Optimal Bayesian Design by Inhomogeneous Markov Chain Simulation

We consider decision problems defined by a utility function and an underlying probability model for all unknowns. The utility function quantifies the decision maker's preferences over consequences. The optimal decision maximizes the expected utility function where the expectation is taken with respect to all unknowns, that is, future data and parameters. In many problems, the solution is not analytically tractable. For example, the utility function might involve moments that can be computed only by numerical integration or simulation. Also, the nature of the decision space (i.e., the set of all possible actions) might have a shape or dimension that complicates the maximization. The motivating application for this discussion is the choice of a monitoring network when the optimization is performed over the high-dimensional set of all possible locations of monitoring stations, possibly including choice of the number of locations. We propose an approach to optimal Bayesian design based on inhomogeneous Markov chain simulation. We define a chain such that the limiting distribution identifies the optimal solution. The approach is closely related to simulated annealing. Standard simulated annealing algorithms assume that the target function can be evaluated for any given choice of the variable with respect to which we wish to optimize. For optimal design problems the target function (i. e., expected utility) is in general not available for efficient evaluation and might require numerical integration. We overcome the problem by defining an inhomogeneous Markov chain on an appropriately augmented space. The proposed inhomogeneous Markov chain Monte Carlo method addresses within one simulation both problems, evaluation of the expected utility and maximization.

[1]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[2]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[3]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[4]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods , 1965 .

[5]  M. Degroot Optimal Statistical Decisions , 1970 .

[6]  Dean Isaacson,et al.  Markov Chains: Theory and Applications , 1976 .

[7]  R. Munn,et al.  The Design of Air Quality Monitoring Networks , 1981 .

[8]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Random Functions and Hydrology , 1984 .

[9]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications , 1987, Mathematics and Its Applications.

[11]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  Minimax and maximin distance designs , 1990 .

[12]  Prem K. Goel,et al.  A stochastic probing algorithm for global optimization , 1992, J. Glob. Optim..

[13]  M. Stein,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of kriging , 1993 .

[14]  D A Berry,et al.  A case for Bayesianism in clinical trials. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  Optimal Experimental Design for Another's Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  E. George,et al.  Journal of the American Statistical Association is currently published by American Statistical Association. , 2007 .

[17]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Randomized Trials , 1994, Bayesian Biostatistics.

[18]  L. Tierney Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions , 1994 .

[19]  K. Chaloner,et al.  Bayesian Experimental Design: A Review , 1995 .

[20]  Peter Müller,et al.  Optimal Design via Curve Fitting of Monte Carlo Experiments , 1995 .

[21]  Dongchu Sun,et al.  Bayesian design of experiment for quantal responses: What is promised versus what is delivered , 1996 .

[22]  A E Gelfand,et al.  Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials. , 1998, Biometrics.

[23]  C. Bielza,et al.  Decision Analysis by Augmented Probability Simulation , 1999 .

[24]  T. Fearn,et al.  The choice of variables in multivariate regression: a non-conjugate Bayesian decision theory approach , 1999 .

[25]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  Marginal MAP estimation using Markov chain Monte Carlo , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[26]  J. Bernardo,et al.  Simulation-Based Optimal Design , 1999 .

[27]  Peter Müller,et al.  Redesigning a Network of Rainfall Stations , 1999 .

[28]  B. Sansó,et al.  Venezuelan Rainfall Data Analysed by Using a Bayesian Space–time Model , 1999 .

[29]  J. Zidek,et al.  Designing and integrating composite networks for monitoring multivariate gaussian pollution fields , 2000 .

[30]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  Marginal maximum a posteriori estimation using Markov chain Monte Carlo , 2002, Stat. Comput..

[31]  D. Higdon Space and Space-Time Modeling using Process Convolutions , 2002 .

[32]  D. Draper,et al.  Stochastic Optimization: a Review , 2002 .

[33]  M. Clyde,et al.  Model Uncertainty , 2003 .

[34]  P. Brown,et al.  Gene Selection in Arthritis Classification With Large-Scale Microarray Expression Profiles , 2003, Comparative and functional genomics.

[35]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  A Gridding Method for Bayesian Sequential Decision Problems , 2003 .

[36]  J. Berger,et al.  Optimal predictive model selection , 2004, math/0406464.