Trajectory Tracking Analysis of Planar End-Effector Upper Limb Rehabilitation Device

Rehabilitation devices have become one of the more sought-after focus areas among researchers in the robotics field, where it could be used to assist patients in the process of stroke recovery. Therefore, the motivation of this thesis is to further investigate the planar end-effector upper limb rehabilitation device as a viable solution for patients with movement disorders, instead of the more expensive alternative of exoskeleton robots. This paper illustrates the mathematical modelling and simulation of a planar end-effector rehabilitation device for the upper limb. The rehabilitation device is of two degrees of freedom, and is used in this research due to its cost effectiveness and practicality. The derivation of the forward and inverse kinematics of the robotic system is established by using the Denavit-Hartenberg algorithm, which is proceeded to be used in the trajectory tracking of the end-effector of the device, as well as the programming of the feedback control system to control the actuators used in the system. The results of the simulation suggest that the mathematical modelling of the system is able to predict the behaviour of the system, which is to be implemented in this robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.

[1]  S. Leonhardt,et al.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Sheng Quan Xie,et al.  Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  J. Furusho,et al.  Quasi-3-DOF Rehabilitation System for Upper Limbs: Its Force-Feedback Mechanism and Software for Rehabilitation , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[4]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A Simple Robotic System for Neurorehabilitation , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Design of a planar robotic machine for neuro-rehabilitation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Yassine Bouteraa,et al.  Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation , 2016, 2016 13th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD).

[7]  Michelle J. Johnson,et al.  Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  Agnes Roby-Brami,et al.  Upper-Limb Robotic Exoskeletons for Neurorehabilitation: A Review on Control Strategies , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  Giulio Rosati,et al.  Planar Robotic Systems for Upper-Limb Post-Stroke Rehabilitation , 2008 .

[11]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  MIT-MANUS: a workstation for manual therapy and training II , 1993, Other Conferences.

[12]  R. Calabró,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis , 2017, Neurological Sciences.

[13]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  MIT-MANUS: a workstation for manual therapy and training. I , 1992, [1992] Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.

[14]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.