Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity.

[1]  Doerte U. Junghaenel,et al.  Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative , 2014, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items , 2009, Quality of Life Research.

[4]  David Cella,et al.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[5]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet , 2009 .

[6]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  Sen-Chi Yu,et al.  Comparison of Internet-Based and Paper-Based Questionnaires in Taiwan Using Multisample Invariance Approach , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[9]  David J Weiss,et al.  Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) , 2007, Medical care.

[10]  J. Fries,et al.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years , 2007, Medical care.

[11]  J. Greist,et al.  Assessing the onset of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction using interactive voice response technology. , 2007, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[12]  Jeanne M. Landgraf,et al.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of adolescent health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire Child Form (CHQ-CF): internet administration compared with the standard paper version , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[13]  M. Fava,et al.  An Evaluation of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: A Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression Trial Report , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[14]  E. Boyko,et al.  Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. , 2004, Family medicine.

[15]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Comparison of interactive voice response and written self-administered patient surveys for clinical research. , 2001, Orthopedics.

[16]  D. Osoba,et al.  Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. , 1998, Quality of Life Research.

[17]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .