First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning

Technology‐assisted learning systems are being developed at ever increasing rates, and the labels applied to such systems are growing with them. For example, not only do we have e‐learning, but we also have hybrid learning, online learning, and mobile learning (m‐learning), to mention only a few. Considering that technology is being incorporated in virtually all courses, this article uses the single term e3‐learning, as introduced by Spector and Merrill in this special issue to refer to these systems collectively with the emphasis on effectiveness, efficiency, and engagement. Learning concerns learner motivation. Five first principles of motivation and volition that characterize learning systems that effectively motivate students are introduced in this article.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  J. Keller.  The Arcs Model of Motivational Design , 2010 .

[3]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Evaluation of an Embodied Conversational Agent with Affective Behavior , 2003 .

[4]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[5]  B. Skinner,et al.  Technology of Teaching , 1967, Nature.

[6]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Designing Environments for Constructive Learning , 2012, NATO ASI Series.

[7]  John M. Keller,et al.  Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students' motivation, study habits and achievement , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Hermann Astleitner,et al.  A Model for Motivationally Adaptive Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1995 .

[9]  Randall H. Rezabek.  Utilizing Intrinsic Motivation in the Design of Instruction. , 1994 .

[10]  T. Kopp,et al.  Designing Boredom Out of Instruction. , 1982 .

[11]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[12]  David C. McClelland,et al.  Motives, Personality, and Society : Selected Papers , 1984 .

[13]  B. Weiner.  Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory , 1974 .

[14]  John M. Keller,et al.  Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective , 1979 .

[15]  John M. Keller,et al.  The clinical use of motivational messages: an inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design , 1990 .

[16]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[17]  John M. Keller,et al.  Motivation in Cyber Learning Environments , 1995 .

[18]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Intelligent Agents as Cognitive Tools for Education. , 1999 .

[19]  Seung-Yoon Oh,et al.  Effects of Reusable Motivational Objects in Designing Reusable Learning Object‐Based Instruction , 2006 .

[20]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[21]  Donald J. Winiecki,et al.  Evaluation of Effective Interventions to Solve the Drop out Problem in Adult Distance Education , 1999 .

[22]  R. W. White.  Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[23]  John M. Keller,et al.  The systematic process of motivational design , 1987 .

[24]  Harold D. Stolovitch,et al.  Handbook of human performance technology: Improving individual and organizational performance worldwide (second edition) , 1999 .

[25]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[26]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional Design Theories and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status , 1983 .

[27]  Ruth V. Small,et al.  The Relationship of Motivational Conditions to Effective Instructional Attributes: A Magnitude Scaling Approach. , 1994 .

[28]  Ning Wang,et al.  Experimental evaluation of polite interaction tactics for pedagogical agents , 2005, IUI.

[29]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[30]  Simon So,et al.  A Study on the Acceptance of Mobile Phones for Teaching and Learning with a Group of Pre-service Teachers in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[31]  M. Maehr.  Continuing Motivation: An Analysis of a Seldom Considered Educational Outcome , 1976 .

[32]  Benedict du Boulay,et al.  Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems , 1995 .

[33]  John M. Keller,et al.  How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach , 2000 .

[34]  J. Keller.  Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design , 1987 .

[35]  J. Lichtenberg.  On motivational systems. , 1990, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[36]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. Purpose , 1997 .

[37]  M. Zuckerman.  Dimensions of Sensation Seeking. , 1971 .

[38]  R. Woods.  How Much Communication Is Enough in Online Courses? Exploring the Relationship between Frequency of Instructor-Initiated Personal Email and Learner's Perceptions of and Participation in Online Learning , 2002 .

[39]  J. Keller.  An Integrative Theory of Motivation, Volition, and Performance , 2008 .

[40]  J. Keller.  Motivational Design of Instruction , 1983 .

[41]  John Condry.  Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. , 1977 .

[42]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  Action Control: The Maintenance of Motivational States , 1987 .

[43]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. , 1962 .

[44]  B. Zimmerman.  Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective , 1998 .

[45]  John M. Keller,et al.  Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation , 2001 .