The Spiral Curriculum: implications for online learning

BackgroundThere is an apparent disjuncture between the requirements of the medical spiral curriculum and the practice of replacing previous online material in undergraduate courses. This paper investigates the extent to which students revisit previous online material for the purposes of building the educational spiral, and the implications for the implementation of a Faculty's Learning Management System implementation.MethodsAt the University of Cape Town, medical students' last date of access to 16 previous online courses was determined. Students completed a survey to determine their reasons for revisiting this material and the perceived benefits of this availability.Results70% of the students revisited their previous online courses. The major reasons were to review lecture presentations, lectures notes, and quizzes. The perceived benefits were for understanding new material, preparation for assessments, and convenience.Although student comments were not always in line with the concept of the spiral curriculum, most referred to processes of building on previous work, and some mentioned the spiral curriculum specifically.ConclusionThis study suggests that the practice of replacing previous online courses may hinder rather than support student learning. Although students visit previous material for ranges of reasons, a large number are aware of the spiral curriculum, and use the online environment to build upon previous material. Any practice, which entails replacing material and redesigning curricula content may be detrimental to the students' future learning needs, and such activities may need revision.

[1]  Not just another multi-professional course! Part 1. Rationale for a transformative curriculum , 2006, Medical teacher.

[2]  D. Brigden,et al.  Continuing professional development : open forum , 2005 .

[3]  AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 4-Outcome-based learning and the electronic curriculum at Birmingham Medical School , 1999 .

[4]  Ken Masters The day after tomorrow: Continuing student use of old online courses , 2006 .

[5]  J. Cross Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace , 2004 .

[6]  K. Masters,et al.  Integrating IT into a South African health sciences curriculum , 2003, International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education, 2003. Proceedings. ITRE2003..

[7]  A. S. Malik,et al.  The undergraduate curriculum of Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak in terms of Harden's 10 questions , 2002, Medical teacher.

[8]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1999 .

[9]  R. Akehurst,et al.  The implications of contact with the mentor for preregistration nursing and midwifery students. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  T. Konrad,et al.  Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. , 2001, Health services research.

[11]  John Couperthwaite,et al.  Building learning communities: foundations for good practice , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  J. Aultman The Hidden Curriculum , 2007 .

[13]  Seonaidh McDonald,et al.  Curriculum or syllabus: which are we reforming? , 2001, Medical teacher.

[14]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  M. Davis OSCE: the Dundee experience , 2003, Medical teacher.

[16]  Michelle McLean,et al.  WebCT: integrating computer-mediated communication and resource delivery into a new problem-based curriculum , 2002, The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine.

[17]  J J Kabara,et al.  Spiral curriculum. , 1972, Journal of medical education.

[18]  P. Campion,et al.  New perspectives—approaches to medical education at four new UK medical schools , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  N. Swerdlow,et al.  Attitudes toward psychiatry as a prospective career among students entering medical school. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[20]  S Lowry,et al.  Curriculum design. , 1992, BMJ.

[21]  Roger Jones,et al.  Changing face of medical curricula , 2001, The Lancet.

[22]  Michelle M. Kazmer Beyond C U L8R: disengaging from online social worlds , 2007, New Media Soc..

[23]  D. Anderson,et al.  The hidden curriculum. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Minna Lakkala,et al.  Teachers' attitudes to and beliefs about web-based Collaborative Learning Environments in the context of an international implementation , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[25]  A. M. White The Process of Education , 1994 .

[26]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Online Learning: From Information Dissemination to Fostering Collaboration , 2001 .

[27]  R Kneebone,et al.  Surgical skills training: simulation and multimedia combined , 2001, Medical education.

[28]  David Dewhurst,et al.  Managing and supporting medical education with a virtual learning environment: the Edinburgh Electronic Medical Curriculum , 2003, Medical teacher.

[29]  Gudrun Oberprieler,et al.  Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[30]  K. Masters,et al.  Information technology and information literacy for first year health sciences students in South Africa: matching early and professional needs , 2005, Medical teacher.

[31]  Ronald M Harden,et al.  Planning and implementing an undergraduate medical curriculum: the lessons learned , 2003, Medical teacher.

[32]  Michelle M. Kazmer How technology affects students' departures from online learning communities , 2005, SIGG.