Estimates of infectious disease risk factors in US blood donors. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

OBJECTIVE Individuals who do not respond accurately to questions about infectious disease risk factors at the time of blood donation represent a potential threat to the safety of the blood supply. This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of undetected behavioral and other risks in current blood donors. DESIGN Anonymous mail surveys to collect demographic, medical, and behavioral information were administered to individuals who had donated blood within the previous 2 months. Sampling weights were used in the analysis to adjust for differential sampling and response rates among demographic groups to provide prevalence estimates for the donor population. SETTING Five geographically and demographically diverse US blood centers. PARTICIPANTS A stratified probability sample of 50,162 allogeneic blood donors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Estimated prevalence rates for risk behaviors that would have been a basis for deferral if reported at the time of the donor screening interview (deferrable risk). RESULTS Completed questionnaires were received for 34,726 donors (69.2% of the sample). A total of 186 per 10,000 respondents (1.9%) reported a deferrable risk that was present at the time of their past donation, while 39 per 10,000 (0.4%) reported this behavior within the 3 months prior to donation. Rates (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of deferrable risk behaviors were 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.6) times higher for men than women, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.3-2.0) times higher for first-time vs repeat donors, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3.6) times higher for donors with reactive screening tests, and 7.6 (95% CI, 3.6-15.8) times higher for donors who used the confidential unit exclusion option. CONCLUSIONS Despite the high degree of transfusion safety in the United States today, a measurable percentage of active blood donors when assessed by anonymous survey report risks for human immunodeficiency virus and other infections not reported at the time of screening, suggesting the need for further refinements in the blood donor qualification process.

[1]  S. Kleinman,et al.  The Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral Infections , 1996 .

[2]  P. Rosenberg.  Scope of the AIDS Epidemic in the United States , 1995, Science.

[3]  H. Haverkos,et al.  The social organization of sexuality. , 1995, JAMA.

[4]  R. Dodd,et al.  The effectiveness of the confidential unit exclusion option , 1994, Transfusion.

[5]  A. Williams,et al.  Demographic characteristics and prevalence of serologic markers among donors who use the confidential unit exclusion process: the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study , 1994, Transfusion.

[6]  G. Satten,et al.  Direct oral questions to blood donors: the impact on screening for human immunodeficiency virus , 1994, Transfusion.

[7]  T. Ezzati-Rice,et al.  Risk behavior and correlates of risk for HIV infection in the Dallas County Household HIV survey. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[8]  B. Leigh,et al.  The sexual behavior of US adults: results from a national survey. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[9]  H Turner,et al.  Prevalence of AIDS-related risk factors and condom use in the United States. , 1992, Science.

[10]  J. Ward,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 ‐infected blood donors:behavioral characteristics and reasons for donation , 1991, Transfusion.

[11]  L. Petersen,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1‐infected blood donors: behavioral characteristics and reasons for donation. , 1991, Transfusion.

[12]  E L Korn,et al.  Epidemiologic studies utilizing surveys: accounting for the sampling design. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[13]  A. M. Rose,et al.  Screening potential blood donors at risk for human immunodeficiency virus , 1991, Transfusion.

[14]  E. H. Kaplan,et al.  Self-Deferral, HIV Infection, and the Blood Supply , 1990 .

[15]  Lincoln E. Moses,et al.  AIDS: The Second Decade , 1990 .

[16]  G. R. Carter,et al.  Efficacy of various methods of confidential unit exclusion in identifying potentially infectious blood donations , 1989, Transfusion.

[17]  H. Klein,et al.  Clinical implications of positive tests for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in asymptomatic blood donors. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  G. Leparc,et al.  Impact of explicit questions about high‐risk activities on donor attitudes and donor deferral patterns. Results in two community blood centers , 1989, Transfusion.

[19]  H. Jaffe,et al.  Acquired immune deficiency syndrome in the United States: the first 1,000 cases. , 1983, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  Rupert G. Miller.  The jackknife-a review , 1974 .