Review of Research Trends and Methods in Nano Environmental, Health, and Safety Risk Analysis

Despite the many touted benefits of nanomaterials, concerns remain about their possible environmental, health, and safety (EHS) risks in terms of their toxicity, long-term accumulation effects, or dose-response relationships. The published studies on EHS risks of nanomaterials have increased significantly over the past decade and half, with most focused on nanotoxicology. Researchers are still learning about health consequences of nanomaterials and how to make environmentally responsible decisions regarding their production. This article characterizes the scientific literature on nano-EHS risk analysis to map the state-of-the-art developments in this field and chart guidance for the future directions. First, an analysis of keyword co-occurrence networks is investigated for nano-EHS literature published in the past decade to identify the intellectual turning points and research trends in nanorisk analysis studies. The exposure groups targeted in emerging nano-EHS studies are also assessed. System engineering methods for risk, safety, uncertainty, and system reliability analysis are reviewed, followed by detailed descriptions where applications of these methods are utilized to analyze nanomaterial EHS risks. Finally, the trends, methods, future directions, and opportunities of system engineering methods in nano-EHS research are discussed. The analysis of nano-EHS literature presented in this article provides important insights on risk assessment and risk management tools associated with nanotechnology, nanomanufacturing, and nano-enabled products.

[1]  Yu Zhang,et al.  The effect of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles on Escherichia coli genome. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[2]  R. Tennant,et al.  Identifying chemical carcinogens and assessing potential risk in short-term bioassays using transgenic mouse models. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Achieving accuracy, generalization-to-contexts, and complexity in theories of business-to-business decision processes , 2013 .

[4]  Chung-Min Liao,et al.  Assessing the potential exposure risk and control for airborne titanium dioxide and carbon black nanoparticles in the workplace , 2011, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[5]  J. Kong,et al.  Characterization and evaluation of nanoparticle release during the synthesis of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  R P Rechard,et al.  Historical Relationship Between Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal and Other Types of Risk Assessment , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  P. Swuste,et al.  Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  James E. Smith,et al.  Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis , 1995 .

[10]  M. Roberts,et al.  Grey Goo on the Skin? Nanotechnology, Cosmetic and Sunscreen Safety , 2007, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[11]  Gary J. Powers,et al.  Fault tree synthesis for chemical processes , 1974 .

[12]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  C. Haynes,et al.  Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the use of risk and decision analysis to support decision-making , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[16]  Andrew D Maynard,et al.  Exposure Assessment Approaches for Engineered Nanomaterials , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Abdallah S. Daar,et al.  State of Academic Knowledge on Toxicity and Biological Fate of Quantum Dots , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[18]  C. H. Lie,et al.  Fault Tree Analysis, Methods, and Applications ߝ A Review , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[19]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis , 2004 .

[20]  Fabrizio Lillo,et al.  The impact of systemic and illiquidity risk on financing with risky collateral , 2015 .

[21]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: Methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Paul Schulte,et al.  Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[23]  Tian Xia,et al.  Hierarchical Rank Aggregation with Applications to Nanotoxicology , 2013, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics.

[24]  Wout Slob,et al.  Exploring the Uncertainties in Cancer Risk Assessment Using the Integrated Probabilistic Risk Assessment (IPRA) Approach , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  E. Cummins,et al.  A Risk Assessment Framework for Assessing Metallic Nanomaterials of Environmental Concern: Aquatic Exposure and Behavior , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  B. Nowack,et al.  Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Ronald Pelot,et al.  A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Model and Risk Assessment Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Q. Chaudhry,et al.  Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[29]  Vladimir Murashov,et al.  Essential features for proactive risk management. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[30]  Anders Baun,et al.  Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[31]  Kyunghee Choi,et al.  Characterization of exposure to silver nanoparticles in a manufacturing facility , 2009 .

[32]  Leonard Sweet,et al.  Nanotechnology—Life-Cycle Risk Management , 2006 .

[33]  Dicksen Tanzil,et al.  Relative risk analysis of several manufactured nanomaterials: an insurance industry context. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[35]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  The use of Bayesian networks for nanoparticle risk forecasting: model formulation and baseline evaluation. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[37]  M. Eisner Governing the Environment: The Transformation of Environmental Regulation , 2006 .

[38]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Modeling nanomaterial fate in wastewater treatment: Monte Carlo simulation of silver nanoparticles (nano-Ag). , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  O. Renn,et al.  Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance , 2006, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[40]  C. B. Chapman,et al.  Large engineering project risk analysis , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[42]  Mitchell J Small,et al.  Methods for Assessing Uncertainty in Fundamental Assumptions and Associated Models for Cancer Risk Assessment , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanostructured particles in an industrial pilot plant. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[44]  Yong Qian,et al.  System-based identification of toxicity pathways associated with multi-walled carbon nanotube-induced pathological responses. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[45]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials , 2007 .

[46]  Jamie R Lead,et al.  Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[47]  Jennifer Kuzma,et al.  Upstream Oversight Assessment for Agrifood Nanotechnology: A Case Studies Approach , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  S. Iavicoli,et al.  Potential occupational exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in Italy , 2008 .

[49]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  Health risk assessment for nanoparticles: A case for using expert judgment , 2006 .

[50]  Indy Hurt,et al.  Nanotoxicology: characterizing the scientific literature, 2000–2007 , 2008, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[51]  Ndeke Musee,et al.  Simulated environmental risk estimation of engineered nanomaterials: A case of cosmetics in Johannesburg City , 2011, Human & experimental toxicology.

[52]  M. Roberts,et al.  Human Skin Penetration of Sunscreen Nanoparticles: In-vitro Assessment of a Novel Micronized Zinc Oxide Formulation , 2007, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[53]  Andrew D. Maynard,et al.  A decade of uncertainty. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[54]  Nate Seltenrich,et al.  Nanosilver: Weighing the Risks and Benefits , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[55]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[56]  M. S. Elliott,et al.  Computer-assisted fault-tree construction using a knowledge-based approach , 1994 .

[57]  Thierry Meyer,et al.  Management of nanomaterials safety in research environment , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[58]  Michael V. Frank,et al.  Choosing among safety improvement strategies: a discussion with example of risk assessment and multi-criteria decision approaches for NASA , 1995 .

[59]  E. V. Sargent,et al.  Establishing airborne exposure control limits in the pharmaceutical industry. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[60]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[61]  P. Westerhoff,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[62]  John M. Charnes,et al.  Real-Options Valuation for a Biotechnology Company , 2000 .

[63]  Christine Ogilvie Robichaud,et al.  Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[65]  Luke J Mortensen,et al.  In vivo skin penetration of quantum dot nanoparticles in the murine model: the effect of UVR. , 2008, Nano letters.

[66]  Ben Gouldby,et al.  Adaptive Flood Risk Management Under Climate Change Uncertainty Using Real Options and Optimization , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[67]  Wolfgang Kreyling,et al.  Occupational and consumer risk estimates for nanoparticles emitted by laser printers , 2010 .

[68]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: Comparing two approaches in the context of power systems , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[69]  R. Falkner,et al.  Regulating Nanotechnologies: Risk, Uncertainty and the Global Governance Gap , 2012, Global Environmental Politics.

[70]  M. Kraft THE USE OF RISK ANALYSIS IN FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES: AN EXPLORATION1 , 1982 .

[71]  P. T. Kalaichelvan,et al.  Ecotoxicity of Nanoparticles , 2013, ISRN toxicology.

[72]  Arnim von Gleich,et al.  A suggested three-tiered approach to assessing the implications of nanotechnology and influencing its development , 2008 .

[73]  R W Scholz,et al.  Engineered nanomaterials in rivers--exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[74]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Integrating legal liabilities in nanomanufacturing risk management. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[75]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Remote Sensing Data Reveals Eco-Environmental Changes in Urban Areas of Klang Valley, Malaysia: Contribution from Object Based Analysis , 2013, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

[76]  D Geraci,et al.  Risk assessment model of occupational exposure to nanomaterials , 2009, Human & experimental toxicology.

[77]  G. C. Oliveira,et al.  Combining analytical models and Monte-Carlo techniques in probabilistic power system analysis , 1992 .

[78]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Expert judgment based multi-criteria decision model to address uncertainties in risk assessment of nanotechnology-enabled food products , 2011 .

[79]  Lei Huang,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Soil Pollution: A Case Study in the Qixia Mining Area, China , 2012 .

[80]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Identification of Risks in the Life Cycle of Nanotechnology‐Based Products , 2008 .

[81]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Application of stochastic multiattribute analysis to assessment of single walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[82]  M. J. Quadrel,et al.  Risk perception and communication , 2008 .

[83]  Mohammad Modarres,et al.  A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[84]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[85]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  A risk forecasting process for nanostructured materials, and nanomanufacturing , 2011 .

[86]  Peter Wick,et al.  Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. , 2007, Ciencia & saude coletiva.

[87]  Reynold Sequeira,et al.  Risk analysis and protection measures in a carbon nanofiber manufacturing enterprise: an exploratory investigation. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[88]  J J Pet-Armacost,et al.  Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis of Unknown Parameters in Hazardous Materials Transportation Risk Assessment , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[89]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Global Risk Governance , 2008 .

[90]  E. Kuempel Carbon Nanotube Risk Assessment: Implications for Exposure and Medical Monitoring , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[91]  S. Weissenberger,et al.  A Systematic Approach to Nuclear Safeguards Decision-Making , 1982 .

[92]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Potential exposure of German consumers to engineered nanoparticles in cosmetics and personal care products , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[93]  Szu-Chieh Chen,et al.  Lung cancer risk in relation to traffic-related nano/ultrafine particle-bound PAHs exposure: a preliminary probabilistic assessment. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[94]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[95]  George E Apostolakis,et al.  How Useful Is Quantitative Risk Assessment? , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[96]  T. Seager,et al.  Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[97]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[98]  Saji George,et al.  TOXICITY PROFILING OF ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS VIA MULTIVARIATE DOSE-RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING. , 2012, The annals of applied statistics.

[99]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Particle Flow Analysis , 2012 .

[100]  Abe Zeid,et al.  The structure and analysis of nanotechnology co-author and citation networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[101]  Olli Varis,et al.  Bayesian decision analysis for environmental and resource management , 1997 .

[102]  Mitsutoshi Takaya,et al.  Distinguishing nanomaterial particles from background airborne particulate matter for quantitative exposure assessment , 2009 .

[103]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk Analysis of Dust Explosion Scenarios Using Bayesian Networks , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[104]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  Studying the potential release of carbon nanotubes throughout the application life cycle , 2008 .

[105]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria decision aid in financial management , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[106]  Naomi Lubick,et al.  Risks of nanotechnology remain uncertain. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[107]  P. Boyle Options: A Monte Carlo approach , 1977 .

[108]  Mehmet Sahinoglu,et al.  Security meter: a practical decision-tree model to quantify risk , 2005, IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine.

[109]  D E Burmaster,et al.  Principles of good practice for the use of Monte Carlo techniques in human health and ecological risk assessments. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[110]  James C. Benneyan,et al.  Risk Analysis Modeling of Production Costs and Occupational Health Exposure of Single‐Wall Carbon Nanotube Manufacturing , 2008 .

[111]  P. Linares,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making and risk analysis as risk management tools for power systems planning , 2002 .

[112]  I. Linkov,et al.  Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials , 2009 .

[113]  Katrin Ostertag,et al.  Identification of starting points for exposure assessment in the post-use phase of nanomaterial-containing products , 2008 .

[114]  Kara Morgan,et al.  Development of a Preliminary Framework for Informing the Risk Analysis and Risk Management of Nanoparticles , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[115]  João C. N. Clímaco,et al.  A multiple objective linear programming model for power generation expansion planning , 1995 .

[116]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[117]  David Vernez,et al.  Development of a control banding tool for nanomaterials , 2012 .

[118]  P. Swuste,et al.  Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures , 2009 .

[119]  G. Daston,et al.  Toxicology of nanoparticles. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[120]  J. Kerry,et al.  Migration and exposure assessment of silver from a PVC nanocomposite. , 2013, Food chemistry.

[121]  R. M. Russell,et al.  An introduction to a UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals , 1998 .

[122]  F. Gottschalk,et al.  Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: A risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.