Seedling diversity in Hydatellaceae: implications for the evolution of angiosperm cotyledons.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cotyledon number has long been a primary morphological feature distinguishing monocots from other angiosperms. Recent placement of Hydatellaceae near the early-divergent angiosperm order Nymphaeales, rather than in the monocot order Poales, has prompted reassessment of seedling morphology in this poorly known family. METHODS Seedlings of six species representing all eco-geographical groups of Hydatellaceae are described using light and scanning electron microscopy. KEY RESULTS Two seedling types were discovered. Material examined of Trithuria submersa, T. bibracteata, T. austinensis and T. filamentosa possess a transparent bilobed sheathing structure that surrounds the main axis below the first foliage leaf. The seed coat is attached to the sheathing structure. Seedlings of Trithuria lanterna and T. konkanensis lack a sheathing structure, and the seed coat is attached to a short, narrow lateral outgrowth on the main axis of the seedling. CONCLUSIONS The sheathing structure that is present in seedlings of some Hydatellaceae could be homologized with the two united cotyledons of water lilies. It also resembles the single cotyledon of some monocots, and hence demonstrates a possible pathway of the origin of a monocot-like embryo, though no homology is implied. The sheathing structure is reduced in Trithuria lanterna and T. konkanensis, and the short, narrow outgrowth of its seedling could represent a single cotyledon. This synapomorphy suggests that the only Indian species of Hydatellaceae, T. konkanensis, is closer to the northern Australian T. lanterna than to the south-western Australian T. bibracteata.

[1]  W. Burger.  The question of cotyledon homology in angiosperms , 1998, The Botanical Review.

[2]  A. Henderson.  Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution. 2 vols. Edited by Paula Rudall, Phillip Cribb, David Cutler & Christopher Humphries. , 1996, Brittonia.

[3]  D. Sokoloff,et al.  Classification of the early-divergent angiosperm family Hydatellaceae : one genus instead of two, four new species and sexual dimorphism in dioecious taxa , 2008 .

[4]  K. Kondo,et al.  Anatomical studies on seeds and seedlings of some Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae) , 2008, Brittonia.

[5]  H. Tillich.  Seedling diversity and the homologies of seedling organs in the order poales (monocotyledons). , 2007, Annals of botany.

[6]  Jerrold I. Davis,et al.  Morphology of Hydatellaceae, an anomalous aquatic family recently recognized as an early-divergent angiosperm lineage. , 2007, American journal of botany.

[7]  B. G. Briggs,et al.  Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree , 2007, Nature.

[8]  D. Sokoloff,et al.  Morphology and nrITS phylogeny of the genus Pinguicula L. (Lentibulariaceae), with special attention to embryo evolution. , 2006, Plant biology.

[9]  B. Haccius,et al.  Embryologische und histogenetische Studien an „monokotylen Dikotylen“ II.Pinguicula vulgaris L. undPinguicula alpinah L. , 1957, Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift.

[10]  B. Haccius.  Verbreitung und Ausbildung der Einkeimblättrigkeit bei den Umbelliferen , 1952, Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift.

[11]  H. Tillich.  Seedling diversity in Araceae and its systematic implications , 2003 .

[12]  P. Rudall,et al.  Evolutionary history of the monocot leaf , 2002 .

[13]  R. Rutishauser,et al.  Developmental Genetics and Morphological Evolution of Flowering Plants, Especially Bladderworts (Utricularia): Fuzzy Arberian Morphology Complements Classical Morphology , 2001 .

[14]  G. Titova.  On the nature of pseudomonocotyly in flowering plants. , 2000 .

[15]  H.-J. Tillich.  Die Keimpflanzen der Nymphaeaceae – monocotyl oder dicotyl? , 1990 .

[16]  D. Cooke.  Two Western Australian Hydatellaceae , 1983, Muelleria: An Australian Journal of Botany.

[17]  D. Cooke.  New species of Schoenus (Cyperaceae) and Trithuria (Hydatellaceae) , 1981, Muelleria: An Australian Journal of Botany.

[18]  R. Haines,et al.  Monocotylar seedlings: a review of evidence supporting an origin by fusion , 1979 .

[19]  R. Haines,et al.  Seedlings of Nymphaeaceae , 1975 .