A new one‐point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid‐shell element with multiple integration points along thickness: Part I—geometrically linear applications

Accuracy and efficiency are the main features expected in finite element method. In the field of low‐order formulations, the treatment of locking phenomena is crucial to prevent poor results. For three‐dimensional analysis, the development of efficient and accurate eight‐node solid‐shell finite elements has been the principal goal of a number of recent published works. When modelling thin‐ and thick‐walled applications, the well‐known transverse shear and volumetric locking phenomena should be conveniently circumvented. In this work, the enhanced assumed strain method and a reduced in‐plane integration scheme are combined to produce a new eight‐node solid‐shell element, accommodating the use of any number of integration points along thickness direction. Furthermore, a physical stabilization procedure is employed in order to correct the element's rank deficiency. Several factors contribute to the high computational efficiency of the formulation, namely: (i) the use of only one internal variable per element for the enhanced part of the strain field; (ii) the reduced integration scheme; (iii) the prevention of using multiple elements' layers along thickness, which can be simply replaced by any number of integration points within a single element layer. Implementation guidelines and numerical results confirm the robustness and efficiency of the proposed approach when compared to conventional elements well‐established in the literature. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Reduced integration technique in general analysis of plates and shells , 1971 .

[2]  E. Wilson,et al.  A non-conforming element for stress analysis , 1976 .

[3]  Medhat A. Haroun,et al.  Reduced and selective integration techniques in the finite element analysis of plates , 1978 .

[4]  T. Hughes.  Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and nonlinear media , 1980 .

[5]  K. Bathe,et al.  A continuum mechanics based four‐node shell element for general non‐linear analysis , 1984 .

[6]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Consistent linearization in elasto‐plastic shell analysis , 1988 .

[7]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  A class of simple and efficient degenerated shell elements-analysis of global spurious-mode filtering , 1989 .

[8]  Loc Vu-Quoc,et al.  A perturbation method for dynamic analyses using under-integrated shell elements , 1990 .

[9]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A CLASS OF MIXED ASSUMED STRAIN METHODS AND THE METHOD OF INCOMPATIBLE MODES , 1990 .

[10]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Assumed strain stabilization of the 4-node quadrilateral with 1-point quadrature for nonlinear problems , 1991 .

[11]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Geometrically non‐linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes , 1992 .

[12]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Advances in one-point quadrature shell elements , 1992 .

[13]  Loc Vu-Quoc,et al.  On a highly robust spurious‐mode filtering method for uniformly reduced‐integrated shell elements , 1992 .

[14]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  Improved versions of assumed enhanced strain tri-linear elements for 3D finite deformation problems☆ , 1993 .

[15]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  EAS‐elements for two‐dimensional, three‐dimensional, plate and shell structures and their equivalence to HR‐elements , 1993 .

[16]  E. Ramm,et al.  Three‐dimensional extension of non‐linear shell formulation based on the enhanced assumed strain concept , 1994 .

[17]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Multiple quadrature underintegrated finite elements , 1994 .

[18]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Physical stabilization of the 4-node shell element with one point quadrature , 1994 .

[19]  E. Ramm,et al.  Large elasto-plastic finite element analysis of solids and shells with the enhanced assumed strain concept , 1996 .

[20]  Joze Korelc,et al.  Symbolic approach in computational mechanics and its application to the enhanced strain method , 1996 .

[21]  S. Reese,et al.  A comparison of three-dimensional continuum and shell elements for finite plasticity , 1996 .

[22]  Francisco Armero,et al.  On the formulation of enhanced strain finite elements in finite deformations , 1997 .

[23]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A geometrical non‐linear brick element based on the EAS‐method , 1997 .

[24]  Serge Cescotto,et al.  An 8-node brick element with mixed formulation for large deformation analyses , 1997 .

[25]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  A multiple-quadrature eight-node hexahedral finite element for large deformation elastoplastic analysis , 1998 .

[26]  Christian Miehe,et al.  A theoretical and computational model for isotropic elastoplastic stress analysis in shells at large strains , 1998 .

[27]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  A SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF 'SOLID-SHELL' ELEMENT FORMULATIONS FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR ANALYSES EMPLOYING ONLY DISPLACEMENT DEGREES OF FREEDOM , 1998 .

[28]  R. de Borst,et al.  Towards efficient and robust elements for 3D-soil plasticity , 1999 .

[29]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A continuum based three-dimensional shell element for laminated structures , 1999 .

[30]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  New enhanced strain elements for incompressible problems , 1999 .

[31]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  On volumetric locking of low‐order solid and solid‐shell elements for finite elastoviscoplastic deformations and selective reduced integration , 2000 .

[32]  Michael A. Puso,et al.  A highly efficient enhanced assumed strain physically stabilized hexahedral element , 2000 .

[33]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  A stabilization technique to avoid hourglassing in finite elasticity , 2000 .

[34]  S. Reese,et al.  A new locking-free brick element technique for large deformation problems in elasticity ☆ , 2000 .

[35]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  Extension of the ‘solid‐shell’ concept for application to large elastic and large elastoplastic deformations , 2000 .

[36]  Dominique Chapelle,et al.  The mathematical shell model underlying general shell elements , 2000 .

[37]  Arif Masud,et al.  A stabilized 3-D co-rotational formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis of multi-layered composite shells , 2000 .

[38]  Alexander G Iosilevich,et al.  An evaluation of the MITC shell elements , 2000 .

[39]  Eric P. Kasper,et al.  A mixed-enhanced strain method , 2000 .

[40]  Reinhard E. Piltner,et al.  An implementation of mixed enhanced finite elements with strains assumed in Cartesian and natural element coordinates using sparse B (overline)‐matrices , 2000 .

[41]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  `Solid-shell' elements with linear and quadratic shape functions at large deformations with nearly incompressible materials , 2001 .

[42]  S. Reese.  On the Equivalent of Mixed Element Formulations and the Concept of Reduced Integration in Large Deformation Problems , 2002 .

[43]  Renato Natal Jorge,et al.  Development of shear locking‐free shell elements using an enhanced assumed strain formulation , 2002 .

[44]  Frédéric Barlat,et al.  Development of a one point quadrature shell element for nonlinear applications with contact and anisotropy , 2002 .

[45]  X. G. Tan,et al.  Optimal solid shells for non-linear analyses of multilayer composites. II. Dynamics , 2003 .

[46]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  On the use of an enhanced transverse shear strain shell element for problems involving large rotations , 2003 .

[47]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  A new volumetric and shear locking‐free 3D enhanced strain element , 2003 .

[48]  Antoine Legay,et al.  Elastoplastic stability analysis of shells using the physically stabilized finite element SHB8PS , 2003 .

[49]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  An enhanced strain 3D element for large deformation elastoplastic thin-shell applications , 2004 .