Deciphering Cancer Cell Behavior From Motility and Shape Features: Peer Prediction and Dynamic Selection to Support Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy

Cell motility varies according to intrinsic features and microenvironmental stimuli, being a signature of underlying biological phenomena. The heterogeneity in cell response, due to multilevel cell diversity especially relevant in cancer, poses a challenge in identifying the biological scenario from cell trajectories. We propose here a novel peer prediction strategy among cell trajectories, deciphering cell state (tumor vs. nontumor), tumor stage, and response to the anticancer drug etoposide, based on morphology and motility features, solving the strong heterogeneity of individual cell properties. The proposed approach first barcodes cell trajectories, then automatically selects the good ones for optimal model construction (good teacher and test sample selection), and finally extracts a collective response from the heterogeneous populations via cooperative learning approaches, discriminating with high accuracy prostate noncancer vs. cancer cells of high vs. low malignancy. Comparison with standard classification methods validates our approach, which therefore represents a promising tool for addressing clinically relevant issues in cancer diagnosis and therapy, e.g., detection of potentially metastatic cells and anticancer drug screening.

[1]  L. Zitvogel,et al.  Chemotherapy-induced antitumor immunity requires formyl peptide receptor 1 , 2015, Science.

[2]  Josef Kittler,et al.  A Comparative Study of Hough Transform Methods for Circle Finding , 1989, Alvey Vision Conference.

[3]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  Lin Liu,et al.  Collective behavior learning by differentiating personal preference from peer influence , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  Dissecting Effects of Anti-cancer Drugs and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts by On-Chip Reconstitution of Immunocompetent Tumor Microenvironments. , 2018, Cell reports.

[6]  Christina Kluge,et al.  Data Reduction And Error Analysis For The Physical Sciences , 2016 .

[7]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  A Camera Sensors-Based System to Study Drug Effects on In Vitro Motility: The Case of PC-3 Prostate Cancer Cells , 2020, Sensors.

[8]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[9]  Vicky H. Mak-Hau,et al.  Identifying items for moderation in a peer assessment framework , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  Online Feature Selection for Robust Classification of the Microbiological Quality of Traditional Vanilla Cream by Means of Multispectral Imaging , 2019, Sensors.

[11]  N. Altman An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression , 1992 .

[12]  P. Koumoutsakos,et al.  Feature point tracking and trajectory analysis for video imaging in cell biology. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  Quantification of Cytotoxicity using the IncuCyte ® Cytotoxicity Assay , 2014 .

[14]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[15]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  Automated Classification of Apoptosis in Phase Contrast Microscopy Using Capsule Network , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Matthew J Zdilla,et al.  Circularity, Solidity, Axes of a Best Fit Ellipse, Aspect Ratio, and Roundness of the Foramen Ovale: A Morphometric Analysis With Neurosurgical Considerations , 2016, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[17]  Gabriele Magna,et al.  Unsupervised On-Line Selection of Training Features for a robust classification with drifting and faulty gas sensors , 2018 .

[18]  Arpit Agarwal,et al.  Peer Prediction with Heterogeneous Users , 2017, EC.

[19]  C ParkesDavid,et al.  Peer Prediction with Heterogeneous Users , 2020 .

[20]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[21]  Darren J. Kerbyson,et al.  Size invariant circle detection , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  A. John Mallinckrodt,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1993 .

[23]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[24]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[25]  C Di Natale,et al.  The influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on the analysis of cell-cell interaction: a systematic study for time-lapse microscopy applications , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[27]  A. Barra,et al.  Organs on chip approach: a tool to evaluate cancer -immune cells interactions , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[28]  S. Dixon,et al.  Systematic Quantification of Population Cell Death Kinetics in Mammalian Cells. , 2017, Cell systems.

[29]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Biomodulatory therapy induces complete molecular remission in chemorefractory acute myeloid leukemia , 2015, Haematologica.

[30]  Fabien Ringeval,et al.  An array of physical sensors and an adaptive regression strategy for emotion recognition in a noisy scenario , 2017 .

[31]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  Learning Cancer-Related Drug Efficacy Exploiting Consensus in Coordinated Motility Within Cell Clusters , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  M. Zoli,et al.  Serum protein changes in a rat model of chronic pain show a correlation between animal and humans , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[33]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[34]  Yang Liu,et al.  Online Learning Using Only Peer Assessment , 2019, ArXiv.

[35]  G. Scita,et al.  Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Plasticity Harnesses Endocytic Circuitries , 2015, Front. Oncol..