Wholeߚstream metabolism in two montane streams: Contribution of the hyporheic zone

We used whole-stream and benthic chamber methods to measure rates of metabolism and determine the contribution of the hyporheic zone to ecosystem respiration (R) in two streams with differing surface‐subsurface exchange characteristics, Rio Calaveras and Gallina Creek, New Mexico. We used the difference between whole-stream and benthic R to calculate the rate of hyporheic zone R and coupled this estimate to an independent measure of hyporheic sediment R to estimate the cross-sectional area of the hyporheic zone ( AH) for two reaches from each stream. Conservative tracer injections and solute transport modeling were used to characterize surface‐subsurface hydrologic exchange by determining values of the cross-sectional area of the transient storage zone ( As). The hyporheic zone contributed a substantial proportion of whole-stream R in all four study reaches, ranging from 40 to 93%. Wholestream R, hyporheic R, and percent contribution of hyporheic R all increased as transient storage increased, with whole-stream and hyporheic R exhibiting significant relationships with As. All three measures of respiration and values of AH were much greater for both reaches of the stream with greater surface‐subsurface exchange. AH is valuable for cross-site comparisons because it accounts for differences in rates of both benthic and hyporheic sediment R and can be used to predict the importance of the hyporheic zone to other stream ecosystem processes.

[1]  J. Bahr,et al.  Direct comparison of kinetic and local equilibrium formulations for solute transport affected by surface reactions , 1987 .

[2]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Contribution of the Hyporheic Zone to Ecosystem Metabolism in a Prealpine Gravel-Bed-River , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  Jeremy B. Jones,et al.  Denitrification in a nitrogen-limited stream ecosystem , 1996 .

[4]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Experimental design for estimating parameters of rate‐limited mass transfer: Analysis of stream tracer studies , 1997 .

[5]  M. E. Campana,et al.  ALLUVIAL CHARACTERISTICS, GROUNDWATER–SURFACE WATER EXCHANGE AND HYDROLOGICAL RETENTION IN HEADWATER STREAMS , 1997 .

[6]  W. Hill,et al.  5 – Effects of Light , 1996 .

[7]  M. E. Campana,et al.  Parent lithology, surface-groundwater exchange, and nitrate retention in headwater streams , 1996 .

[8]  Emily H. Stanley,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HYPORHEIC ZONE IN STREAMS AND RIVERS , 1998 .

[9]  C. Dahm,et al.  ORGANIC CARBON SUPPLY AND METABOLISM IN A SHALLOW GROUNDWATER ECOSYSTEM , 2000 .

[10]  Roy A. Walters,et al.  Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool‐and‐riffle stream: A transient storage model , 1983 .

[11]  S. Hendricks,et al.  Physicochemical Patterns within a Hyporheic Zone of a Northern Michigan River, with Comments on Surface Water patterns' , 1991 .

[12]  P. Mulholland,et al.  Evidence that hyporheic zones increase heterotrophic metabolism and phosphorus uptake in forest streams , 1997 .

[13]  Alan D. Steinman,et al.  Improvements to the diurnal upstream-downstream dissolved oxygen change technique for determining whole-stream metabolism in small streams , 1998 .

[14]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  1 – Quantifying Hydrologic Interactions between Streams and Their Subsurface Hyporheic Zones , 2000 .

[15]  Patrick J. Mulholland,et al.  Streams and Ground Waters , 1999 .

[16]  T. C. Winter,et al.  Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource , 1999 .

[17]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists , 1997 .

[18]  S. Findlay.  Importance of surface‐subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: The hyporheic zone , 1995 .

[19]  J. Newbold,et al.  Physical factors influencing fine organic particle transport and deposition in streams , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[20]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Evaluating the Reliability of the Stream Tracer Approach to Characterize Stream‐Subsurface Water Exchange , 1996 .

[21]  S. Gregory,et al.  Analysis of the process of retention of organic matter in stream ecosystems , 1984 .

[22]  L. A. Smock,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation of microbial respiration rates in a blackwater stream , 1996 .

[23]  A. Huryn,et al.  Comment: Improvements to the diurnal upstream-downstream dissolved oxygen change technique for determining whole-stream metabolism in small streams , 1998 .

[24]  H. Odum.  Primary Production in Flowing Waters1 , 1956 .

[25]  M. Brunke,et al.  The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater , 1997 .

[26]  Jeremy B. Jones,et al.  Surface-subsurface interactions in stream ecosystems. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Jeremy B. Jones,et al.  Nitrification in the Hyporheic Zone of a Desert Stream Ecosystem , 1995, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[28]  Nicholas G. Aumen,et al.  Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems , 1990 .

[29]  D. J. D'Angelo,et al.  Transient Storage in Appalachian and Cascade Mountain Streams as Related to Hydraulic Characteristics , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[30]  M. Pusch,et al.  Community respiration in hyporheic sediments of a mountain stream (Steina, Black Forest) , 1994 .

[31]  N. Grimm,et al.  Nutrient dynamics at the interface between surface waters and groundwaters , 1998 .

[32]  F. Triska,et al.  Denitrification in sediments from the hyporheic zone adjacent to a small forested stream , 1990 .

[33]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  One-Dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage (OTIS): A Solute Transport Model for Streams and Rivers , 1998 .