Efficiency comparison of subcritical OTEC power cycle using various working fluids

Abstract This paper presents an investigation into the thermal efficiency and main component size of the subcritical ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) power cycle using various working fluids under different operation conditions. The analysis procedure was performed with a simulation program written in Engineering Equation Solver. With the given analysis conditions, efficiencies of three types of working fluids were evaluated and compared. It was found that the thermal efficiencies of the subcritical OTEC power cycle depend strongly on the evaporating and condensing temperature, and turbine efficiency, while not roughly depending on superheating degrees and pump efficiencies. With a thorough grasp of these results, an efficient OTEC power cycle can be designed. R717 and R404A yielded the highest and lowest thermal efficiencies among the wet fluids, and R22 showed the largest efficiency among the dry fluids. For the iso-entropic fluids, R245fa provided the highest thermal efficiency. In comparison of main component sizes, R404A and R744 had the largest and smallest condenser size, respectively. Also, R744 exhibited the smallest evaporator size, and R404A and R227ea show the largest size. And R744 and R245fa gave the largest and smallest pump size, respectively. From the results of thermal efficiency and main components for various working fluids in the OTEC power cycle, R717 in the subcritical OTEC power cycle is the preferred working fluid, except for its toxicity and flammability.

[1]  K. Ng,et al.  Using the condenser effluent from a nuclear power plant for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) , 2009 .

[2]  H. C. Stevens,et al.  Integration and Optimization of the Gas Removal System for Hybrid-Cycle OTEC Power Plants , 1990 .

[3]  Tzu-Chen Hung,et al.  A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using low-grade energy sources , 2010 .

[4]  Jung-In Yoon,et al.  Performance Characteristics of R744 OTEC Power Cycle with Operation Parameters , 2012 .

[5]  Haruo Uehara,et al.  Performance Analysis of an OTEC Plant and a Desalination Plant Using an Integrated Hybrid Cycle , 1996 .

[6]  Haruo Uehara,et al.  Conceptual design of ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) power plants in the Philippines , 1988 .

[7]  R. Yeh,et al.  Maximum output of an OTEC power plant , 2005 .

[8]  E. Stefanakos,et al.  A REVIEW OF THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES AND WORKING FLUIDS FOR THE CONVERSION OF LOW-GRADE HEAT , 2010 .

[9]  Dariusz Mikielewicz,et al.  A thermodynamic criterion for selection of working fluid for subcritical and supercritical domestic micro CHP , 2010 .

[10]  V. Maizza,et al.  WORKING FLUIDS IN NON-STEADY FLOWS FOR WASTE ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEMS , 1996 .

[11]  Yasuyuki Ikegami,et al.  Optimization design and exergy analysis of organic rankine cycle in ocean thermal energy conversion , 2012 .

[12]  V. L. Bruch.  An assessment of research and development leadership in ocean energy technologies , 1994 .

[13]  Jinn-Chuang Yang,et al.  Optimal Design of a Pilot OTEC Power Plant in Taiwan , 1991 .

[14]  Guo Tao,et al.  Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation , 2011 .