Effect of Lowering Laser Energy on the Surface Roughness of Human Corneal Lenticules in SMILE.

PURPOSE To determine the effect of lowering femtosecond laser energy on the surface quality of the intrastromal interface during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS Forty age- and diopter-matched female patients (40 eyes) with moderate myopia received SMILE with different energy levels (100 to 150 nJ) and fixed spot separation (4.5 μm). Five human corneal lenticules from each energy group were evaluated by atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Both anterior and posterior surface characteristics of the lenticules were assessed. RESULTS All measurements of surface roughness were approximately three times higher and in the anterior and posterior surface of the lenticules with the energy level of 150 nJ than with 100 nJ (P < .001). Furthermore, atomic force microscopy analysis found that energy differences of 15 nJ or more made a significant difference in surface roughness at energy levels of 115 nJ or higher. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in all roughness values of both surfaces among the 100, 105, and 110 nJ groups. In addition, all values of surface roughness were significantly positively correlated with laser energy for both anterior and posterior surfaces of the lenticule (P < .001). Consistent with atomic force microscopy results, SEM also showed that the SMILE lenticules in the higher laser energy group had more irregular surfaces. CONCLUSIONS Lowering laser energy levels can improve surface quality of the lenticule of SMILE. To achieve better visual outcomes with faster recovery after the procedure, it is recommended to reduce the laser energy to less than 115 nJ at a spot separation of 4.5 μm. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(9):617-624.].

[1]  D. Donate,et al.  Lower Energy Levels Improve Visual Recovery in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). , 2016, Journal of refractive surgery.

[2]  Jing Ma,et al.  Efficacy, safety, predictability, aberrations and corneal biomechnical parameters after SMILE and FLEx: Meta-analysis. , 2016, International journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Yabo Yang,et al.  Early changes to dry eye and ocular surface after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. , 2016, International journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Jibo Zhou,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK Used to Treat Myopia: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  J. Zhao,et al.  Lenticule Quality After Continuous Curvilinear Lenticulerrhexis in SMILE Evaluated With Scanning Electron Microscopy. , 2015, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Effect of femtosecond laser setting on visual performance after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Reinstein,et al.  Small-incision lenticule extraction. , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  Marine Gobbe,et al.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes , 2014, Eye and Vision.

[9]  S. Yoo,et al.  Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after SMILE assessed using environmental scanning electron microscopy. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[10]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Intraindividual comparison of changes in corneal biomechanical parameters after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small‐incision lenticule extraction , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Corneal biomechanical effects: Small‐incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  Chun-Hsiu Liu,et al.  Opaque bubble layer: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevance , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  Xing-tao Zhou,et al.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Ivarsen,et al.  Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for Myopia. , 2012, Journal of refractive surgery.

[15]  M. Lombardo,et al.  Surface Quality of Femtosecond Dissected Posterior Human Corneal Stroma Investigated With Atomic Force Microscopy , 2012, Cornea.

[16]  A. Ivarsen,et al.  Small‐incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: Predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  Kimiya Shimizu,et al.  Early clinical outcomes, including efficacy and endothelial cell loss, of refractive lenticule extraction using a 500 kHz femtosecond laser to correct myopia , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  J. Mehta,et al.  Femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx): clinical results, interface evaluation, and intraocular pressure variation. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  R. Shah,et al.  Effect of scanning patterns on the results of femtosecond laser lenticule extraction refractive surgery , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  M. Blum,et al.  Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after femtosecond laser surgery for myopia comparing different laser parameters , 2011, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.