The Bland-Altman analysis: Does it have a role in assessing radiation dosimeter performance relative to an established standard?

Abstract Bland–Altman analysis is used to compare two different methods of measurement and to determine whether a new method of measurement may replace an existing accepted ‘gold standard’ method. In this work, Bland–Altman analysis has been applied to radiation dosimetry to compare the PTW Markus and Roos parallel plate ionisation chambers and a PTW PinPoint chamber against a Farmer type ionisation chamber which is accepted as the gold standard for radiation dosimetry in the clinic. Depth doses for low energy x-rays beams with energies of 50, 75 and 100 kVp were measured using each of the ionisation chambers. Depth doses were also calculated by interpolation of the data in the British Journal of Radiology (BJR) Report 25. From the Bland–Altman analysis, the mean dose difference between the two parallel plate chambers and the Farmer chambers was 1% over the range of depths measured. The PinPoint chamber gave significant dose differences compared to the Farmer chamber. There were also differences of up to 12% between the BJR Report 25 depth doses and the measured data. For the Bland–Altman plots, the lines representing the limits of agreement were selected to be a particular percentage agreement e.g. 1 or 2%, instead of being based on the standard deviation ( σ ) of the differences. The Bland–Altman statistical analysis is a powerful tool for making comparisons of ionisation chambers with an ionisation chamber that has been accepted as a ‘gold standard’. Therefore we conclude that Bland–Altman analysis does have a role in assessing radiation dosimeter performance relative to an established standard.

[1]  T. Knöös,et al.  Kilovoltage x-ray dosimetry—an experimental comparison between different dosimetry protocols , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  P. Carrasco,et al.  Pantak Therapax SXT 150: performance assessment and dose determination using IAEA TRS-398 protocol. , 2005, British Journal of Radiology.

[3]  C. Baldock,et al.  An evaluation of ionization chambers for the relative dosimetry of kilovoltage x-ray beams. , 2009, Medical physics.

[4]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Data required for testicular dose calculation during radiotherapy of seminoma. , 2006, Medical physics.

[5]  A. Nahum,et al.  The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL; 10-300 kV generating potential). Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A. W. Seaby,et al.  Performance characteristics of the Pantak DXT-300 kilovoltage X-ray treatment machine. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Frush,et al.  Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[11]  C. Ma,et al.  Study of dosimetry consistency for kilovoltage x-ray beams. , 1998, Medical physics.

[12]  K. Nithya,et al.  Evaluation of dosimetric functions for Ir-192 source using radiochromic film , 2009 .

[13]  W. V. Prestwich,et al.  Calculated dose response of Gafchromic MD55 film for 103Pd and 125I relative to 60Co , 2000 .

[14]  C. Baldock,et al.  Evaluation of the water equivalence of solid phantoms using gamma ray transmission measurements , 2008 .

[15]  A H Beddoe,et al.  Application of diamond detectors to the dosimetry of 45 and 100 kvp therapy beams: comparison with a parallel-plate ionization chamber and Monte Carlo. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  L. Holloway,et al.  An investigation of dose changes for therapeutic kilovoltage X-ray beams with underlying lead shielding. , 2007, Medical physics.

[17]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[18]  G. Allan Johnson,et al.  Application of MOSFET Detectors for Dosimetry in Small Animal Radiography Using Short Exposure Times , 2008, Radiation research.

[19]  R M Harrison,et al.  Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al–4 mm Cu HVL) , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Lois C Holloway,et al.  Use of thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) for quality assurance of orthovoltage X-ray therapy machines , 2008 .

[21]  B. Healy,et al.  Output factor measurements for a kilovoltage x-ray therapy unit , 2005, Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[22]  M. Mcewen,et al.  An experimental and computational investigation of the standard temperature-pressure correction factor for ion chambers in kilovoltage x rays. , 2007, Medical physics.

[23]  C. Ma,et al.  Measurement of percentage depth dose and lateral beam profile for kilovoltage x-ray therapy beams. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Comparative study of polyacrylamid gels and thermoluminescent dosimeters used in external radiotherapy , 2005 .

[25]  S M Seltzer,et al.  AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. , 2001, Medical physics.

[26]  L. Holloway,et al.  A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage x-ray beams , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  J. Mills,et al.  An assessment of GafChromic film for measuring 50 kV and 100 kV percentage depth dose curves , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  P. Evans,et al.  Performance assessment of the Gulmay D3300 kilovoltage X-ray therapy unit. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Energy dependence (75 kVp to 18 MV) of radiochromic films assessed using a real-time optical dosimeter. , 2007, Medical physics.

[30]  M. Butson,et al.  Low-dose measurement with a MOSFET in high-energy radiotherapy applications , 2005 .