Temporal Trade-Off Effects in Sustained Attention: Dynamics in Visual Cortex Predict the Target Detection Performance during Distraction

Models of visual selective attention have suggested that the representation of specific features characterizing a target object is enhanced in the visual cortex, at the cost of competing task-irrelevant information. In psychophysical studies, however, such attentional enhancement has been shown to result in reduced perceptual sensitivity when maintained over periods of several seconds. Two experiments examined the relationship between target detection behavior and electrocortical facilitation in human visual cortex during sustained attention under competition, in near real time. Steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) were used in a change detection paradigm, in which a stream of flickering grating stimuli containing target events was fully overlapping with distractor faces (experiment 1) or competing complex scenes (experiment 2), covering the same part of the visual field. Beamformer source localization was used to test plausibility of lower-tier visual cortex involvement in modulation of the ssVEP signal. Results of both experiments suggest that early overallocation of visual cortical resources to the attended stimulus stream is associated with rapid reduction of electrocortical facilitation and poor change detection across the entire trial. By contrast, temporally balanced dynamics in visual cortex predicted accurate change detection. Together, the present results support models of sustained selective attention that emphasize competition for resources in lower-tier visual cortex. These models can be extended by a temporal dimension, on which attentive behavior is characterized by frugal resource sharing across the viewing time.

[1]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[2]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  P. Jolicoeur Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[9]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials. , 2002, Psychological science.

[13]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Attentional control of the processing of neural and emotional stimuli. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Can the Spotlight of Attention Be Shaped Like a Doughnut? Evidence From Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2002 .

[15]  P. Lang International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[16]  J. Enns,et al.  The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? , 2005, Psychological research.

[17]  S. Yantis,et al.  Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  When sustained attention impairs perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Feature-selective attention enhances color signals in early visual areas of the human brain , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  B. Hommel,et al.  Resource sharing in the attentional blink , 2006, Neuroreport.

[21]  J. Hulleman,et al.  Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink , 2007, Psychological research.

[22]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Alexander Maye,et al.  Temporal dynamics of access to consciousness in the attentional blink , 2007, NeuroImage.

[24]  Andreas Keil,et al.  The neural correlates of feature-based selective attention when viewing spatially and temporally overlapping images , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Delay of selective attention during the attentional blink , 2008, Vision Research.

[26]  W. Schneider,et al.  Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink , 2008, Neuroreport.

[27]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Time course of competition for visual processing resources between emotional pictures and foreground task. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Ross Cunnington,et al.  Attenuation of Neural Responses in Primary Visual Cortex during the Attentional Blink , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Prolonged reduction of electrocortical activity predicts correct performance during rapid serial visual processing. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[30]  S. Kastner,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Control in Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.