Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition

This study was designed to examine age effects on various auditory perceptual skills using a large group of listeners (155 adults, 121 aged 60–88 years and 34 aged 18–30 years), while controlling for the factors of hearing loss and working memory (WM). All subjects completed 3 measures of WM, 7 psychoacoustic tasks (24 conditions) and a hearing assessment. Psychophysical measures were selected to tap phenomena thought to be mediated by higher-level auditory function and included modulation detection, modulation detection interference, informational masking (IM), masking level difference (MLD), anisochrony detection, harmonic mistuning, and stream segregation. Principal-components analysis (PCA) was applied to each psychoacoustic test. For 6 of the 7 tasks, a single component represented performance across the multiple stimulus conditions well, whereas the modulation-detection interference (MDI) task required two components to do so. The effect of age was analyzed using a general linear model applied to each psychoacoustic component. Once hearing loss and WM were accounted for as covariates in the analyses, estimated marginal mean thresholds were lower for older adults on tasks based on temporal processing. When evaluated separately, hearing loss led to poorer performance on roughly 1/2 the tasks and declines in WM accounted for poorer performance on 6 of the 8 psychoacoustic components. These results make clear the need to interpret age-group differences in performance on psychoacoustic tasks in light of cognitive declines commonly associated with aging, and point to hearing loss and cognitive declines as negatively influencing auditory perceptual skills.

[1]  R. Gorsuch Exploratory Factor Analysis , 1988 .

[2]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Age-Related Deficits in Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures of Binaural Temporal Processing , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[3]  Maureen J. Shader,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Speech Understanding: Peripheral Versus Cognitive Influences , 2020 .

[4]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Effects of Age, Cognition, and Neural Encoding on the Perception of Temporal Speech Cues , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  Edward L. Bartlett,et al.  Age-related Changes in Neural Coding of Envelope Cues: Peripheral Declines and Central Compensation , 2019, Neuroscience.

[6]  Samira Anderson,et al.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Erol J. Ozmeral,et al.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space , 2018, Hearing Research.

[8]  Jaime A. Undurraga,et al.  Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence of Reduced Binaural Temporal Processing in the Aging and Hearing Impaired Human Auditory System , 2018, Trends in hearing.

[9]  L. Fostick,et al.  Dyslexia as a multi-deficit disorder: Working memory and auditory temporal processing. , 2018, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age , 2017, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[11]  Sunghee H Tak,et al.  Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Characterized by Deficient Brainstem and Cortical Representations of Speech , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss enhances auditory sensitivity and temporal integration for amplitude modulation. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Stephan D Ewert,et al.  Interactions between amplitude modulation and frequency modulation processing: Effects of age and hearing loss. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A. Wingfield,et al.  The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Comparing the effects of age on amplitude modulation and frequency modulation detection. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  On Older Listeners' Ability to Perceive Dynamic Pitch. , 2016, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  V. Cardin Effects of Aging and Adult-Onset Hearing Loss on Cortical Auditory Regions , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[19]  J. Grose,et al.  Masking Period Patterns and Forward Masking for Speech-Shaped Noise: Age-Related Effects , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[20]  Scott Tonidandel,et al.  RWA Web: A Free, Comprehensive, Web-Based, and User-Friendly Tool for Relative Weight Analyses , 2014, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[21]  B. Moore,et al.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[22]  M. Akeroyd An Overview of the Major Phenomena of the Localization of Sound Sources by Normal-Hearing, Hearing-Impaired, and Aided Listeners , 2014, Trends in hearing.

[23]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[24]  L. Humes,et al.  Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[25]  Kelly L Tremblay,et al.  Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[26]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults: questions and answers , 2014, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.

[27]  A. Wimo,et al.  A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed (AQT): Usefulness in dementia evaluations in primary care , 2013, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[28]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Temporal Discrimination , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  A working memory test battery for MATLAB , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[32]  Larry E. Humes,et al.  Factors Affecting Speech Understanding in Older Adults , 2010 .

[33]  Karen J. Cruickshanks,et al.  Epidemiology of Age-Related Hearing Impairment , 2010 .

[34]  Stefan J. Troche,et al.  The influence of temporal resolution power and working memory capacity on psychometric intelligence , 2009 .

[35]  T. Salthouse When does age-related cognitive decline begin? , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[36]  Louis D Braida,et al.  Review Article: Review of the Literature on Temporal Resolution in Listeners With Cochlear Hearing Impairment: A Critical Assessment of the Role of Suprathreshold Deficits , 2009, Trends in amplification.

[37]  G. Poling Informational masking in older adults , 2009 .

[38]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  J. Ahlstrom,et al.  Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  M. Akeroyd Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[41]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual's elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[42]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Aging and Speech-on-Speech Masking , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[43]  Brian Gygi,et al.  Individual differences in auditory abilities. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  F. Jäkel,et al.  Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[45]  E. Healy,et al.  An across-frequency processing deficit in listeners with hearing impairment is supported by acoustic correlation. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[46]  Liang Li,et al.  Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Merav Ahissar,et al.  Poor Frequency Discrimination Probes Dyslexics with Particularly Impaired Working Memory , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[48]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research , 2004 .

[49]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  S. Bacon,et al.  Across-frequency comparison of temporal speech information by listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[51]  J. Opie,et al.  Modulation detection interference in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[52]  Jennifer J. Lister,et al.  Modulation of Presbycusis: Current Status and Future Directions , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[53]  C Alain,et al.  Age-related changes in detecting a mistuned harmonic. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[55]  J R Dubno,et al.  Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  D. Grantham,et al.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  K. Snell,et al.  Age-related changes in temporal gap detection. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  J. Willott,et al.  Anatomic and physiologic aging: a behavioral neuroscience perspective. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[59]  C Alain,et al.  Aging and the segregation of auditory stimulus sequences. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[60]  H S Colburn,et al.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  J. Hall,et al.  Modulation Detection Interference (MDI) in listeners with cochlear hearing loss. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[62]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[63]  John H. Grose,et al.  Masking Level Differences for Tones and Speech in Elderly Listeners With Relatively Normal Audiograms , 1994 .

[64]  M R Leek,et al.  Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[66]  R. Peters,et al.  Masking level differences for tones and speech in elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[67]  B C Moore,et al.  Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  B A Schneider,et al.  Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay dichotic conditions. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[69]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[70]  S McAdams,et al.  Hearing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex tone. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  W A Yost,et al.  Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  B. Moore,et al.  Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  H S Colburn,et al.  Binaural interaction of impaired listeners. A review of past research. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[74]  S Buus,et al.  Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[75]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[76]  Leon van Noorden,et al.  Minimum differences of level and frequency for perceptual fission of tone sequences ABAB , 1977 .

[77]  John Fletcher,et al.  Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .

[78]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[79]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[80]  John Schmid,et al.  The development of hierarchical factor solutions , 1957 .

[81]  A. Anastasi Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[82]  I. Hirsh The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .