An assessment of enhanced biosecurity interventions and their impact on porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus outbreaks within a managed group of farrow-to-wean farms, 2020–2021

Introduction Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has been a challenge for the U.S. swine industry for over 30 years, costing producers more than $600 million annually through reproductive disease in sows and respiratory disease in growing pigs. In this study, the impact of enhanced biosecurity practices of site location, air filtration, and feed mitigation was assessed on farrow-to-wean sites managed by a large swine production management company in the Midwest United States. Those three factors varied in the system that otherwise had implemented a stringent biosecurity protocol on farrow-to-wean sites. The routine biosecurity followed commonplace activities for farrow-to-wean sites that included but were not limited to visitor registration, transport disinfection, shower-in/shower-out procedures, and decontamination and disinfection of delivered items and were audited. Methods Logistic regression was used to evaluate PRRSV infection by site based on the state where the site is located and air filtration use while controlling for other variables such as vaccine status, herd size, and pen vs. stall. A descriptive analysis was used to evaluate the impact of feed mitigation stratified by air filtration use. Results Sites that used feed mitigates as additives in the diets, air filtration of barns, and that were in less swine-dense areas appeared to experience fewer outbreaks associated with PRRSV infection. Specifically, 23.1% of farms that utilized a feed mitigation program experienced PRRSV outbreaks, in contrast to 100% of those that did not. Sites that did not use air filtration had 20 times greater odds of having a PRRSV outbreak. The strongest protective effect was found when both air filtration and feed mitigation were used. Locations outside of Minnesota and Iowa had 98.5–99% lesser odds of infection as well. Discussion Enhanced biosecurity practices may yield significant protective effects and should be considered for producers in swine-dense areas or when the site contains valuable genetics or many pigs.

[1]  S. Dee,et al.  Feed: A new pathway for the domestic and transboundary spread of viral pathogens of veterinary significance. , 2022, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[2]  J. Nerem,et al.  Feed or feed transport as a potential route for a porcine epidemic diarrhea outbreak in a 10,000-sow breeding herd in Mexico. , 2021, Transboundary and Emerging Diseases.

[3]  R. Cochrane,et al.  Interventions to reduce porcine epidemic diarrhea virus prevalence in feed in a Chinese swine production system: A case study. , 2021, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[4]  C. Corzo,et al.  Spatial relative risk and factors associated with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreaks in United States breeding herds. , 2020, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[5]  S. Dee,et al.  An evaluation of additives for mitigating the risk of virus‐contaminated feed using an ice‐block challenge model , 2020, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[6]  David A. Rasmussen,et al.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus dissemination across pig production systems in the United States. , 2020, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[7]  S. Dee,et al.  Use of a demonstration project to evaluate viral survival in feed: Proof of concept , 2020, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[8]  P. Gauger,et al.  Assessing the effects of medium-chain fatty acids and fat sources on PEDV infectivity , 2019, Translational animal science.

[9]  G. Machado,et al.  Machine-learning algorithms to identify key biosecurity practices and factors associated with breeding herds reporting PRRS outbreak. , 2019, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[10]  T. VanderWeele The Interaction Continuum , 2019, Epidemiology.

[11]  D. Linhares,et al.  Development and validation of a scoring system to assess the relative vulnerability of swine breeding herds to the introduction of PRRS virus. , 2018, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[12]  Ju Ji,et al.  Survival of viral pathogens in animal feed ingredients under transboundary shipping models , 2018, PloS one.

[13]  M. Aoki To University of Minnesota , 2018 .

[14]  Su-Jin Park,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) modified-live virus vaccine on sow reproductive performance in endemic PRRS farms. , 2017, Veterinary Microbiology.

[15]  R. Morrison,et al.  Novel approaches for Spatial and Molecular Surveillance of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSv) in the United States , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  R. Morrison,et al.  Land altitude, slope, and coverage as risk factors for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) outbreaks in the United States , 2017, PloS one.

[17]  Alexander E Gorbalenya,et al.  Changes to taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2017) , 2017, Archives of Virology.

[18]  E. Mateu,et al.  Review on the transmission porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between pigs and farms and impact on vaccination , 2016, Veterinary Research.

[19]  S. Pillai,et al.  Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  S. Dee,et al.  An evaluation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus survival in individual feed ingredients in the presence or absence of a liquid antimicrobial , 2015, Porcine health management.

[21]  M. Shi,et al.  Evolutionary diversification of type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2015, The Journal of general virology.

[22]  R. Morrison,et al.  Temporal and spatial dynamics of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in the United States. , 2015, American journal of veterinary research.

[23]  S. Dee,et al.  An evaluation of a liquid antimicrobial (Sal CURB®) for reducing the risk of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection of naïve pigs during consumption of contaminated feed , 2014, BMC Veterinary Research.

[24]  C. Chae,et al.  Evaluation of the efficacy of a new modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine (Fostera PRRS) against heterologous PRRSV challenge. , 2014, Veterinary microbiology.

[25]  Y. Berhane,et al.  Investigation into the Role of Potentially Contaminated Feed as a Source of the First‐Detected Outbreaks of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea in Canada , 2014, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[26]  S. Dee,et al.  An evaluation of contaminated complete feed as a vehicle for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection of naïve pigs following consumption via natural feeding behavior: proof of concept , 2014, BMC Veterinary Research.

[27]  Kristin L. Sainani,et al.  Logistic Regression , 2014, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[28]  S. Dee,et al.  Project Update : Epidemiological study of air filtration systems for preventing PRRSV infection in large sow herds , 2012 .

[29]  S. Dee,et al.  Evaluation of the Long-Term Effect of Air Filtration on the Occurrence of New PRRSV Infections in Large Breeding Herds in Swine-Dense Regions , 2012, Viruses.

[30]  J. Kliebenstein,et al.  Economic Impact of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus on U.S. Pork Producers , 2012 .

[31]  Dale Polson,et al.  Terminology for classifying swine herds by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus status , 2011, Journal of Swine Health and Production.

[32]  S. Dee,et al.  Use of a production region model to assess the efficacy of various air filtration systems for preventing airborne transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae: results from a 2-year study. , 2010, Virus research.

[33]  C. Corzo,et al.  Long-distance airborne transport of infectious PRRSV and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from a swine population infected with multiple viral variants. , 2010, Veterinary microbiology.

[34]  Z. Poljak,et al.  Clinical signs and their association with herd demographics and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) control strategies in PRRS PCR-positive swine herds in Ontario. , 2010, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[35]  S. Dee,et al.  Evidence of long distance airborne transport of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae , 2009, Veterinary research.

[36]  S. Dee,et al.  Use of a production region model to assess the airborne spread of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2009, Veterinary microbiology.

[37]  Melanie Volkamer,et al.  Proof of Concept , 2009 .

[38]  S. Dee,et al.  Impact of a modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine intervention on a population of pigs infected with a heterologous isolate. , 2007, Vaccine.

[39]  I. Díaz,et al.  Different European-type vaccines against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus have different immunological properties and confer different protection to pigs. , 2006, Virology.

[40]  S. Kritas,et al.  Sow performance in an endemically porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS)-infected farm after sow vaccination with an attenuated PRRS vaccine. , 2005, Veterinary microbiology.

[41]  S. Dee,et al.  Evaluation of an air-filtration system for preventing aerosol transmission of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2005, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[42]  Colin D. Johnson,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[43]  T. Gojobori,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Viruses , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[44]  H. Nauwynck,et al.  Respiratory tract protection upon challenge of pigs vaccinated with attenuated porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccines. , 2003, Veterinary microbiology.

[45]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  A quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of PRRSV vaccination in pigs under experimental conditions. , 2001, Vaccine.

[46]  K. Lager,et al.  Differentiation of a Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Vaccine Strain from North American Field Strains by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of ORF 5 , 1998, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[47]  S. Goyal,et al.  Isolation of Swine Infertility and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (Isolate ATCC VR-2332) in North America and Experimental Reproduction of the Disease in Gnotobiotic Pigs , 1992, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[48]  G. Wensvoort,et al.  Experimental reproduction of porcine epidemic abortion and respiratory syndrome (mystery swine disease) by infection with Lelystad virus: Koch's postulates fulfilled. , 1991, The Veterinary quarterly.

[49]  M. Voets,et al.  Mystery swine disease in The Netherlands: the isolation of Lelystad virus. , 1991, The Veterinary quarterly.

[50]  R. Rothenberg Methods in epidemiologic research. , 1991, Upsala journal of medical sciences. Supplement.

[51]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[52]  M. Graffar [Modern epidemiology]. , 1971, Bruxelles medical.

[53]  P. Derfler,et al.  The United States Department of Agriculture , 1872, Nature.