In science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, disabled people remain a significantly underrepresented part of the workforce. Recent data suggests that about 20% of undergraduates in the United States have disabilities, but representation in STEM fields is consistently lower than in the general population. Of those earning STEM degrees, only about 10% of undergraduates, 6% of graduate students, and 2% of doctoral students identify as disabled. This suggests that STEM fields have difficulty recruiting and retaining disabled students, which ultimately hurts the field, because disabled scientists bring unique problem-solving perspectives and input. This essay briefly explores the ways in which ableism—prejudice against disabled people based on the assumption that they are “less than” their nondisabled peers—in research contributes to the exclusion of disabled scientists and suggests ways in which the scientific community can improve accessibility and promote the inclusion of disabled scientists in academic science.
[1]
Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.
“Special needs” is an ineffective euphemism
,
2016,
Cognitive research: principles and implications.
[2]
Eryn Brown,et al.
Disability awareness: The fight for accessibility
,
2016,
Nature.
[3]
Helen Meekosha.
Decolonising disability: thinking and acting globally
,
2011
.
[4]
M. Oliver,et al.
The social model of disability: thirty years on
,
2013
.
[5]
Michel T. Kohl,et al.
Without inclusion, diversity initiatives may not be enough
,
2017,
Science.
[6]
B. Swenor,et al.
A decade of decline: Grant funding for researchers with disabilities 2008 to 2018
,
2020,
PloS one.
[7]
Nathan W. Moon,et al.
Virtual Mentoring and Persistence in STEM for Students With Disabilities
,
2017
.
[8]
Rethinking the basic-applied dichotomy
,
2016,
Cognitive research: principles and implications.