Comparison of Clinical Interpretation With Visual Assessment and Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Contemporary Practice: The Assessing Angiography (A2) Project
暂无分享,去创建一个
Harlan M Krumholz | Joann G Elmore | John A Spertus | Brahmajee K Nallamothu | Joseph P Drozda | Alexandra J Lansky | David J Cohen | John S Rumsfeld | M. Walsh | J. Elmore | W. Weaver | H. Krumholz | J. Spertus | J. Rumsfeld | A. Lansky | J. Reiber | B. Nallamothu | D. Cohen | G. Dehmer | J. Drozda | J. Brush | Philip G Jones | Philip G. Jones | Mary Norine Walsh | W Douglas Weaver | Johan H C Reiber | Gregory J Dehmer | John E Brush | Faraz Kureshi | Faraz Kureshi | Gerald C Koenig | Thad F Waites | D Scott Gantt | George Kichura | Richard A Chazal | Peter K O'Brien | C Michael Valentine | Richard A Krumholz | C. Valentine | T. Waites | D. Gantt | Gerald Koenig | G. Kichura | R. A. Chazal | R. Krumholz | R. Chazal
[1] R. Popp,et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of visual coronary stenosis estimates using information from multiple observers , 1992, Clinical cardiology.
[2] J. J. Gerbrands,et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.
[3] Sharmila Devi. US physicians urge end to unnecessary stent operations , 2011, The Lancet.
[4] A. Lansky,et al. Quantitative angiographic methods for bifurcation lesions : A consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[5] M. Murphy,et al. Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability. , 1978, JAMA.
[6] A. Wear. CIRCULATION , 1964, The Lancet.
[7] K. Gould,et al. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] S. M. Collins,et al. Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard". , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] T. Cupples. Single Reading with Computer-Aided Detection for Screening Mammography , 2009 .
[10] C. D'Orsi,et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[11] M. Raphael,et al. A "SIGNIFICANT" STENOSIS: THIRTY YEARS ON , 1989, The Lancet.
[12] P J Scanlon,et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and , 1999, Circulation.
[13] Laura Mauri,et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[14] Laura Mauri,et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Circulation.
[15] T. Takaro,et al. Observer Agreement in Evaluating Coronary Angiograms , 1975, Circulation.
[16] N. Kleiman,et al. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.
[17] W. Laskey,et al. 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus documents developed in co , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] H. Krumholz,et al. Putting ad hoc PCI on pause. , 2010, JAMA.
[19] J. Murray,et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[20] Jacob Cohen,et al. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .
[21] P. Hartigan,et al. Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. , 1994, Circulation.
[22] R. Vogel,et al. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[23] D. Faxon,et al. Value of visual versus central quantitative measurements of angiographic success after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. NHLBI PTCA Registry Investigators. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.
[24] J. J. Gerbrands,et al. Coronary Artery Dimensions from Cineangiograms-Methodology and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Analysis Procedure , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[25] J. Messenger,et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[26] S. Astley,et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[27] L D Fisher,et al. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). , 1982, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[28] J. Spertus,et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Am , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[29] R H Brook,et al. Effect of variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coronary revascularization procedures. , 2000, American heart journal.
[30] J. Murray,et al. Variability in the Analysis of Coronary Arteriograms , 1977, Circulation.
[31] W. Desmet,et al. Discrepancy between visual estimation and computer-assisted measurement of lesion severity before and after coronary angioplasty. , 1994, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[32] Peter Niederer,et al. Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1991, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.
[33] A. Viera,et al. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.
[34] J. H. C. Reiber,et al. State of the Art in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1986, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.