Accessibility of potential referents following categorical anaphors.

In 4 experiments, the authors investigated the accessibility of potential antecedents that were either referents or nonreferents of categorical anaphors using several methodologies. In 2 preliminary experiments, using an immediate probe recognition task, the authors replicated previous findings of inhibition for nonreferents following categorical anaphors. In Experiments 1-3, naming times to nonreferent probes were inhibited, but only at a delay and at the end of the sentence. Eye movements were monitored in Experiment 4, and reading times were found to be slower in end-of-sentence regions following the remention of the nonreferent but not on the nonreferent itself. These results suggest that decreases in nonreferent accessibility are due to postanaphoric processes, such as integrating the nonreferent into the discourse structure, and are not due to more immediate changes in activation occurring as part of the resolution process. Further, some inhibition effects may result from the use of probe tasks that require decisions.

[1]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[2]  G. Murphy,et al.  Establishing and accessing referents in discourse , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Albert T. Corbett Prenominal adjectives and the disambiguation of anaphoric nouns , 1984 .

[4]  A E Seiffert,et al.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. , 1998, Psychological review.

[5]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[6]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Attentuating Interference During Comprehension: The Role of Suppression , 1997 .

[7]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Automatic Contextual Facilitation in Readers of Three Ages. , 1978 .

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[9]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[10]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[11]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Proper Names as Controllers of Discourse Focus , 1988 .

[12]  Charles R. Fletcher Short-term memory processes in text comprehension , 1981 .

[13]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[14]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[15]  P. Gordon,et al.  Language Comprehension and Probe-List Memory , 2000 .

[16]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Modeling the mechanism of suppression in lexical access , 2000 .

[17]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Two Decades of Structure Building. , 1997, Discourse processes.

[18]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[19]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements and Anaphor Resolution: Effects of Antecedent Typicality and Distance , 1990, Language and speech.

[20]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms for Suppression of Inappropriate Information during Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Brain and Language.

[21]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Discourse: The Establishment and Maintenance of Reference , 2022 .

[22]  Debra L. Long,et al.  The strategic nature of less skilled readers’ suppression problems , 1999 .

[23]  M. Just,et al.  Changes in activation levels with negation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M. Gernsbacher Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[25]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[27]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns , 1990 .

[28]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[29]  W. Neill,et al.  Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Cataphoric Devices in Spoken Discourse , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .