Do brachiopods show substrate‐related phenotypic variation? A case study from the Burgess Shale

As sessile, benthic filter feeders, brachiopods share an intimate relationship with their chosen substrate. Individuals of Micromitra burgessensis in the Burgess Shale Formation are preserved in life position, attached to a range of hard substrates, including skeletal debris, conspecific brachiopods, sponges and enigmatic tubes. Here we investigate the phenotypic variability of M. burgessensis associated with differing substrate attachments. We apply geometric morphometrics to test for variation by plotting landmarks on the exterior of ventral and dorsal valves of M. burgessensis specimens that are preserved attached to different substrates. Using principal component, canonical variate analyses and anova, we determine that there is some variation in shape related to substrate. Canonical variate analyses, for ventral valves and dorsal valves, indicate that specimens attached to the same substrate are recognizable in shape from specimens attached to other substrate types. The strength of differentiation however, is not robust and combined with our discriminate analysis of separate populations suggests that there is the potential for substrates to exercise only weak control over the morphology of Brachiopoda.

[1]  L. Holmer,et al.  Survival on a soft seafloor: life strategies of brachiopods from the Cambrian Burgess Shale , 2015 .

[2]  L. Holmer,et al.  Competition and mimicry: the curious case of chaetae in brachiopods from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale , 2015, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[3]  S. Bengtson,et al.  Chancelloriids of the Cambrian Burgess Shale , 2015 .

[4]  L. Holmer,et al.  Brachiopods hitching a ride: an early case of commensalism in the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[5]  L. Angiolini,et al.  Hydrodynamic advantages in the free‐living spiriferinide brachiopod Pachycyrtella omanensis: functional insight into adaptation to high‐energy flow environments , 2014 .

[6]  D. Harper,et al.  Morphofunctional analysis of Svobodaina species (Brachiopoda, Heterorthidae) from south‐western Europe , 2014 .

[7]  Jennifer E. Bauer,et al.  The Orientation of Strophomenid Brachiopods on Soft Substrates , 2013, Journal of Paleontology.

[8]  K. De Baets,et al.  Intraspecific variability through ontogeny in early ammonoids , 2013, Paleobiology.

[9]  M. Harzhauser,et al.  Phenotypic evolution in a fossil gastropod species lineage: Evidence for adaptive radiation? , 2012 .

[10]  Rituparna Bose A new morphometric model in distinguishing two closely related extinct brachiopod species , 2012 .

[11]  D. Lluch-Cota,et al.  Shell Shape Differences between Two Panopea Species and Phenotypic Variation Among P. Globosa at Different Sites using two Geometric Morphometrics Approaches , 2012 .

[12]  L. Holmer,et al.  Peduncular attached secondary tiering acrotretoid brachiopods from the Chengjiang fauna: Implications for the ecological expansion of brachiopods during the Cambrian explosion , 2012 .

[13]  C. Klingenberg,et al.  Developmental plasticity, morphological variation and evolvability: a multilevel analysis of morphometric integration in the shape of compound leaves , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[14]  Andrea Cardini,et al.  Leaf Morphology, Taxonomy and Geometric Morphometrics: A Simplified Protocol for Beginners , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  C. Klingenberg MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[16]  C. Schlichting,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity's impacts on diversification and speciation. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  O. Kuwazuru,et al.  Functional adaptation of spiriferide brachiopod morphology , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[18]  M. Labarbera,et al.  ONTOGENETIC NICHE SHIFT IN THE BRACHIOPOD TEREBRATALIA TRANSVERSA: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE LOSS OF ROTATION ABILITY AND ALLOMETRIC GROWTH , 2008 .

[19]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  Paleoecology of the Greater Phyllopod Bed community, Burgess Shale , 2008 .

[20]  D. García‐Bellido,et al.  REASSESSMENT OF THE GENUS LEANCHOILIA (ARTHROPODA, ARACHNOMORPHA) FROM THE MIDDLE CAMBRIAN BURGESS SHALE, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA , 2007 .

[21]  M. Gaspar,et al.  Use of shape to distinguish Chamelea gallina and Chamelea striatula (Bivalvia: Veneridae): Linear and geometric morphometric methods , 2006, Journal of morphology.

[22]  J. Fordyce The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  R. Bromley,et al.  Attachment strategies of organisms on hard substrates: A palaeontological view , 2006 .

[24]  Martin Solan,et al.  Extinction and Ecosystem Function in the Marine Benthos , 2004, Science.

[25]  R. Krause An Assessment of Morphological Fidelity in the Sub-fossil Record of a Terebratulide Brachiopod , 2004 .

[26]  Mark A. Wilson,et al.  Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities , 2003 .

[27]  A. Meyer,et al.  SHAPE ANALYSIS OF SYMMETRIC STRUCTURES: QUANTIFYING VARIATION AMONG INDIVIDUALS AND ASYMMETRY , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  J. M. Lynch,et al.  Use of Geometric Morphometrics to Differentiate Gila (Cyprinidae) within the Upper Colorado River Basin , 2001, Copeia.

[29]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Patterns of Shape Change in the Ordovician Brachiopod Sowerbyella , 2001 .

[30]  L. R. Leighton Environmental Distribution of Spinose Brachiopods from the Devonian of New York: Test of the Soft-substrate Hypothesis , 2000 .

[31]  M. Webster,et al.  Compaction-related deformation in Cambrian olenelloid trilobites and its implications for fossil morphometry , 1999, Journal of Paleontology.

[32]  D. Roff Phenotypic Evolution — A Reaction Norm Perspective , 1999, Heredity.

[33]  D. Collins,et al.  The Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale and its relationship to the Stephen Formation in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains , 1998 .

[34]  R. Reyment,et al.  Taxonomic recognition of species ofNeogastroplites(Ammonoidea, Cenomanian) by geometric morphometric methods , 1998 .

[35]  Jonathan D. Marcot,et al.  Phenetic discrimination of biometric simpletons: paleobiological implications of morphospecies in the lingulide brachiopod Glottidia , 1997, Paleobiology.

[36]  Alwyn Williams,et al.  A Supra-Ordinal Classification of the Brachiopoda , 1996 .

[37]  J. Hohenegger,et al.  Morphometric methods in determination of ammonite species, exemplified through Balatonites shells (Middle Triassic) , 1992, Journal of Paleontology.

[38]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[39]  S. Morris,et al.  New Burgess Shale Fossil Sites Reveal Middle Cambrian Faunal Complex , 1983, Science.

[40]  W. Atchley,et al.  THE GEOMETRY OF CANONICAL VARIATE ANALYSIS , 1981 .

[41]  I. R. Stewart Population structure of articulate brachiopod species from soft and hard substrates , 1981 .

[42]  A. E. Aldridge Intraspecific variation of shape and size in subtidal populations of two Recent New Zealand articulate brachiopods , 1981 .

[43]  R. Alexander Growth, morphology and ecology of Paleozoic and Mesozoic opportunistic species of brachiopods from Idaho-Utah , 1977 .

[44]  C. W. Thayer,et al.  Burrowing of the lingulid brachiopod Glottidia pyramidata: its ecologic and paleoecologic significance , 1975 .

[45]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Ammonoid Intraspecific Variability , 2015 .

[46]  Erik,et al.  Exceptionally preserved brachiopods from the Chengjiang Lagerst(a|¨)tte(Yunnan,China):Perspectives on the Cambrian explosion of metazoans , 2013 .

[47]  M. Zelditch,et al.  Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists , 2012 .

[48]  D. Harper,et al.  The Oldest Brachiopods from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia , 2011 .

[49]  Julien Claude,et al.  Morphometrics with R , 2009 .

[50]  M. Zelditch Developmental Regulation of Variability , 2005 .

[51]  D. Collins,et al.  Sponges of the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale and Stephen Formations, British Columbia , 2004 .

[52]  L. Peck,et al.  Biology of living brachiopods , 1992 .

[53]  M. Collins,et al.  Growth rate and substrate‐related mortality of a benthic brachiopod population , 1991 .

[54]  R. Alexander Comparative hydrodynamic stability of brachiopod shells on current‐scoured arenaceous substrates , 1984 .

[55]  G. Curry Ecology and population structure of the recent brachiopod terebratulina from Scotland , 1982 .

[56]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[57]  C. E. Resser Fifth contribution to nomenclature of Cambrian fossils , 1942 .

[58]  Charles D. Walcott,et al.  Middle Cambrian spongiae , 1917 .