Non-Contacting Techniques for Plant Drought Stress Detection

Plant drought stress indicators such as crop water stress index (CWSI), plant motion in the form of covariance of top-projected canopy area (COVTPCA), leaf water content represented as equivalent water thickness (EWT), and their threshold values for drought stress detection were established from measurements. Performances of these indicators in detecting drought stress of New Guinea Impatiens plants in a controlled environment were evaluated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the timing of drought stress detection by these indicators against the timing of incipient drought stress defined by evapotranspiration (ET) and timing of human visual detection. Statistical analysis was also performed to study the consistency of the threshold values of the indicators in different experiments. ANOVA results showed that the CWSI was the most reliable indicator for early plant drought stress detection. The timing of the drought stress detection from the earliest to the latest was CWSI, EWT, and COVTPCA. While COVTPCA and EWT were not able to detect drought stress as early as CWSI, ANOVA results indicated that these two indicators were able to detect drought stress no later than visual detection. ANOVA results also showed that there was no significant difference in threshold values of CWSI and COVTPCA in different experiments, but different cultivars used in the experiments resulted in significant differences in EWT threshold values.

[1]  S. Idso,et al.  Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator , 1981 .

[2]  M. Kacira,et al.  Machine vision extracted plant movement for early detection of plant water stress. , 2002, Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

[3]  Elias Fereres,et al.  Irrigation Water Management of Horticultural Crops , 2003 .

[4]  Rainer Matyssek,et al.  Distinct roles of electric and hydraulic signals on the reaction of leaf gas exchange upon re-irrigation in Zea mays L. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[5]  S. Tarantola,et al.  Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain , 2001 .

[6]  J. Boyer Plant Productivity and Environment , 1982, Science.

[7]  L. Testi,et al.  Crop water stress index is a sensitive water stress indicator in pistachio trees , 2008, Irrigation Science.

[8]  C. Osmond,et al.  Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New series. Volume 12B. Physiological plant ecology II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. , 2011 .

[9]  Shana Poplack,et al.  The inherent variability of the French Subjunctive , 1991 .

[10]  J. P. Grime Physiological Plant Ecology III: Responses to the Chemical and Biological Environment.O. L. Lange , P. S. Nobel , C. B. Osmond , H. Ziegler , 1984 .

[11]  D. D. Fangmeier,et al.  Quantifying wheat water stress with the crop water stress index to schedule irrigations , 1994 .

[12]  Ray Jackson,et al.  Detection and Evaluation of Plant Stresses for Crop Management Decisions , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  P. Kramer Plant and Soil Water Relationships , 1969 .

[14]  P P Ling,et al.  Design and development of an automated and non-contact sensing system for continuous monitoring of plant health and growth. , 2001, Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

[15]  Peter P. Ling,et al.  Improved model inversion procedure for plant water status assessment under artificial lighting using PROSPECT+SAIL , 2004 .

[16]  M. Kacira,et al.  Establishing crop water stress index (CWSI) threshold values for early, non-contact detection of plant water stress , 2000 .

[17]  Marina Bährle-Rapp,et al.  Moisture Content , 2007 .

[18]  S. Idso,et al.  Wheat Canopy Temperature: Relation to Plant Water Potential1 , 1978 .

[19]  Amos Naor,et al.  The inherent variability of water stress indicators in apple, nectarine and pear orchards, and the validity of a leaf-selection procedure for water potential measurements , 2005, Irrigation Science.

[20]  S. Lalonde,et al.  INJURIES TO REPRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT UNDER WATER STRESS, AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR CROP PRODUCTIVITY , 1997 .

[21]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants , 1965, Science.

[22]  G. Qiu,et al.  Application of a new method to evaluate crop water stress index , 2005, Irrigation Science.

[23]  Fusuo Zhang,et al.  The Relations of Stomatal Conductance, Water Consumption, Growth Rate to Leaf Water Potential During Soil Drying and Rewatering Cycle of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) , 2002 .

[24]  A. Naor,et al.  Irrigation Scheduling and Evaluation of Tree Water Status in Deciduous Orchards , 2010 .

[25]  S. Husman,et al.  Production, Growth, and Nut Quality in Pecans under Water Stress Based on the Crop Water Stress Index , 1993 .

[26]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[27]  S. Jacquemoud Inversion of the PROSPECT + SAIL Canopy Reflectance Model from AVIRIS Equivalent Spectra: Theoretical Study , 1993 .

[28]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Spectral reflectance of dehydrating leaves: Measurements and modelling , 1997 .

[29]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[30]  Ray D. Jackson,et al.  Diurnal Changes in Plant Water Potential and Canopy Temperature of Wheat as Affected by Drought1 , 1978 .

[31]  Moisture Content of Cotton Leaves and Petioles as Related to Environmental Moisture Stress 1 , 1969 .

[32]  S. Idso,et al.  Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability☆ , 1981 .