A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare.

The key aspects of landfill operation that remain unresolved are the extended timescale and uncertain funding of the post-closure period. This paper reviews the topic and proposes an economic instrument to resolve the unsustainable nature of the current situation. Unsustainability arises from the sluggish degradation of organic material and also the slow flushing of potential pollutants that is exacerbated by low-permeability capping. A landfill tax or aftercare provision rebate is proposed as an economic instrument to encourage operators to actively advance the stabilization of landfilled waste. The rebate could be accommodated within existing regulatory and tax regimes and would be paid for: (i) every tonne of nitrogen (or other agreed leachate marker) whose removal is advanced via the accelerated production and extraction of leachate; (ii) every tonne of non-commercially viable carbon removed via landfill gas collection and treatment. The rebates would be set at a level that would make it financially attractive to operators and would encourage measures such as leachate recirculation, in situ aeration, and enhanced flushing. Illustrative calculations suggest that a maximum rebate of up to ∼€50/tonne MSW would provide an adequate incentive.

[1]  H. Scharff Landfills as sinks for (hazardous) substances , 2012, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[2]  C. Guarneri Cornell University Press , 1991 .

[3]  C. Taylor,et al.  Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[4]  Morton A Barlaz,et al.  A performance-based system for the long-term management of municipal waste landfills. , 2011, Waste management.

[5]  John McDougall,et al.  Sustainable landfill: the role of fail-safe engineering for landfill aftercare. , 2007 .

[6]  William Powrie,et al.  Overcoming problems in the development of a high rate flushing bioreactor landfill , 1997 .

[7]  P. V. Soest Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant , 1994 .

[8]  Julia Gebert,et al.  Biotic systems to mitigate landfill methane emissions , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[9]  David Laner,et al.  A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills. , 2012, Waste management.

[10]  R. P. Beaven,et al.  Evaluation of the total pollution load of MSW , 1997 .

[11]  C. Gollier Pricing the future: The economics of discounting and sustainable development , 2013 .

[12]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  The outlook for improved carbon capture technology , 2012 .

[13]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Stern Review : The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[14]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[15]  M. Reiser,et al.  Aerobic in situ stabilization of Landfill Konstanz Dorfweiher: leachate quality after 1 year of operation. , 2012, Waste management.

[16]  J. Bogner,et al.  A process‐based inventory model for landfill CH4 emissions inclusive of seasonal soil microclimate and CH4 oxidation , 2011 .

[17]  Charlotte Scheutz,et al.  Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.