity Matching in Heterogeneous Databases , 1998 .

[70]  Walker Royce,et al.  Software Project Management: A Unified Framework , 1998 .

[71]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A framework for identifying software project risks , 1998, CACM.

[72]  David Hillel Gelernter.  Machine Beauty: Elegance And The Heart Of Technology , 1998 .

[73]  John H. Gerdes,et al.  Anonymous mechanisms in group decision support systems communication , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[74]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Improving database design through the analysis of relationships , 1999, TODS.

[75]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[76]  Robert L. Glass.  The Loyal Opposition - On Design , 1999, IEEE Software.

[77]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[78]  Lynda M. Applegate,et al.  Rigor and Relevance in MIS Research-Introduction , 1999 .

[79]  Iris Vessey,et al.  An empirical investigation of entity-based and object-oriented data modeling: a development life cycle approach , 1999, ICIS.

[80]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  What Is the Rational Unified Process ? , 2001 .

[81]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[82]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[83]  Ravi Kalakota,et al.  e-Business 2.0: Roadmap for Success , 2000 .

[84]  Yair Wand,et al.  Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling , 2000, TODS.

[85]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Second Edition , 2000 .

[86]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[87]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[88]  Robert W. Blanning,et al.  A Formal Approach to Workflow Analysis , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[89]  Jesper M. Johansson.  On the impact of network latency on distributed systems design , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[90]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  On design , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[91]  Dragos Manolescu,et al.  Production workflow: concepts and techniques , 2001, SOEN.

[92]  Ron Weber,et al.  Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[93]  Terry Halpin,et al.  Information modeling and relational databases: from conceptual analysis to logical design , 2001 .

[94]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[95]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[96]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Coming of the New Organization , 2001 .

[97]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[98]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Investigating the Moderators of the Group Support Systems Use with Meta-Analysis , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[99]  Levent V. Orman,et al.  Electronic Markets, Hierarchies, Hubs, and Intermediaries , 2002, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[100]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  Workflow support for electronic commerce applications , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[101]  Kees M. van Hee,et al.  Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems , 2002, Cooperative information systems.

[102]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  An ontological analysis of the economic primitives of the extended-REA enterprise information architecture , 2002, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[103]  Peter P. Chen.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[104]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Improving Analysis Pattern Reuse in Conceptual Design: Augmenting Automated Processes with Supervised Learning , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[105]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[106]  Jesper M. Johansson,et al.  Modeling Network Latency and Parallel Processing in Distributed Database Design , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[107]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  XML - Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[108]  Steven L. Alter.  18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace "The IT Artifact" as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[109]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[110]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Information Systems Research , 2004, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

[111]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Editor’s comments , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[112]  Philippe B Kruchten.  The Rational Unified Process - An Introduction, 3rd Edition , 2004, Addison Wesley object technology series.