Does the Risk‐Benefit Analysis Favor the Extraction of Failed, Sterile Pacemaker and Defibrillator Leads?

Transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator (PM‐D) lead failure is an important clinical problem. Lead extraction is routinely performed in patients with transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator (PM‐D) infections. The management of sterile PM‐D leads that have failed or are no longer required is less uniform. While extraction of excess or failed sterile PM‐D leads is often advocated, the risk of lead extraction must be weighed against the risk of abandoning these leads. There are no randomized trials comparing lead extraction with abandoning sterile leads in this setting. What then are the data that are used to advocate the extraction of excess or failed, sterile chronically implanted PM‐D leads, and are the data adequate to make this recommendation?

[1]  J. V. van Dantzig,et al.  Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation During Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead Extraction , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  M. Niebauer,et al.  Nonthoracotomy Implantable Defibrillator Lead Extraction: , 2003, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  T. D. Sellers,et al.  Intravascular Extraction of Problematic or Infected Permanent Pacemaker Leads: 1994–1996 , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  Samuel O Jones,et al.  Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: outcomes and changing indications. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[5]  Tim Vaughn,et al.  Detection and management of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failure: incidence and clinical implications. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  T. D. Sellers,et al.  Initial experience with larger laser sheaths for the removal of transvenous pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. , 1999, Circulation.

[7]  David L Hayes,et al.  Do abandoned leads pose risk to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients? , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[8]  R. Friedman,et al.  Recommendations for Extraction of Chronically Implanted Transvenous Pacing and Defibrillator Leads: Indications, Facilities, Training , 2000, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  T. D. Sellers,et al.  Clinical Study of the Laser Sheath for Lead Extraction: The Total Experience in the United States , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  K. Wasmer,et al.  Prevalence of central venous occlusion in patients with chronic defibrillator leads. , 2001, American heart journal.

[11]  D. Hayes,et al.  Is There an Adverse Outcome From Abandoned Pacing Leads? , 2000, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[12]  I. Préda,et al.  Complications Due to Abandoned Noninfected Pacemaker Leads , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  D L Hayes,et al.  Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the pacing lead extraction with the excimer sheath (PLEXES) trial. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  F. Bracke,et al.  Complications due to abandoned noninfected pacemaker leads. , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  J. Brinker,et al.  Risks of spontaneous injury and extraction of an active fixation pacemaker lead: report of the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study and Worldwide Registry. , 1999, Circulation.