Artificial Moral Agency in Technoethics

This chapter will argue that artificial agents created or synthesized by technologies such as artificial life (ALife), artificial intelligence (AI), and in robotics present unique challenges to the traditional notion of moral agency and that any successful technoethics must seriously consider that these artificial agents may indeed be artificial moral agents (AMA), worthy of moral concern. This purpose will be realized by briefly describing a taxonomy of the artificial agents that these technologies are capable of producing. I will then describe how these artificial entities conflict with our standard notions of moral agency. I argue that traditional notions of moral agency are too strict even in the case of recognizably human agents and then expand the notion of moral agency such that it can sensibly include artificial agents. INTRODUCTION

[1]  Yingxu Wang,et al.  The Formal Design Model of a Real-Time Operating System (RTOS+): Static and Dynamic Behaviors , 2010, Int. J. Softw. Sci. Comput. Intell..

[2]  K. Himma.  Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: what properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent? , 2009, Ethics and Information Technology.

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[4]  Colin Allen,et al.  Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[5]  John P. Sullins.  When Is a Robot a Moral Agent , 2006 .

[6]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Is it an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents , 1996, ATAL.

[7]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the Morality of Artificial Agents , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[8]  Bernhard Irrgang.  Ethical acts in robotics , 2006, UBIQ.

[9]  F. Waal,et al.  Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals , 1996 .

[10]  John P. Sullins.  Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology , 2008 .

[11]  Benjamin Libet,et al.  The Volitional Brain: Towards a Neuroscience of Free Will , 1999 .

[12]  J. McDermott.  The Culture of Experience: Philosophical Essays in the American Grain , 1987 .

[13]  John P. Sullins.  Ethics and Artificial life: From Modeling to Moral Agents , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[14]  Selmer Bringsjord,et al.  Ethical robots: the future can heed us , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[15]  E. Sober,et al.  Summary of: ‘Unto Others. The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior' , 1998 .

[16]  Eric Dietrich.  Homo sapiens 2.0: why we should build the better robots of our nature , 2001 .

[17]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[18]  L. Floridi.  © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Information ethics: On the philosophical foundation of computer ethics ⋆ , 2022 .

[19]  Yingxu Wang.  On Cognitive Models of Causal Inferences and Causation Networks , 2011, Int. J. Softw. Sci. Comput. Intell..

[20]  Peter Danielson.  Artificial Morality: Virtuous Robots for Virtual Games , 1992 .

[21]  Hans P. Moravec.  Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind , 1998 .

[22]  M. Bunge.  Towards a Technoethics , 1975 .

[23]  N. Packard,et al.  Transitions from Nonliving to Living Matter , 2004, Science.

[24]  F. D. Waal,et al.  Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved , 2006 .

[25]  L. Floridi,et al.  Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[26]  Mark Weiser,et al.  The spirit of the engineering quest , 1999 .

[27]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  What is the Philosophy of Information , 2002 .

[28]  P. Singer.  In defense of animals : the second wave , 2006 .

[29]  Alfredo Milani,et al.  Adaptive Indexing for Semantic Music Information Retrieval , 2011 .