Rapid Multi-Objective Optimization of Periodically Operated Processes Based on the Computer-Aided Nonlinear Frequency Response Method

The dynamic optimization of promising forced periodic processes has always been limited by time-consuming and expensive numerical calculations. The Nonlinear Frequency Response (NFR) method removes these limitations by providing excellent estimates of any process performance criteria of interest. Recently, the NFR method evolved to the computer-aided NFR method (cNFR) through a user-friendly software application for the automatic derivation of the functions necessary to estimate process improvement. By combining the cNFR method with standard multi-objective optimization (MOO) techniques, we developed a unique cNFR–MOO methodology for the optimization of periodic operations in the frequency domain. Since the objective functions are defined with entirely algebraic expressions, the dynamic optimization of forced periodic operations is extraordinarily fast. All optimization parameters, i.e., the steady-state point and the forcing parameters (frequency, amplitudes, and phase difference), are determined rapidly in one step. This gives the ability to find an optimal periodic operation around a sub-optimal steady-state point. The cNFR–MOO methodology was applied to two examples and is shown as an efficient and powerful tool for finding the best forced periodic operation. In both examples, the cNFR–MOO methodology gave conditions that could greatly enhance a process that is normally operated in a steady state.

[1]  Multi-objective Optimization of a Batch Transesterification Reactor Considering Reactor and Methanol Separation Unit Together , 2017 .

[2]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Nonlinear Frequency Analysis of the Ferrocyanide Oxidation Kinetics. Part I. A Theoretical Analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Tanja Vidaković-Koch,et al.  Computer-Aided Nonlinear Frequency Response Method for Investigating the Dynamics of Chemical Engineering Systems , 2020, Processes.

[4]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Dynamic process intensification , 2018, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering.

[5]  J. M. Douglas Periodic Reactor Operation , 1967 .

[6]  Jianping Yuan,et al.  Comprehensive Improvement of Mixed-Flow Pump Impeller Based on Multi-Objective Optimization , 2020, Processes.

[7]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Nonlinear frequency response analysis of forced periodic operations with simultaneous modulation of two general waveform inputs with applications on adiabatic CSTR with square-wave modulations , 2020 .

[8]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Fast evaluation of periodic operation of a heterogeneous reactor based on nonlinear frequency response analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Dominik Sebastian Josef Tillmanns,et al.  From molecules to dollars: integrating molecular design into thermo-economic process design using consistent thermodynamic modeling , 2017 .

[10]  J. E. Bailey,et al.  Improvement of the performance of a fixed-bed catalytic reactor by relaxed steady state operation , 1971 .

[11]  Mirko Skiborowski,et al.  Process synthesis and design methods for process intensification , 2018, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering.

[12]  Sebastian Engell,et al.  Model-based optimization and control of chromatographic processes , 2000 .

[13]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Nonlinear Frequency Response Method for Evaluating Forced Periodic Operations of Chemical Reactors , 2018 .

[14]  K. Sundmacher,et al.  Nonlinear Frequency Response of Electrochemical Methanol Oxidation Kinetics: A Theoretical Analysis , 2010 .

[15]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Nonlinear frequency response analysis of forced periodic operation of non-isothermal CSTR using single input modulations. Part I: Modulation of inlet concentration or flow-rate , 2014 .

[16]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Reducing the energy demand of continuous distillation processes by optimal controlled forced periodic operation , 2001 .

[17]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Integrated conceptual design of stirred tank reactors by periodic dynamic optimization , 2000 .

[18]  Y. Arkun,et al.  Dynamic modeling and optimization of an industrial fluid catalytic cracker , 2015 .

[19]  Michael Baldea,et al.  A pseudo‐transient optimization framework for periodic processes: Pressure swing adsorption and simulated moving bed chromatography , 2018 .

[20]  Xiaorong He,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for the periodic operation of the naphtha pyrolysis process using a new parallel hybrid algorithm combining NSGA-II with SQP , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[21]  Menka Petkovska,et al.  Fast Estimation of Quasi-Steady States of Cyclic Nonlinear Processes Based on Higher-Order Frequency Response Functions. Case Study: Cyclic Operation of an Adsorption Column , 2006 .

[22]  D. Simakov,et al.  CO2 Conversion Enhancement in a Periodically Operated Sabatier Reactor: Nonlinear Frequency Response Analysis and Simulation‐based Study , 2018 .

[23]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Challenges in process optimization for new feedstocks and energy sources , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[24]  Menka Petkovska,et al.  Evaluation of Performance of Periodically Operated Reactors for Single Input Modulations of General Waveforms , 2016 .

[25]  Mai Bui,et al.  Dynamic modelling and optimisation of flexible operation in post-combustion CO2 capture plants - A review , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[26]  F. J. M. Horn,et al.  Periodic Processes: A Variational Approach , 1967 .

[27]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Periodic Operation with Modulation of Inlet Concentration and Flow Rate. Part I: Nonisothermal Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor , 2016 .

[28]  Hans Bock,et al.  Efficient optimization of simulated moving bed processes , 2007 .

[29]  Gade Pandu Rangaiah,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization Applications in Chemical Process Engineering: Tutorial and Review , 2020, Processes.

[30]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Periodic Operation with Modulation of Inlet Concentration and Flow Rate. Part II: Adiabatic Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor , 2016 .

[31]  Yogendra Shastri,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of integrated biodiesel production and separation system , 2019, Fuel.

[32]  M. Petkovska,et al.  Evaluation of periodic processes with two modulated inputs based on nonlinear frequency response analysis. Case study: CSTR with modulation of the inlet concentration and flow-rate , 2013 .

[33]  Ali Cinar,et al.  A NUMERICAL-METHOD FOR DETERMINING OPTIMAL PARAMETER VALUES IN FORCED PERIODIC OPERATION , 1992 .

[34]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  An overview of process systems engineering approaches for process intensification: State of the art , 2018, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification.

[35]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Nonlinear frequency response analysis of forced periodic operation of non-isothermal CSTR with simultaneous modulation of inlet concentration and inlet temperature , 2015 .

[36]  J. M. Douglas,et al.  Unsteady state process operation , 1966 .

[37]  D. Do,et al.  Nonlinear frequency response of adsorption systems : isothermal batch and continuous flow adsorbers , 1998 .

[38]  N. Nikačević,et al.  Optimization of forced periodic operations in milli-scale fixed bed reactor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis , 2020 .

[39]  Luka A. ŽivkoviĿ,et al.  A method for reactor synthesis based on process intensification principles and optimization of superstructure consisting of phenomenological modules , 2016 .

[40]  A. Pohar,et al.  Reactor conceptual design by optimization for hydrogen production through intensified sorption- and membrane-enhanced water-gas shift reaction , 2020 .

[41]  M. Petkovska,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of periodically operated reactors based on the second order frequency response function , 2008 .

[42]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Interactive multi-objective optimization for simulated moving bed processes , 2007 .

[43]  L. Živković,et al.  Oxygen reduction reaction on silver electrodes under strong alkaline conditions , 2019, Electrochimica Acta.

[44]  Andrzej Stankiewicz,et al.  An industrial view on the dynamic operation of chemical converters , 1995 .

[45]  I. Abu-Reesh Single- and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Dual-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell Operating in Continuous-Flow Mode at Steady State , 2020, Processes.

[46]  Brahim Benyahia,et al.  Multi-objective optimal control of small-size wastewater treatment plants , 2015 .

[47]  Menka Petkovska,et al.  Use of Higher-Order Frequency Response Functions for Identification of Nonlinear Adsorption Kinetics: Single Mechanisms under Isothermal Conditions , 2000 .

[48]  Fabio Rinaldi,et al.  Exergetic, economic, and environmental evaluations and multi-objective optimization of a combined molten carbonate fuel cell-gas turbine system , 2015 .

[49]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  A non-dominated sorting hybrid algorithm for multi-objective optimization of engineering problems , 2011 .

[50]  L. Biegler,et al.  An Inexact Trust-Region Algorithm for the Optimization of Periodic Adsorption Processes , 2010 .