Outcome in patients presenting with an aneurysm related intracerebral haemorrhage in the post-ISAT era

Abstract Background. The outcome in patients who present with an aneurysm related intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is poor. There are many treatment strategies now available to treat this group of patients. The management approach is dominated by a direct surgical approach for both aneurysm treatment and clot evacuation. It remains unclear, however, whether overall outcomes justify an aggressive treatment approach in this group of patients. We report our results of a pragmatic strategy based on availability of expertise and patient condition in patients presenting with an aneurysm related intracerebral haemorrhage. Methods. We retrospectively identified and analysed prospectively collected data of SAH patients with concurrent ICH. The grade at presentation, treatment decision, complications, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, and 6 month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at 6 months) were recorded. Findings. Between August 2008 and January 2010, 40 patients (9.2%) with ICH were identified from the 433 patients with SAH. Twenty five patients (63%) were transferred across to the neurosurgical centre for further investigations and management. Most patients presented with poor WFNS grade (61%) and had right sided middle cerebral artery aneurysms (58%) with frontotemporal (42%) or temporoparietal (42%) haematomas. Management included craniotomy/craniectomy and clipping of the aneurysm in 18 patients (72%), coiling followed by surgical clot evacuation in five (20%), and craniectomy and coiling (4%) or coiling alone (4%). The outcome in treated patients was favourable (GOS 4 or 5) in 46% of patients with a 35% overall mortality. Conclusion. The presence of an aneurysm related ICH does not justify a nihilistic approach, as aggressive treatment is associated with a favourable outcome in 46% of patients. In the post-ISAT era, management should be patient specific and consideration should be given to both endovascular and open surgical therapy.

[1]  K. Lakshminarayan,et al.  Impact of International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States: Clinical article , 2009 .

[2]  V. Seifert,et al.  SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE AND INTRACEREBRAL HEMATOMA: INCIDENCE, PROGNOSTIC FACTORS, AND OUTCOME , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[3]  R. Heros.  Vascular neurosurgery since the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  C. Tolias,et al.  Vascular neurosurgery following the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial: modern practice reflected by subspecialization. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  Kanna K. Gnanalingham,et al.  The impact of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) on the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in a neurosurgical unit in the UK , 2006, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[6]  P. Sandercock,et al.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion , 2005, The Lancet.

[7]  A. Molyneux,et al.  Treatment of intracerebral hematomas caused by aneurysm rupture: coil placement followed by clot evacuation. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  T Brott,et al.  The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. , 1996, Stroke.

[9]  H. Yoshioka,et al.  Intracerebral hematoma in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. , 1995, Surgical neurology.

[10]  J. Rosenørn,et al.  The prognostic significance of intracerebral haematoma as shown on CT scanning after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. , 1994, British journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  R. Scienza,et al.  Intracranial hematomas following aneurysmal rupture: experience with 309 cases. , 1986, Surgical neurology.